Literature DB >> 26133597

Dosimetric results in treatments of neuroblastoma and neuroendocrine tumors with (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine with implications for the activity to administer.

Pablo Mínguez1, Glenn Flux2, José Genollá3, Sonía Guayambuco3, Alejandro Delgado3, José Cruz Fombellida3, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate whole-body and red marrow absorbed doses in treatments of neuroblastoma (NB) and adult neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine and to propose a simple method for determining the activity to administer when dosimetric data for the individual patient are not available.
METHODS: Nine NB patients and six NET patients were included, giving in total 19 treatments as four patients were treated twice. Whole-body absorbed doses were determined from dose-rate measurements and planar gamma-camera imaging. For six NB and five NET treatments, red marrow absorbed doses were also determined using the blood-based method.
RESULTS: Dosimetric data from repeated administrations in the same patient were consistent. In groups of NB and NET patients, similar whole-body residence times were obtained, implying that whole-body absorbed dose per unit of administered activity could be reasonably well described as a power function of the patient mass. For NB, this functional form was found to be consistent with dosimetric data from previously published studies. The whole-body to red marrow absorbed dose ratio was similar among patients, with values of 1.4 ± 0.6-1.7 ± 0.7 (1 standard deviation) in NB treatments and between 1.5 ± 0.6 and 1.7 ± 0.7 (1 standard deviation) in NET treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: The consistency of dosimetric results between administrations for the same patient supports prescription of the activity based on dosimetry performed in pretreatment studies, or during the first administration in a fractionated schedule. The expressions obtained for whole-body absorbed doses per unit of administered activity as a function of patient mass for NB and NET treatments are believed to be a useful tool to estimate the activity to administer at the stage when the individual patient biokinetics has not yet been measured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133597     DOI: 10.1118/1.4921807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  Dosimetry-based high-activity therapy with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (131I-mIBG) and topotecan for the treatment of high-risk refractory neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jose Genolla; Trinidad Rodriguez; Pablo Minguez; Ricardo Lopez-Almaraz; Veronica Llorens; Aizpea Echebarria
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Impact of Whole-Body Radiation Dose on Response and Toxicity in Patients With Neuroblastoma After Therapy With 131 I-Metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG).

Authors:  Megan Trieu; Steven G DuBois; Elizabeth Pon; Lorenzo Nardo; Randall A Hawkins; Araz Marachelian; Clare J Twist; Julie R Park; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Personalized dosimetry for a deeper understanding of metastatic response to high activity 131I-mIBG therapy in high risk relapsed refractory neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Bartolomeo Cassano; Milena Pizzoferro; Silvio Valeri; Claudia Polito; Salvatore Donatiello; Claudio Altini; Maria Felicia Villani; Annalisa Serra; Aurora Castellano; Maria Carmen Garganese; Vittorio Cannatà
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

4.  Dependence of treatment planning accuracy in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy on the sampling schedule.

Authors:  Christian Maaß; Jan Philipp Sachs; Deni Hardiansyah; Felix M Mottaghy; Peter Kletting; Gerhard Glatting
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 5.  Radionuclide therapy: current status and prospects for internal dosimetry in individualized therapeutic planning.

Authors:  Marcelo Tatit Sapienza; José Willegaignon
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.