Literature DB >> 26133468

Radiographic Implications of Fat Grafting to the Reconstructed Breast.

Ximena A Pinell-White1, Joanna Etra1, Mary Newell2, Daymen Tuscano2, Kyungmin Shin2, Albert Losken1.   

Abstract

Autologous fat transfer is often used to smooth contour irregularities in the reconstructed breast. A potential concern with this technique is that it results in calcified lesions in the breast that can complicate subsequent cancer surveillance. The purpose of this review was to determine how fat grafting to the reconstructed breast impacts postoperative breast imaging. This is a matched cohort analysis of patients who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction with and without fat grafting as a secondary procedure. Nonfat grafted reconstructive patients were matched based on age, year of initial reconstruction, and type of reconstruction. Postoperative imaging at our institution was required for inclusion. The two groups were compared in terms of incidence and distribution of radiographic studies performed in follow-up and the need for biopsies. Fifty-one reconstructed breasts with a history of fat grafting were compared to 51 nonfat grafted, reconstructed breasts. The fat grafted group underwent a total of 204 breast imaging studies over a mean follow-up of 4.2 years, while the nonfat grafted group underwent 167 studies over 4.1 years (p = 0.21). More mammograms, ultrasounds, and magnetic resonance images were performed after fat grafting, but a significant difference was evident only for mammography (34 versus 12, p = 0.05). The incidence of breast biopsy to clarify abnormal imaging was nonsignificantly higher in the fat grafted group (17.6% versus 7.8%, p = 0.14). Fewer than 10 percent of imaging studies in the fat grafted cohort were performed to investigate a clinical or radiographic abnormality occupying the same breast quadrant as prior fat injection. Breast cancer patients treated with fat grafting required more breast imaging and biopsies than their nonfat grafted counterparts, but the areas of suspicion poorly corresponded to the site of prior fat grafting. Multimodal breast reconstruction may drive the additional diagnostic burden and not the fat grafting technique itself.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous fat transfer; breast imaging; breast reconstruction; mammography

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133468     DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  10 in total

Review 1.  Autologous fat grafting in breast reconstruction: implications for follow-up and surveillance.

Authors:  Summer E Hanson; Sahil K Kapur; Rosa F Hwang; Mark S Dryden
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 2.  Oncological Safety of Autologous Fat Grafting in Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis Based on Matched Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Ming Li; Yao Shi; Qiuyue Li; Xin Guo; Xuefeng Han; Facheng Li
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Long-term Follow-up of Autologous Fat Transfer vs Conventional Breast Reconstruction and Association With Cancer Relapse in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Todor Krastev; Arjen van Turnhout; Eline Vriens; Luc Smits; René van der Hulst
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Association of Fat Grafting With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Babak J Mehrara; Jeffrey H Kozlow
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Palpable Lumps after Mastectomy: Radiologic-Pathologic Review of Benign and Malignant Masses.

Authors:  Rend Al-Khalili; Ali Alzeer; Giang-Kimthi Nguyen; Erin P Crane; Judy H Song; Janice L Jeon; Michael Nellamattathil; Erini V Makariou; Victoria L Mango
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer.

Authors:  T K Krastev; S J Schop; J Hommes; A A Piatkowski; E M Heuts; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The use of autologous fat grafts in breast surgery: A literature review.

Authors:  Yalcin Bayram; Melihcan Sezgic; Percin Karakol; Mehmet Bozkurt; Gaye Taylan Filinte
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2019-11-15

8.  The prognosis outcomes of autologous fat transfer for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Daixiong Tian; Ying Chu; Ge Zhang; Dan Huang; Jialin Huang; Jin Zeng
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-07

Review 9.  Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Novel Approaches to Breast Reconstruction: Their Suitability for Tissue Engineering and Oncological Safety.

Authors:  Niamh O'Halloran; Donald Courtney; Michael J Kerin; Aoife J Lowery
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-08-16

10.  Radiographic surveillance of abdominal free fat graft in complex parotid pleomorphic adenomas: A case series.

Authors:  Yu-Jin Lee; Nancy J Fischbein; Uchechukwu Megwalu; Fred M Baik; Vasu Divi; Michael J Kaplan; Davud B Sirjani
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.