| Literature DB >> 26133125 |
Abstract
Green exercise research often reports psychological health outcomes without rigorously controlling exercise. This study examines effects of visual exercise environments on directed attention, perceived exertion and time to exhaustion, whilst measuring and controlling the exercise component. Participants completed three experimental conditions in a randomized counterbalanced order. Conditions varied by video content viewed (nature; built; control) during two consistently-ordered exercise bouts (Exercise 1: 60% VO2peakInt for 15-mins; Exercise 2: 85% VO2peakInt to voluntary exhaustion). In each condition, participants completed modified Backwards Digit Span tests (a measure of directed attention) pre- and post-Exercise 1. Energy expenditure, respiratory exchange ratio and perceived exertion were measured during both exercise bouts. Time to exhaustion in Exercise 2 was also recorded. There was a significant time by condition interaction for Backwards Digit Span scores (F2,22 = 6.267, p = 0.007). Scores significantly improved in the nature condition (p < 0.001) but did not in the built or control conditions. There were no significant differences between conditions for either perceived exertion or physiological measures during either Exercise 1 or Exercise 2, or for time to exhaustion in Exercise 2. This was the first study to demonstrate effects of controlled exercise conducted in different visual environments on post-exercise directed attention. Via psychological mechanisms alone, visual nature facilitates attention restoration during moderate-intensity exercise.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive functioning; directed attention; exercise environments; green exercise; perceived exertion; wellbeing
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26133125 PMCID: PMC4515658 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120707321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Mean (±SD) pre- and post- Exercise 1 Backwards Digit Span test scores by condition; Higher score represents greater level of directed attention; *, pre- and post- Exercise 1 values significantly differ (p = 0.001); , significant time by condition interaction (p = 0.007).
Figure 2Mean (±SD) energy expenditure and respiratory exchange ratio by condition for Exercise 1 and Exercise 2; Exercise 1 duration was 15-mins, Exercise 2 values each represent 4:47-mins of data.
Mean (± SD) results for heart rate and time to exhaustion by condition.
| Measure | Exercise Bout / Time (mins) | Condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nature | Built | Control | ||
| Heart Rate (bpm) | Exercise 1 | 108.8 ± 9.2 | 109.9 ± 11.2 | 107.5 ± 12.0 |
| Exercise 2 | 145.7 ± 7.9 | 145.1 ± 11.0 | 144.1 ± 9.5 | |
| Time to exhaustion (secs) | Exercise 2 | 824.1 ± 336.3 | 726.0 ± 269.8 | 769.17 ± 292.2 |
Figure 3Perceived exertion scores by exercise bout, time and condition; Rated perceived exertion: minimum value = 6 (no exertion at all), maximum value = 20 (maximal exertion).