Literature DB >> 26132983

Implementing the Modified 2009 American Thyroid Association Risk Stratification System in Thyroid Cancer Patients with Low and Intermediate Risk of Recurrence.

Fabián Pitoia1, Fernando Jerkovich1, Carolina Urciuoli1, Angélica Schmidt1, Erika Abelleira1, Fernanda Bueno1, Graciela Cross1, R Michael Tuttle2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to validate the proposed modified 2009 American Thyroid Association Risk Stratification System (M-2009-RSS) in patients with thyroid cancer and to compare the findings with those of the 2009 ATA Risk of Recurrence (2009 ATA-RR) and the Ongoing Risk of recurrence system. The secondary purpose was to assess which risk stratification system had the best predictive value to foresee the probability of structural incomplete response or the no evidence of disease (NED) status at the end of follow-up. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 149 patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who had low and intermediate 2009 ATA-RR and were treated at a single experienced center and followed-up for a median of 6 years (range 3-12 years). Each patient was risk stratified using both the 2009 ATA-RR and the M-2009-RSS. The primary endpoints were 1) the best response to initial therapy defined as either excellent response, biochemical or structural incomplete response, or indeterminate response; 2) clinical status at final follow-up defined as either NED, biochemical incomplete response, structural incomplete response, indeterminate response, or recurrence (biochemical or structural disease identified after a period of NED), and 3) ongoing RR defined as low or high risk according several outcomes after initial treatment.
RESULTS: Mean age of included patients was 45.3±13 years. Both the ATA 2009-RR and the M-2009-RSS provided clinically meaningful graded estimates with regard to the status of NED at the end of follow-up in low-risk patients (84% for 2009 ATA-RR and 74% for M-2009-RSS) or the likelihood of having persistent structural disease (0% for 2009 ATA RR and 3.6% for the M-2009-RSS). When patients were classified as low risk, the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) to predict structural disease was 0% and 88.7% for the 2009 ATA-RR, 3.6% and 86.5% for the M-2009-RSS, and 1.6% and 68.2% for the ongoing RR (p=0.022 and 0.055 of chi-square test for PPV and NPV, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite expanding the definition of low risk to include small-volume lymph node metastases, minor extrathyroidal extension, and minimally invasive follicular thyroid cancer, the M-2009-RSS predicts clinical outcomes (structural incomplete response and NED at the end of follow-up) that are very similar to the previously validated 2009 ATA RR classification system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26132983     DOI: 10.1089/thy.2015.0121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thyroid        ISSN: 1050-7256            Impact factor:   6.568


  13 in total

1.  miRNA expression profiling of 'noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features' compared with adenomas and infiltrative follicular variants of papillary thyroid carcinomas.

Authors:  Nicla Borrelli; Maria Denaro; Clara Ugolini; Anello Marcello Poma; Mario Miccoli; Paolo Vitti; Paolo Miccoli; Fulvio Basolo
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Should Age at Diagnosis Be Included as an Additional Variable in the Risk of Recurrence Classification System in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Fabián Pitoia; Fernando Jerkovich; Anabella Smulever; Gabriela Brenta; Fernanda Bueno; Graciela Cross
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2017-01-07

3.  Outcome prediction with the revised American joint committee on cancer staging system and American thyroid association guidelines for thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Sunghwan Suh; Yun Hak Kim; Tae Sik Goh; Jin Lee; Dae Cheon Jeong; Sae-Ock Oh; Jong Chul Hong; Seong Jang Kim; In Joo Kim; Kyoungjune Pak
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 4.  [Hemithyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy for low-risk papillary thyroid cancer? : Surgical criteria for primary and secondary choice of treatment in an interdisciplinary treatment concept].

Authors:  H Dralle; F Weber; A Machens; T Brandenburg; K W Schmid; D Führer-Sakel
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-19

5.  Serum Linkage-Specific Sialylation Changes Are Potential Biomarkers for Monitoring and Predicting the Recurrence of Papillary Thyroid Cancer Following Thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Zhen Cao; Zejian Zhang; Rui Liu; Mengwei Wu; Zepeng Li; Xiequn Xu; Ziwen Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.055

6.  Thyroglobulin levels measured at the time of remnant ablation to predict response to treatment in differentiated thyroid cancer after thyroid hormone withdrawal or recombinant human TSH.

Authors:  Fabian Pitoia; Erika Abelleira; Graciela Cross
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Dynamics of serum antithyroglobulin antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Fernanda Bueno; María Gabriela García Falcone; Mirna Angela Peñaloza; Erika Abelleira; Fabián Pitoia
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System Derived from Meta-Analyses of Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Sunghwan Suh; Tae Sik Goh; Yun Hak Kim; Sae-Ock Oh; Kyoungjune Pak; Ju Won Seok; In Joo Kim
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2020-06-24

9.  Natural Course of the American Thyroid Association Response to Therapy Statuses (Dynamic Risk Stratification) in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Noha Mukhtar; Hadeel Aljamei; Abeer Aljomaiah; Yosra Moria; Ali S Alzahrani
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2020-12-01

10.  The BRAF V600E mutation is a predictor of the effect of radioiodine therapy in papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Junshang Ge; Jie Wang; Hui Wang; Xianjie Jiang; Qianjin Liao; Qian Gong; Yongzhen Mo; Xiaoling Li; Guiyuan Li; Wei Xiong; Jin Zhao; Zhaoyang Zeng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.