Literature DB >> 26132743

Cerebrovascular Pressure Reactivity in Children With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Philip M Lewis1, Marek Czosnyka, Bradley G Carter, Jeffrey V Rosenfeld, Eldho Paul, Nitesh Singhal, Warwick Butt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children. Cerebral autoregulation disturbance after traumatic brain injury is associated with worse outcome. Pressure reactivity is a fundamental component of cerebral autoregulation that can be estimated using the pressure-reactivity index, a correlation between slow arterial blood pressure, and intracranial pressure fluctuations. Pressure-reactivity index has shown prognostic value in adult traumatic brain injury, with one study confirming this in children. Pressure-reactivity index can identify a cerebral perfusion pressure range within which pressure reactivity is optimal. An increasing difference between optimal cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure is associated with worse outcome in adult traumatic brain injury; however, this has not been investigated in children. Our objective was to study pressure-reactivity index and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in pediatric traumatic brain injury, including associations with outcome, age, and cerebral perfusion pressure.
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: ICU, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. PATIENTS: Patients with traumatic brain injury who are 6 months to 16 years old, are admitted to the ICU, and require arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure monitoring.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial blood pressure, intracranial pressure, and end-tidal CO2 were recorded electronically until ICU discharge or monitoring cessation. Pressure-reactivity index and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure were computed according to previously published methods. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. Outcome was assessed 6 months post discharge using the modified Glasgow Outcome Score. Thirty-six patients were monitored, with 30 available for follow-up. Pressure-reactivity index correlated with modified Glasgow Outcome Score (Spearman ρ = 0.42; p = 0.023) and was higher in patients with unfavorable outcome (0.23 vs -0.09; p = 0.0009). A plot of pressure-reactivity index averaged within 5 mm Hg cerebral perfusion pressure bins showed a U-shape, reaffirming the concept of cerebral perfusion pressure optimization in children. Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure increased with age (ρ = 0.40; p = 0.02). Both the duration and magnitude of negative deviations in the difference between cerebral perfusion pressure and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure were associated with unfavorable outcome.
CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury, pressure-reactivity index has prognostic value and can identify cerebral perfusion pressure targets that may differ from treatment protocols. Our results suggest but do not confirm that cerebral perfusion pressure targeting using pressure-reactivity index as a guide may positively impact on outcome. This question should be addressed by a prospective clinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26132743     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  22 in total

1.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular reactivity through pulse transit time and intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Xiuyun Liu; Kais Gadhoumi; Ran Xiao; Nate Tran; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Steven W Hetts; Nerissa Ko; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.833

Review 2.  Neonatal cerebrovascular autoregulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Rhee; Cristine Sortica da Costa; Topun Austin; Ken M Brady; Marek Czosnyka; Jennifer K Lee
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 3.  Targeted treatment in severe traumatic brain injury in the age of precision medicine.

Authors:  Anthony A Figaji; A Graham Fieggen; Ncedile Mankahla; Nico Enslin; Ursula K Rohlwink
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 4.  Autoregulation in paediatric TBI-current evidence and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Joseph E Donnelly; Adam M H Young; Ken Brady
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Neuroprotective measures in children with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Shruti Agrawal; Ricardo Garcia Branco
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-02-04

Review 6.  The Anesthesiologist's Role in Treating Abusive Head Trauma.

Authors:  Jennifer K Lee; Ken M Brady; Nina Deutsch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Is It Time to Consider Gender-Based Treatments?

Authors:  Jennifer K Lee; Raymond C Koehler
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.624

8.  Monitoring cerebrovascular reactivity in pediatric traumatic brain injury: comparison of three methods.

Authors:  Francisco Abecasis; Celeste Dias; Agnieszka Zakrzewska; Vitor Oliveira; Marek Czosnyka
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Multimodality neuromonitoring in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Adam M H Young; Mathew R Guilfoyle; Joseph Donnelly; Peter Smielewski; Shruti Agarwal; Marek Czosnyka; Peter J Hutchinson
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.756

10.  Individualizing Thresholds of Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Using Estimated Limits of Autoregulation.

Authors:  Joseph Donnelly; Marek Czosnyka; Hadie Adams; Chiara Robba; Luzius A Steiner; Danilo Cardim; Brenno Cabella; Xiuyun Liu; Ari Ercole; Peter John Hutchinson; David Krishna Menon; Marcel J H Aries; Peter Smielewski
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.