| Literature DB >> 26132506 |
Aleksandra Grudniewska1, Marek Kłobucki1, Katarzyna Dancewicz2, Maryla Szczepanik3, Beata Gabryś2, Czesław Wawrzeńczyk1.
Abstract
Two racemic and two enantiomeric pairs of new δ-hydroxy-γ-lactones based on theEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26132506 PMCID: PMC4488555 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Synthesis of hydroxy lactones 6a-c.
Fig 2Synthesis of hydroxy lactones 11a-c.
Feeding deterrent activity of piperitone and the hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) against Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer).
| Compound | Deterrence coefficients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae | Adults | |||||
| A | R | T | A | R | T | |
|
| −4.76 ab | 25.07 a | 20.31 a | 12.24 a | 69.21 b | 81.45 a |
|
| 11.98 ab | 43.51 a | 54.49 ab | 92.58 c | 20.73 a | 111.23 a |
|
| 31.54 b | 86.18 b | 117.72 b | 76.85 bc | 72.38 b | 149.23 ab |
|
| 20.15 ab | 26.15 a | 46.30 ab | 51.23 ab | 67.62 b | 118.85 a |
|
| −19.53 a | 13.68 a | −5.85 a | 93.61 c | 78.28 b | 171.89 b |
|
| 4.47 ab | 48.14 a | 52.61 ab | 77.58 bc | 61.44 b | 139.02 ab |
|
| 14.20 ab | 31.82 a | 46.02 ab | 94.09 c | 86.20 b | 180.29 b |
Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). A, absolute coefficient (no-choice test); R, relative coefficient (choice test); T, total coefficient (T = A + R). Means followed by the same letters within each column are not significantly different (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests, p < 0.05).
Fig 3Effects of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) on the feeding of Alphitobius diaperinus larvae and adults in no-choice tests.
Data are expressed as percentages of control consumption. Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). The standard error is indicated on each bar. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; NS: not significant (Student’s t-test).
Feeding deterrent activity of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) against Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say).
| Compound | Deterrence coefficients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae | Adults | |||||
| A | R | T | A | R | T | |
|
| 3.43 abc | 21.9 ab | 25.33 ab | 24.97 bc | 6.38 a | 31.35 abc |
|
| nt | nt | nt | nt | nt | nt |
|
| −18.50 a | 8.42 a | −10.08 a | −11.21 a | 17.52 ab | 6.31 a |
|
| −10.82 ab | 29.61 ab | 18.79 ab | 12.89 ab | 12.36 a | 25.25 ab |
|
| −11.29 ab | 55.88 bc | 44.59 b | 33.63 c | 41.96 bc | 75.59 d |
|
| 25.58 c | 69.53 c | 95.11 c | 18.34 bc | 54.78 c | 73.12 d |
|
| 12.62 bc | 43.47 b | 56.09 b | 15.81 bc | 41.32 bc | 57.13 bcd |
Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). A, absolute coefficient (no-choice test); R, relative coefficient (choice test); T, total coefficient (T = A + R). Means followed by the same letters within each column are not significantly different (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests, p < 0.05).
aNot tested.
Fig 4Effects of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6b,c and 11a-c) on the feeding of Leptinotarsa decemlineata larvae and adults in no-choice tests.
Data are expressed as percentages of control consumption. Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). The standard error is indicated on each bar. *** p < 0.001; NS: not significant (Student’s t-test).
Fig 5Relative index of deterrence (DI) of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) 1, 2, and 24 h after application.
Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant biological activity according to the Student's t-test results (p < 0.05); DI < 0, attractant; DI > 0, deterrent (n = 8 replicates, 20 viviparous apterous females/replicate).
Effects of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6b and 11a-c) on probing activities of Myzus persicae (Sulz.).
| EPG parameter | Control | Piperitone | 6b | 11a | 11b | 11c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Total duration of nonprobing (min) | 23.1 ± 8.1 | 35.9 ± 8.4 | 29.9 ± 5.1 | 28.3 ± 7.7 | 32.4 ± 8.5 | 68.8 ± 15.4 |
| Total duration of pathway (min) | 193.6 ± 29.7 | 232.0 ± 22.7 | 337.9 ± 29.5 | 203.0 ± 36.2 | 280.9 ± 35.0 | 257.1 ± 37.0 |
| Total duration of the phloem phase (min) | 214.2 ± 45.9 | 192.2 ± 30.7 | 80.4 ± 32.0 | 241.9 ± 39.9 | 144.7 ± 37.1 | 119.3 ± 37.1 |
| Total duration of the phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 212.0 ± 45.8 | 189.5 ± 30.6 | 78.1 ± 31.9 | 231.0 ± 38.8 | 142.5 ± 37.2 | 116.6 ± 37.2 |
| Total duration of derailed stylet activities (min) | 0.0 | 5.7 ± 5.7 | 5.9 ± 5.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.8 ± 8.8 |
| Duration of xylem sap uptake (min) | 49.1 ± 29.8 | 14.1 ± 9.1 | 25.9 ± 13.1 | 6.8 ± 2.9 | 22.1 ± 12.5 | 26.1 ± 15.6 |
| Proportion of the phloem phase in total probing (%) | 46.3 ± 9.6 | 42.7 ± 6.7 | 17.7 ± 6.9 | 53.0 ± 8.4 | 31.7 ± 8.0 | 28.3 ± 8.1 |
| Mean duration of nonprobing (min) | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.6 |
| No. of probes | 6.8 ± 1.6 | 19.1 ± 3.9 | 27.6 ± 5.5 | 12.3 ± 2.4 | 15.9 ± 4.1 | 22.0 ± 4.0 |
| No. of short probes (pathway < 3 min) | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 3.8 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 7.1 ± 2.5 | 9.3 (±2.6) |
| Duration of first probe (min) | 94.1 ± 52.3 | 7.3 ±5.1 | 30.6 ± 10.9 | 33.7 ± 13.0 | 69.4 ± 40.1 | 66.2 ± 40.4 |
| Mean duration of a probe (min) | 144.6 ± 46.5 | 34.2 ± 5.7 | 19.7 ± 3.3 | 59.9 ± 12.6 | 100.6 ± 39.8 | 62.0 ± 38.3 |
|
| ||||||
| Proportion of salivation in the total phloem phase (%) | 12.1 ± 8.9 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 16.3 ± 10.4 | 5.7 ± 2.6 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 18.8 ± 9.9 |
| No. of probes to the first phloem phase | 6.0 ± 1.4 | 12.3 ± 3.3 | 12.8 ± 4.1 | 6.6 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 12.2 ± 4.0 |
| Duration of the shortest pathway wave before the phloem phase (min) | 36.6 ± 6.1 | 33.6 ± 5.5 | 15.2 ± 3.3 | 20.9 ± 5.7 | 27.6 ± 7.7 | 41.7 ± 15.0 |
| Duration of nonprobe period before the first phloem phase (min) | 22.1 ± 8.7 | 26.0 ± 8.2 | 15.6 ± 5.7 | 18.7 ± 7.4 | 14.0 ± 4.2 | 34.1 ± 14.9 |
| Time from the first probe to first phloem phase (min) | 160.4 ± 34.2 | 167.1 ± 34.8 | 195.7 ± 71.2 | 154.0 ± 34.2 | 148.9 ± 35.2 | 186.2 ± 46.5 |
| Time from the beginning of probing to the first phloem phase (min) | 43.8 ± 5.6 | 40.6 ± 6.1 | 18.6 ± 4.5 | 26.8 ± 5.6 | 30.0 ± 7.5 | 45.2 ± 14.4 |
| Duration of the first phloem phase (min) | 152.7 ± 55.4 | 27.3 ± 11.8 | 53.5 ± 27.9 | 154.8 ± 43.6 | 102.1 ± 42.5 | 77.9 ± 40.2 |
| No. of probes after the first phloem phase | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 6.8 ± 3.5 | 14.5 ± 8.7 | 5.7 ± 1.8 | 10.8 ± 4.7 | 11.0 ± 3.1 |
| No. of probes (< 3 min) after the first phloem phase | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 1.3 | 6.8 ± 5.1 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 2.9 | 5.0 ± 1.8 |
|
| ||||||
| No. of phloem sap ingestion phases | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.8 |
| Mean duration of phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 173.5 ± 51.2 | 56.8 ± 12.8 | 34.3 ± 13.6 | 131.0 ± 37.1 | 73.5 ± 32.2 | 81.1 ± 43.8 |
| Time from the first probe to first phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 161.0 ± 34.2 | 168.0 ± 34.7 | 211.6 ± 76.4 | 172.4 ± 33.3 | 149.5 ± 35.2 | 159.0 ± 39.5 |
| Time from the beginning of probing to the first phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 44.4 ± 5.7 | 41.4 ± 6.1 | 21.9 ± 3.9 | 36.7 ± 7.8 | 30.7 ± 7.4 | 48.1 ± 15.8 |
| No. of sustained phloem sap ingestion phases (> 10 min) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.5 |
| Time from the first probe to first sustained phloem sap ingestion phase (10 min) (min) | 206.8 ± 37.3 | 157.7 ± 31.9 | 114.2 ± 69.8 | 155.9 ± 31.5 | 209.0 ± 44.6 | 158.0 ± 37.2 |
| Time from the beginning of that probe to first sustained phloem sap ingestion phase (10 min) (min) | 43.2 ± 4.7 | 52.2 ± 7.7 | 21.1 ±5.4 | 39.3 ± 8.1 | 40.2 ± 9.5 | 51.3 ± 17.2 |
Values represent the mean ± standard error; ‘a’ and ‘b’ represent statistically significant differences in relation to control and piperitone, respectively (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test).
aAll aphids were included in the analysis; if an aphid did not show a phloem phase, the value of the phloem-related parameter was shown as zero.
bn = 12.
cn = 7.
dOnly aphids that showed a phloem phase (at least E1), phloem sap ingestion phase (E2), or sustained phloem sap ingestion phase (E2 > 10 min), respectively, were included in the analysis.
en = 11.
fn = 6.
gn = 10.
hn = 4.
in = 9.