| Literature DB >> 26132506 |
Aleksandra Grudniewska1, Marek Kłobucki1, Katarzyna Dancewicz2, Maryla Szczepanik3, Beata Gabryś2, Czesław Wawrzeńczyk1.
Abstract
Two racemic and two enantiomeric pairs of new δ-hydroxy-γ-lactones based on the p-menthane system were prepared from racemic and optically active cis- and trans-piperitols. The Johnson-Claisen rearrangement of the piperitols, epoxidation of the γδ-unsaturated esters, and acidic lactonization of the epoxy esters were described. The structures of the compounds were confirmed spectroscopically. The antifeedant activities of the hydroxy lactones and racemic piperitone were evaluated against three insect pests: lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer); Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say); and peach-potato aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulz.). The chemical transformation of piperitone by the introduction of a lactone moiety and a hydroxy group changed its antifeedant properties. Behavioral bioassays showed that the feeding deterrent activity depended on the insect species and the structure of the compounds. All hydroxy lactones deterred the settling of M. persicae. Among chewing insects, the highest sensitivity showed A. diaperinus adults.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26132506 PMCID: PMC4488555 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Synthesis of hydroxy lactones 6a-c.
Fig 2Synthesis of hydroxy lactones 11a-c.
Feeding deterrent activity of piperitone and the hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) against Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer).
| Compound | Deterrence coefficients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae | Adults | |||||
| A | R | T | A | R | T | |
|
| −4.76 ab | 25.07 a | 20.31 a | 12.24 a | 69.21 b | 81.45 a |
|
| 11.98 ab | 43.51 a | 54.49 ab | 92.58 c | 20.73 a | 111.23 a |
|
| 31.54 b | 86.18 b | 117.72 b | 76.85 bc | 72.38 b | 149.23 ab |
|
| 20.15 ab | 26.15 a | 46.30 ab | 51.23 ab | 67.62 b | 118.85 a |
|
| −19.53 a | 13.68 a | −5.85 a | 93.61 c | 78.28 b | 171.89 b |
|
| 4.47 ab | 48.14 a | 52.61 ab | 77.58 bc | 61.44 b | 139.02 ab |
|
| 14.20 ab | 31.82 a | 46.02 ab | 94.09 c | 86.20 b | 180.29 b |
Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). A, absolute coefficient (no-choice test); R, relative coefficient (choice test); T, total coefficient (T = A + R). Means followed by the same letters within each column are not significantly different (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests, p < 0.05).
Fig 3Effects of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) on the feeding of Alphitobius diaperinus larvae and adults in no-choice tests.
Data are expressed as percentages of control consumption. Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). The standard error is indicated on each bar. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; NS: not significant (Student’s t-test).
Feeding deterrent activity of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) against Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say).
| Compound | Deterrence coefficients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larvae | Adults | |||||
| A | R | T | A | R | T | |
|
| 3.43 abc | 21.9 ab | 25.33 ab | 24.97 bc | 6.38 a | 31.35 abc |
|
| nt | nt | nt | nt | nt | nt |
|
| −18.50 a | 8.42 a | −10.08 a | −11.21 a | 17.52 ab | 6.31 a |
|
| −10.82 ab | 29.61 ab | 18.79 ab | 12.89 ab | 12.36 a | 25.25 ab |
|
| −11.29 ab | 55.88 bc | 44.59 b | 33.63 c | 41.96 bc | 75.59 d |
|
| 25.58 c | 69.53 c | 95.11 c | 18.34 bc | 54.78 c | 73.12 d |
|
| 12.62 bc | 43.47 b | 56.09 b | 15.81 bc | 41.32 bc | 57.13 bcd |
Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). A, absolute coefficient (no-choice test); R, relative coefficient (choice test); T, total coefficient (T = A + R). Means followed by the same letters within each column are not significantly different (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests, p < 0.05).
aNot tested.
Fig 4Effects of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6b,c and 11a-c) on the feeding of Leptinotarsa decemlineata larvae and adults in no-choice tests.
Data are expressed as percentages of control consumption. Values represent the means of four replicates, each set by using ten larvae or adults (n = 40). The standard error is indicated on each bar. *** p < 0.001; NS: not significant (Student’s t-test).
Fig 5Relative index of deterrence (DI) of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6a-c and 11a-c) 1, 2, and 24 h after application.
Asterisks (*) indicate statistically significant biological activity according to the Student's t-test results (p < 0.05); DI < 0, attractant; DI > 0, deterrent (n = 8 replicates, 20 viviparous apterous females/replicate).
Effects of piperitone and hydroxy lactones (6b and 11a-c) on probing activities of Myzus persicae (Sulz.).
| EPG parameter | Control | Piperitone | 6b | 11a | 11b | 11c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Total duration of nonprobing (min) | 23.1 ± 8.1 | 35.9 ± 8.4 | 29.9 ± 5.1 | 28.3 ± 7.7 | 32.4 ± 8.5 | 68.8 ± 15.4 |
| Total duration of pathway (min) | 193.6 ± 29.7 | 232.0 ± 22.7 | 337.9 ± 29.5 | 203.0 ± 36.2 | 280.9 ± 35.0 | 257.1 ± 37.0 |
| Total duration of the phloem phase (min) | 214.2 ± 45.9 | 192.2 ± 30.7 | 80.4 ± 32.0 | 241.9 ± 39.9 | 144.7 ± 37.1 | 119.3 ± 37.1 |
| Total duration of the phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 212.0 ± 45.8 | 189.5 ± 30.6 | 78.1 ± 31.9 | 231.0 ± 38.8 | 142.5 ± 37.2 | 116.6 ± 37.2 |
| Total duration of derailed stylet activities (min) | 0.0 | 5.7 ± 5.7 | 5.9 ± 5.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.8 ± 8.8 |
| Duration of xylem sap uptake (min) | 49.1 ± 29.8 | 14.1 ± 9.1 | 25.9 ± 13.1 | 6.8 ± 2.9 | 22.1 ± 12.5 | 26.1 ± 15.6 |
| Proportion of the phloem phase in total probing (%) | 46.3 ± 9.6 | 42.7 ± 6.7 | 17.7 ± 6.9 | 53.0 ± 8.4 | 31.7 ± 8.0 | 28.3 ± 8.1 |
| Mean duration of nonprobing (min) | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | ± 0.1 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.6 |
| No. of probes | 6.8 ± 1.6 | 19.1 ± 3.9 | 27.6 ± 5.5 | 12.3 ± 2.4 | 15.9 ± 4.1 | 22.0 ± 4.0 |
| No. of short probes (pathway < 3 min) | 1.3 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 1.8 | 10.9 ± 3.8 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 7.1 ± 2.5 | 9.3 (±2.6) |
| Duration of first probe (min) | 94.1 ± 52.3 | 7.3 ±5.1 | 30.6 ± 10.9 | 33.7 ± 13.0 | 69.4 ± 40.1 | 66.2 ± 40.4 |
| Mean duration of a probe (min) | 144.6 ± 46.5 | 34.2 ± 5.7 | 19.7 ± 3.3 | 59.9 ± 12.6 | 100.6 ± 39.8 | 62.0 ± 38.3 |
|
| ||||||
| Proportion of salivation in the total phloem phase (%) | 12.1 ± 8.9 | 2.9 ± 1.5 | 16.3 ± 10.4 | 5.7 ± 2.6 | 4.3 ± 2.1 | 18.8 ± 9.9 |
| No. of probes to the first phloem phase | 6.0 ± 1.4 | 12.3 ± 3.3 | 12.8 ± 4.1 | 6.6 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 12.2 ± 4.0 |
| Duration of the shortest pathway wave before the phloem phase (min) | 36.6 ± 6.1 | 33.6 ± 5.5 | 15.2 ± 3.3 | 20.9 ± 5.7 | 27.6 ± 7.7 | 41.7 ± 15.0 |
| Duration of nonprobe period before the first phloem phase (min) | 22.1 ± 8.7 | 26.0 ± 8.2 | 15.6 ± 5.7 | 18.7 ± 7.4 | 14.0 ± 4.2 | 34.1 ± 14.9 |
| Time from the first probe to first phloem phase (min) | 160.4 ± 34.2 | 167.1 ± 34.8 | 195.7 ± 71.2 | 154.0 ± 34.2 | 148.9 ± 35.2 | 186.2 ± 46.5 |
| Time from the beginning of probing to the first phloem phase (min) | 43.8 ± 5.6 | 40.6 ± 6.1 | 18.6 ± 4.5 | 26.8 ± 5.6 | 30.0 ± 7.5 | 45.2 ± 14.4 |
| Duration of the first phloem phase (min) | 152.7 ± 55.4 | 27.3 ± 11.8 | 53.5 ± 27.9 | 154.8 ± 43.6 | 102.1 ± 42.5 | 77.9 ± 40.2 |
| No. of probes after the first phloem phase | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 6.8 ± 3.5 | 14.5 ± 8.7 | 5.7 ± 1.8 | 10.8 ± 4.7 | 11.0 ± 3.1 |
| No. of probes (< 3 min) after the first phloem phase | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 1.3 | 6.8 ± 5.1 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 2.9 | 5.0 ± 1.8 |
|
| ||||||
| No. of phloem sap ingestion phases | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 2.8 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 3.7 ± 0.8 |
| Mean duration of phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 173.5 ± 51.2 | 56.8 ± 12.8 | 34.3 ± 13.6 | 131.0 ± 37.1 | 73.5 ± 32.2 | 81.1 ± 43.8 |
| Time from the first probe to first phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 161.0 ± 34.2 | 168.0 ± 34.7 | 211.6 ± 76.4 | 172.4 ± 33.3 | 149.5 ± 35.2 | 159.0 ± 39.5 |
| Time from the beginning of probing to the first phloem sap ingestion phase (min) | 44.4 ± 5.7 | 41.4 ± 6.1 | 21.9 ± 3.9 | 36.7 ± 7.8 | 30.7 ± 7.4 | 48.1 ± 15.8 |
| No. of sustained phloem sap ingestion phases (> 10 min) | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.3 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.5 |
| Time from the first probe to first sustained phloem sap ingestion phase (10 min) (min) | 206.8 ± 37.3 | 157.7 ± 31.9 | 114.2 ± 69.8 | 155.9 ± 31.5 | 209.0 ± 44.6 | 158.0 ± 37.2 |
| Time from the beginning of that probe to first sustained phloem sap ingestion phase (10 min) (min) | 43.2 ± 4.7 | 52.2 ± 7.7 | 21.1 ±5.4 | 39.3 ± 8.1 | 40.2 ± 9.5 | 51.3 ± 17.2 |
Values represent the mean ± standard error; ‘a’ and ‘b’ represent statistically significant differences in relation to control and piperitone, respectively (p < 0.05, Mann-Whitney U test).
aAll aphids were included in the analysis; if an aphid did not show a phloem phase, the value of the phloem-related parameter was shown as zero.
bn = 12.
cn = 7.
dOnly aphids that showed a phloem phase (at least E1), phloem sap ingestion phase (E2), or sustained phloem sap ingestion phase (E2 > 10 min), respectively, were included in the analysis.
en = 11.
fn = 6.
gn = 10.
hn = 4.
in = 9.