| Literature DB >> 26132163 |
Xian-Ge Hu1, Yuqing Jin1, Xiao-Ru Wang2, Jian-Feng Mao1, Yue Li1.
Abstract
Chinese thuja (Platycladus orientalis) has a wide but fragmented distribution in China. It is an important conifer tree in reforestation and plays important roles in ecological restoration in the arid mountains of northern China. Based on high-resolution environmental data for current and future scenarios, we modeled the present and future suitable habitat for P. orientalis, evaluated the importance of environmental factors in shaping the species' distribution, and identified regions of high risk under climate change scenarios. The niche models showed that P. orientalis has suitable habitat of ca. 4.2×106 km2 across most of eastern China and identified annual temperature, monthly minimum and maximum ultraviolet-B radiation and wet-day frequency as the critical factors shaping habitat availability for P. orientalis. Under the low concentration greenhouse gas emissions scenario, the range of the species may increase as global warming intensifies; however, under the higher concentrations of emissions scenario, we predicted a slight expansion followed by contraction in distribution. Overall, the range shift to higher latitudes and elevations would become gradually more significant. The information gained from this study should be an useful reference for implementing long-term conservation and management strategies for the species.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26132163 PMCID: PMC4488561 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Environmental parameters used to predict the potential geographic distribution of Platycladus orientalis.
| Code | Name | Resolution | Unit | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bio1 | Annual mean air temperature | 30″×30″ | °C×10 |
|
| Bio2 | Mean diurnal air temperature range | 30″×30″ | °C×10 |
|
| Bio3 | Isothermality | 30″×30″ | ×100 |
|
| Bio4 | Air temperature seasonality | 30″×30″ | ×100 |
|
| Bio5 | Max air temperature of the warmest month | 30″×30″ | °C×10 |
|
| Bio12 | Annual precipitation | 30″×30″ | mm |
|
| Bio14 | Precipitation of the driest month | 30″×30″ | mm |
|
| Bio15 | Precipitation seasonality (coefficient of variation) | 30″×30″ | mm |
|
| FRS | Ground-frost frequency | 30″×30″ |
| |
| GDD | Growing degree days | 0.5°×0.5° | day |
|
| SC | Soil organic carbon | 0.5°×0.5° |
| |
| SpH | Soil pH | 0.5°×0.5° |
| |
| VAP | Vapor pressure | 0.5°×0.5° | hPa |
|
| WET | Wet-day frequency | 0.5°×0.5° |
| |
| UVB1 | Annual mean UV-B | 30″×30″ | J m-2 •day-1 |
|
| UVB2 | UV-B seasonality | 30″×30″ | J m-2 •day-1 |
|
| UVB3 | mean UV-B of lightest month | 30″×30″ | J m-2 •day-1 |
|
| UVB4 | mean UV-B of lowest month | 30″×30″ | J m-2 •day-1 |
|
Fig 1Current species distribution model and the core distributional shifts under different climate scenario/year for Platycladus orientalis.
A, The occurrence and current species distribution model (SDM) for Platycladus orientalis. B, the core distributional shifts under different climate scenario/year combination. Black dot indicates the geometric center of suitable area under current climate condition; orange dot and red dot indicate the geometric centers of future suitable areas of 2050 and 2070 under the climate scenario of RCP2.6; wathet dot and blue dots indicate the geometric centers of future suitable areas of 2050 and 2070 under the climate scenario of RCP8.5, and the arrows depicting magnitude and direction of predicted change through time.
Fig 2Response curves for important environmental predictors in the species distribution model for Platycladus orientalis.
Fig 3Future species distribution models (SDMs) and their spatial shifts for Platycladus orientalis under climate change scenarios RCP2.6 and RCP8.5.
A, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in the year 2050. B, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in 2070. C, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2050. D, SDM for P. orientalis under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2070. E, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in the year 2050. F, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP2.6 in 2070. G, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2050. H, Comparison between the current SDM and the SDM under future climate scenario RCP8.5 in 2070.
Dynamics of changes in suitable habitat area for Platycladus orientalis under four combinations of future climate scenario/year.
| Future climate scenario/year combination | Area (×106 km2) | Proportion of area (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Future | Loss | Gain | Unchanged | Total | Loss | Gain | Unchanged | Total | |
| RCP2.6–2050 | 4.31 | 0.26 | 0.35 | 3.96 | 0.096 | 6.21 | 8.35 | 93.79 | 2.15 |
| RCP2.6–2070 | 4.27 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 3.93 | 0.054 | 6.77 | 8.03 | 93.23 | 1.26 |
| RCP8.5–2050 | 4.27 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 3.75 | 0.037 | 11.39 | 12.26 | 88.61 | 0.87 |
| RCP8.5–2070 | 4.08 | 0.82 | 0.68 | 3.4 | -0.14 | 19.43 | 16.08 | 80.57 | -3.36 |
1,2Negative values indicate suitable habitat area contractions.