BACKGROUND: In chronic Chagas disease (ChD), impairment of cardiac autonomic function bears prognostic implications. Phase‑rectification of RR-interval series isolates the sympathetic, acceleration phase (AC) and parasympathetic, deceleration phase (DC) influences on cardiac autonomic modulation. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated heart rate variability (HRV) as a function of RR-interval to assess autonomic function in healthy and ChD subjects. METHODS: Control (n = 20) and ChD (n = 20) groups were studied. All underwent 60-min head-up tilt table test under ECG recording. Histogram of RR-interval series was calculated, with 100 ms class, ranging from 600-1100 ms. In each class, mean RR-intervals (MNN) and root-mean-squared difference (RMSNN) of consecutive normal RR-intervals that suited a particular class were calculated. Average of all RMSNN values in each class was analyzed as function of MNN, in the whole series (RMSNNT), and in AC (RMSNNAC) and DC (RMSNNDC) phases. Slopes of linear regression lines were compared between groups using Student t-test. Correlation coefficients were tested before comparisons. RMSNN was log-transformed. (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Correlation coefficient was significant in all regressions (p < 0.05). In the control group, RMSNNT, RMSNNAC, and RMSNNDC significantly increased linearly with MNN (p < 0.05). In ChD, only RMSNNAC showed significant increase as a function of MNN, whereas RMSNNT and RMSNNDC did not. CONCLUSION: HRV increases in proportion with the RR-interval in healthy subjects. This behavior is lost in ChD, particularly in the DC phase, indicating cardiac vagal incompetence.
BACKGROUND: In chronic Chagas disease (ChD), impairment of cardiac autonomic function bears prognostic implications. Phase‑rectification of RR-interval series isolates the sympathetic, acceleration phase (AC) and parasympathetic, deceleration phase (DC) influences on cardiac autonomic modulation. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated heart rate variability (HRV) as a function of RR-interval to assess autonomic function in healthy and ChD subjects. METHODS: Control (n = 20) and ChD (n = 20) groups were studied. All underwent 60-min head-up tilt table test under ECG recording. Histogram of RR-interval series was calculated, with 100 ms class, ranging from 600-1100 ms. In each class, mean RR-intervals (MNN) and root-mean-squared difference (RMSNN) of consecutive normal RR-intervals that suited a particular class were calculated. Average of all RMSNN values in each class was analyzed as function of MNN, in the whole series (RMSNNT), and in AC (RMSNNAC) and DC (RMSNNDC) phases. Slopes of linear regression lines were compared between groups using Student t-test. Correlation coefficients were tested before comparisons. RMSNN was log-transformed. (α < 0.05). RESULTS: Correlation coefficient was significant in all regressions (p < 0.05). In the control group, RMSNNT, RMSNNAC, and RMSNNDC significantly increased linearly with MNN (p < 0.05). In ChD, only RMSNNAC showed significant increase as a function of MNN, whereas RMSNNT and RMSNNDC did not. CONCLUSION: HRV increases in proportion with the RR-interval in healthy subjects. This behavior is lost in ChD, particularly in the DC phase, indicating cardiac vagal incompetence.
Chagas disease (ChD) is a major cause of cardiomyopathy in Latin America. It has been
estimated that 8–11 million people are currently infected by Trypanosoma
cruzi worldwide, potentially becoming a significant healthcare-related
problem in Europe and in the United States due to migration [1,2]. In chronic
ChD, autonomic dysfunction has been associated with impairment of both parasympathetic
and sympathetic limbs[3-5], with prognostic implications[6].Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis is a powerful and simple method for assessing
autonomic influence on the sinus node and risk stratification in many cardiac
diseases[7,8]. On routine clinical assessment, parameters in time domain are
usually estimated during a predefined time sequence of normal-to-normal
RR-intervals . Among the parameters usually employed,
root-mean-squared difference (RMSNN) is particularly useful, as it
expresses the amount of energy associated with data variability[7]. However, none of these indexes distinguish between vagal and
sympathetic effects.Recently, an approximate isolation of distinct autonomic contribution on heart rate (HR)
has been possible by assessing the capability of RR-interval series to
accelerate (AC) or decelerate (DC), representing sympathetic and parasympathetic
contributions, respectively. To further accomplish this task, it was initially detected
that if a particular RR-interval changed relative to the previous one,
the corresponding RR- interval was separated in a new series [9,10].In healthy subjects, it has been demonstrated that HRV indices tended to increase as
RR- intervals enlarged [11,12]. On the other hand,
this relationship may be lost during a disease state and may further precipitate some
forms of ventricular arrhythmia, such as long QT syndrome, and ischemic
cardiomyopathy[13]. Thus, the aims of this study
were (i) to assess RMSNN index on AC and DC phases of
RR-interval series in order to isolate sympathetic and
parasympathetic effects, respectively, and (ii) to correlate RMSNN and
mean RR- intervals (MNN) to assess heart rate
dependence of autonomic modulation index in chronic ChD.
Methods
Study population
ECG signals were extracted from an existing high resolution ECG database [14]. The study protocol was approved by the
Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho Ethics Committee and informed
consent was obtained from each volunteer. A group of gender-matched 20 healthy
sedentary participants [Control group, (mean age ± SD)
51.1 ± 17.6 years] and 20 subjects with chronic ChD (Chagas group, 55
± 10.3 years) were studied. Chronic ChD subjects were enrolled to the study
based on spontaneous demand. Due to the exploratory nature of the study, the number
of participants was arbitrarily defined and equally distributed between groups.According to surface ECG data analysis, in ChD group, seven had normal ECG. Among 13
subjects with abnormal ECG, nine showed left atrial overload based on Morris
criteria, nine had left anterior fascicular block, nine had complete right bundle
branch block and one had first degree AV block. Two subjects showed isolated
supraventricular tachycardia and four showed isolated ventricular premature
beats.Additionally, all participants met the following criteria: (i) no intake of
nutritional supplements or potential ergogenic aids of any type (e.g., exogenous
anabolic androgenic steroids); (ii) non-smokers; (iii) normal blood pressure; (iv)
non-diabetic; (v) no history of alcohol addiction; (vi) no history of thyroid
dysfunction; and (vii) not taking medications that affect cardiac electrical
properties and/or autonomic function.
Signal acquisition and processing
All subjects underwent 60-min head-up tilt test (HUTT) under modified Westminster
protocol [15] at 70° and continuous
high-resolution ECG recording in an acclimatized (27°C) and quiet room. Subjects were
oriented to withhold exercise for 48 h before the exam, fast for at least 4 h, and
avoid taking caffeine-containing beverages on the day of the exam. Before ECG
recording, subjects remained in the supine position for at least 5 min in order to
reduce orthostatic autonomic memory on spontaneous RR- interval
variations[16,17].ECG signal acquisition periods were characterized by 10 min of supine rest followed
by 40-min HUTT and another 10-min supine rest. Accordingly, HRV was expected to be
influenced by two predominant autonomic inputs: parasympathetic input during supine
rest, and sympathetic input during tilt[7].High-resolution ECG signals were acquired using modified bipolar Frank
XYZ orthogonal leads [18].
Digital data were processed with custom-made pattern recognition software[19-21]. The analysis of the HRV was done by extraction of the normal
RR- intervals, after detection of the QRS complex using a
low-pass triangular filter. Any RR- interval that exhibited more
than 20% change from the previous RR-interval were excluded, as they
were likely to be related to measurement noise or ectopic beats[21,22].
Instantaneous RR-interval analysis
The RR- interval histogram was constructed for each individual
series and split into 100-ms width classes, ranging from 600–1100 ms. For each
histogram class, and respective to each RR-interval series,
mean (MNN) and root-mean-square diference
(RMSNN) of consecutive normal RR-intervals suiting a
particular class were calculated. Only the pairs of consecutive normal
RR-intervals for individual series that were inside a particular
class of the RR histogram were analyzed together.For a particular histogram class (class) of the i
series, containing
N
RR -intervals, calculation of the mean
(M) and the
root-mean-squared difference
(RMS) of the normal
RR -intervals was performed as follows:For each histogram, classes with intervals of 30 or less were excluded to avoid bias
due to lack of statistical precision.The values of the variables M and
RMS were aggregated to the
respective histogram class. The ensemble mean (MNN
) and root-mean-squared difference
(RMSNN) of RR-
intervals for each histogram class, weighed by the respective degree‑of‑freedom
(η), were calculated according to:
Instantaneous AC and DC analysis
RR- interval histograms in AC and DC phases were also built
following the procedures described above; RMSNN in AC
(RMSNN) and RMSNN
in DC (RMSNN) phases were calculated
accordingly. To further accomplish this task, data points were initially isolated as
acceleration (AC) or deceleration (DC) capacities. If a particular
RR-interval increased relative to the previous one, a DC interval
occurred. As the instantaneous RR‑interval increased, it represented
a parasympathetic action (DC; lozenge symbols in Figure 1). Conversely, a sympathetic effect on the RR-
interval was represented whenever the RR‑interval decreased relative
to the previous one, and AC interval was defined (AC; represented by circle symbols
in Figure 1).
Figure 1
Deceleration and Acceleration anchor points are represented in RR-intervals
samples that were derived from an ECG recording. RR-interval histogram is
represented on the right
Deceleration and Acceleration anchor points are represented in RR-intervals
samples that were derived from an ECG recording. RR-interval histogram is
represented on the right
Statistical analysis
The RMSNN and MNN of each subject were pooled and
averaged on a class-by-class basis in the control and ChD groups.
RMSNN was analyzed in the whole series
(RMSNN) as well as in the AC and
DC phases. Regression lines were analyzed and angular coefficient was compared
between ChD and control groups using non-paired Student’s t-test. Correlation
coefficients (r) were tested before each test. Due to strong
asymmetry in their probability density functions, the RMSNN
variables were log-transformed before analysis to fit appropriately in the parametric
statistical analysis. All tests were considered significant at α level
< 0.05.
Results
Table 1 shows the linear correlation coefficient
(r) and respective angular coefficient (slope) of
the regression line between MNN and other each pooled variable. The
r-values were significant in all regression lines (p
< 0.05).
Table 1
Correlation of parameters: MNN vs. Variables
Group
RMSNNT
RMSNNAC
RMSNNDC
Control
r
0.96 *
0.99 *
0.99 *
slope
0.0011 *
0.0012 *
0.0008 *
ChD
r
-0.55 *
0.96 *
-0.75 *
slope
-0.0002
0.0010 *
-0.0003
p < 0.05.
Correlation of parameters: MNN vs. Variablesp < 0.05.The log-transformed pooled RMSNN (T, AC, and DC), as a function of
pooled MNN, were presented for each group (Figure 2). RMSNN were
significantly different in both groups, whereas, in the control group,
RMSNN,
RMSNN, and
RMSNN significantly increased
proportionally to MNN (p < 0.05); in the ChD group,
only RMSNN
showed significant increase as a function of
MNN, whereas RMSNN
andRMSNN did not.
Figure 2
Comparison of control and ChD groups in terms of logtransformed of pooled
RMSNNT (a), RMSNNAC (b), and RMSNNDC (c) as a
function of pooled RR-intervals (MNN), and the respective angular coefficient
(slope) of regression line. p value refers to Student’s t-test significance for
comparing slopes. Correlation was significant for all regression lines. (See text
for details)
Comparison of control and ChD groups in terms of logtransformed of pooled
RMSNNT (a), RMSNNAC (b), and RMSNNDC (c) as a
function of pooled RR-intervals (MNN), and the respective angular coefficient
(slope) of regression line. p value refers to Student’s t-test significance for
comparing slopes. Correlation was significant for all regression lines. (See text
for details)Based on the total number of RR- intervals suiting a particular
histogram class, the percent value (mean ± SD) of RR-interval
pairs rejected as not pertaining to the same histogram class was 31.7% ± 21.7%
for the control group and 27.0% ± 14.7% for ChD. Figure 3 shows histograms of RR- interval pairs for each
group according to the AC and DC phases, respectively.
Figure 3
RR-interval pairs histograms assessed for each group and phase: acceleration phase
(a) and deceleration phase (b).
RR-interval pairs histograms assessed for each group and phase: acceleration phase
(a) and deceleration phase (b).
Discussion
Cardiac autonomic dysfunction, characterized mainly by parasympathetic depression, is an
important aspect of human ChD[3-5]. The observation of marked autonomic dysfunction
in association with normality of most ventricular echocardiographic variables suggested
that there was no clear relationship between autonomic and ventricular function[23]. Additionally, autonomic dysfunction seemed to be
a primary phenomenon, preceding ventricular mechanical changes in chronic ChD
evolution[6,24,25].In a previous study[22], DC index adaptation was
proposed to measure cardiac vagal modulation by a phase-rectified signal averaging
(PRSA) procedure[10,11] that was effective in distinguishing athletes
from sedentary healthy volunteers. It was hypothesized that depending on vagal stimulus
intensity, the rate of ascent of the RR-interval series would change
accordingly, determining slope variation. Thus, the strongest vagal stimulus determined
the steepest slope and vice-versa, potentially affecting the DC value. Although PRSA has
been originally developed to risk-stratify subjects post myocardial infarction[10], its application in assessing physiological
conditions that are strongly related to vagal activity modulation has been shown to be
highly pertinent and feasible as well.In the present study, the behavior of RR- intervals was analyzed by
grouping time domain RMSNN parameters calculated at different histogram
classes. This procedure made it possible to cluster beats under the influence of similar
instantaneous time factors. Additionally, assessment of the capacity of
RR-interval series to accelerate or decelerate enabled the isolation
of both sympathetic (AC phase) and parasympathetic (DC phase) contributions on the
RR- intervals series.The essential point of this study was to stratify HR and HRV according to instantaneous
RR-interval difference using a parameter that expresses energy
(RMSNN) from all series and to isolate sympathetic and
parasympathetic contributions. Also, it introduced novel information that represents
insights into the dependence of autonomic modulation on heart rate in a population of
chronic ChD.In the control group, HRV (RMSNN,
RMSNN and
RMSNN) was strongly dependent on
the instantaneous RR- interval, confirming the previous findings of
Benchimol-Barbosa et al.[13]. In
the physiological range of RR- interval variation (600–1100 ms), RMSNN
was lower during head-up tilt and higher during supine position, representing
sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic influences on HRV, respectively. Moreover, it
was notable that RR-interval variation had average inter-beat “jumps”
that were proportional to the average RR-intervals (Figure 2). This relation was also represented by a
strong linear dependence between RMSNN and MNN
(r > 0.96).On the other hand, in the ChD group, only
RMSNN showed significant increase as a
function of MNN(p < 0.05), which assessed the
isolated contribution of sympathetic nervous system on HRV.
RMSNN, which assessed the isolated
parasympathetic influence, not only had its mean value lower than the control group, but
also showed no variations with changes in mean RR- interval. These
findings indicate that not only vagal modulation was reduced in this population, but
also the ability of parasympathetic system to modulate RR-intervals at
different heart rates throughout a wide range of RR-intervals analyzed.
We named this later observation as parasympathetic incompetence.This study has its limitations, including a relatively small sample size and application
of the method using two physiologically well-defined groups. Although the groups were
not matched by age, both had their mean age above 40 years. Assessment of left
ventricular systolic function was not carried out in the present study; however, in
Chagas disease, there was no clear relationship between autonomic and ventricular
function[24]. Further studies are needed to
confirm present findings.
Conclusion
In subjects with chronic Chagas disease, a significant reduction of autonomic modulation
of the heart is observed throughout a wide physiological range of
RR-intervals.Additionally, in healthy sedentary subjects, RMSNN increases
proportionally with RR-interval. This relationship is not observed in
chronic Chagas disease, particularly during parasympathetic stimulation phase,
indicating parasympathetic incompetence in modulating heart rate variation in this
scenario.
Authors: Paulo Roberto B Barbosa; José Barbosa-Filho; Carlos Alberto M de Sá; Eduardo C Barbosa; Jurandir Nadal Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: L Gallo Júnior; J Morelo Filho; B C Maciel; J A Marin Neto; L E Martins; E C Lima Filho Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 1987-12 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Axel Bauer; Jan W Kantelhardt; Petra Barthel; Raphael Schneider; Timo Mäkikallio; Kurt Ulm; Katerina Hnatkova; Albert Schömig; Heikki Huikuri; Armin Bunde; Marek Malik; Georg Schmidt Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-05-20 Impact factor: 79.321