Literature DB >> 26131244

Short versus long intramedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Zhi Li1, Yueju Liu1, Yi Liang1, Changping Zhao1, Yingze Zhang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates between short and long intramedullary nails used for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients over 65 years of age.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 156 patients aged more than 65 years with femoral intertrochanteric fractures from December 2010 to December 2012 was performed. The patients were allocated to two groups: those treated with long nail (n=59) and short nail (n=97). Relevant patient variables and medical comorbidities were collected. Medical comorbidities were evaluated according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and medical records were also reviewed for age, sex, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, length of stay, time to fracture union, hip pain, Harris Hip Score 1 year postoperatively, and failure rates. The failure rate was defined as periprosthetic fracture or reoperation requiring removal or revision of nail. Variables were statistically compared between the two groups, with statistical significance at P<0.05.
RESULTS: Patients treat with long nails and short nails were comparable for all assessed clinical variables (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between these groups in intraoperative blood loss, time to fracture union and Harris Hip Score at 1 year postoperatively (P>0.05). The long nail group had significantly less failure rate (0/59) and hip pain rate (3/59) than those with short nail (3/97 and 13/97, respectively) (P < 0.05), but the operative time was significantly longer in the former (60.60 ± 11.43 minutes) than the latter (53.10 ± 8.51 minutes) group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the long and short intramedullary nails are the optional internal fixation choices for femoral intertrochanteric fracture in the aged patients older than 65 years. But the long nail could avoid the refracture of femur and reduced postoperative hip pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral intertrochanteric fracture; intramedullary nail

Year:  2015        PMID: 26131244      PMCID: PMC4483876     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  7 in total

1.  Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2).

Authors:  Christopher Boone; Kelly N Carlberg; Denise M Koueiter; Kevin C Baker; Jason Sadowski; Patrick J Wiater; Gregory P Nowinski; Kevin D Grant
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  High failure rate of trochanteric fracture osteosynthesis with proximal femoral locking compression plate.

Authors:  C Wirtz; F Abbassi; D S Evangelopoulos; S Kohl; K A Siebenrock; A Krüger
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Short versus long cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in patients older than 65 years.

Authors:  Conor Kleweno; Jordan Morgan; James Redshaw; Mitchel Harris; Edward Rodriguez; David Zurakowski; Mark Vrahas; Paul Appleton
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 4.  Antirotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  L Shen; Y Zhang; Y Shen; Z Cui
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Treatment of pertrochanteric fractures (OTA 31-A1 and A2): long versus short cephalomedullary nailing.

Authors:  Zhiyong Hou; Thomas R Bowen; Kaan S Irgit; Michelle E Matzko; Cassondra M Andreychik; Daniel S Horwitz; Wade R Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  [Unstable pertrochanteric femur fractures. Failure rate, lag screw sliding and outcome with extra- and intramedullary devices (PCCP, DHS and PFN)].

Authors:  M Knobe; R Münker; R M Sellei; B Schmidt-Rohlfing; H J Erli; C S Strobl; F U Niethard
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 0.923

Review 7.  Similar mortality rates in hip fracture patients over the past 31 years.

Authors:  Simran Mundi; Bharadwaj Pindiprolu; Nicole Simunovic; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.717

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  How are peri-implant fractures below short versus long cephalomedullary nails different?

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Brett P Salazar; Jamie Furness; James E Feng; Malcolm R DeBaun; Sean T Campbell; Justin F Lucas; William W Cross; Philipp Leucht; Kevin D Grant; Michael J Gardner; Julius A Bishop
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  Early Clinical Outcomes of Short versus Long Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Jlm Loh; Dme Huang; J Lei; W Yeo; M K Wong
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2021-07

3.  Short or long intramedullary devices for hip fracture? A systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Piers R J Page; William E C Poole; Kanishk Shah; Piyush K Upadhyay
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-29

4.  Is the modified Harris hip score valid and responsive instrument for outcome assessment in the Indian population with pertrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Keyur Akbari; Amit J Patel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-03

Review 5.  Comparison of a twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN) with a single screw derotation cephalomedullary nail (proximal femoral nail antirotation): a systematic review and meta-analysis for intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Leo Nherera; Paul Trueman; Alan Horner; Tracy Watson; Alan J Johnstone
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Clinical Outcomes of Intermediate-Length Cephalomedullary Nails for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Repair in Older Adults.

Authors:  Paul A Enns; Sue M Nyberg; Gina M Berg; Morgan A Galliart; Brent D Sarauer; Andrew A Scheer; Bradley R Dart; Chad M Corrigan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-05-21

7.  Clinical outcomes following long versus short cephalomedullary devices for fixation of extracapsular hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gabriel Kai Yang Tan; Christoph Sheng Chong; Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparative study of intertrochanteric fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail with and without distal interlocking screws.

Authors:  Nadeem A Lil; Vipul R Makwana; Tirth D Patel; Arjav R Patel
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18

9.  Comparison of reamed long and short intramedullary nail constructs in unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Laura E Blum; Michael A Yee; Cyril Mauffrey; James A Goulet; Aaron M Perdue; Mark E Hake
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2020-05-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.