Literature DB >> 26131049

Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis.

Dan-Dan Li1, Le-Hang Guo1, Hui-Xiong Xu1, Chang Liu1, Jun-Mei Xu1, Li-Ping Sun1, Jian Wu1, Bo-Ji Liu1, Lin-Na Liu1, Xiao-Hong Xu2.   

Abstract

This meta-analysis was aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions. The databases of PubMed, Web of Science(TM), WanFang, Vip, SinoMed and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for all studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of ARFI including virtual touch tissue quantification (VTQ) and virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI). All the studies were published prior to Mar. 21, 2014. The studies published in English or Chinese were collected. A total of 11 studies, including 1,408 breast lesions from 1,245 women, were analyzed. The values of summary sensitivity and summary specificity were 0.843 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.811-0.872) and 0.932 (95% CI: 0.913-0.948) for VTQ of ARFI, and 0.864 (95% CI: 0.799-0.914) and 0.882 (95% CI: 0.832-0.922) for VTI of ARFI, respectively. Subgroup analysis excluding mucinous carcinoma and carcinoma in situ showed higher summary sensitivity (0.877 95% CI: 0.835-0.911), higher summary specificity (0.943 95% CI: 0.921-0.960) and lower heterogeneity (I(2)=23.5%). The cut-off values for shear wave velocity of VTQ ranged widely from 2.89 to 6.71 m/s, while the VTI ranged narrowly from 1.37 to 1.66. In general, ARFI elastography seems to be a good method for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions. However, its usefulness for identifying breast mucinous carcinoma and breast carcinoma in situ is limited. VTI seems to be more reliable and repeatable than VTQ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast lesion; acoustic radiation force impulse; elastography; meta-analysis; ultrasound

Year:  2015        PMID: 26131049      PMCID: PMC4484950     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  22 in total

1.  Shear wave elasticity imaging: a new ultrasonic technology of medical diagnostics.

Authors:  A P Sarvazyan; O V Rudenko; S D Swanson; J B Fowlkes; S Y Emelianov
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results.

Authors:  Kathryn Nightingale; Stephen McAleavey; Gregg Trahey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lazarus; Martha B Mainiero; Barbara Schepps; Susan L Koelliker; Linda S Livingston
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language?

Authors:  Daniel Vanel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imaging of breast lesions.

Authors:  Wei Meng; Guangchen Zhang; Changjun Wu; Guozhu Wu; Yan Song; Zhaoling Lu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  In vivo cardiac, acoustic-radiation-force-driven, shear wave velocimetry.

Authors:  Richard R Bouchard; Stephen J Hsu; Patrick D Wolf; Gregg E Trahey
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.578

7.  A non-invasive modality: the US virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ) for evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Tamaki; Nobumitsu Tamaki; Yoshihiko Kamada; Kano Uehara; Minoru Miyashita; Takanori Ishida; Hironobu Sasano
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Shear wave velocity measurements for differential diagnosis of solid breast masses: a comparison between virtual touch quantification and virtual touch IQ.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; John Benson; Liexiang Fan; Sachiko Isobe
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 10.  A systematic review classifies sources of bias and variation in diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08-17       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  10 in total

1.  The value of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  Wen-Tao Kong; Wei-Jun Zhou; Yin Wang; Xiao-Min Zhuang; Min Wu
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 2.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging in Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions.

Authors:  Jayapriya Jayaraman; Venkatraman Indiran; Kanakaraj Kannan; Prabakaran Maduraimuthu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Modeling Uncertainty of Strain Ratio Measurements in Ultrasound Breast Strain Elastography: A Factorial Experiment.

Authors:  David Rosen; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Quantitative assessment of muscular stiffness in children with cerebral palsy using acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Meltem Ceyhan Bilgici; Tumay Bekci; Yasemin Ulus; Hamit Ozyurek; Omer Faruk Aydin; Leman Tomak; Mustafa Bekir Selcuk
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 6.  Principles of ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  Arinc Ozturk; Joseph R Grajo; Manish Dhyani; Brian W Anthony; Anthony E Samir
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-04

7.  A Comparison of Acoustic Radiation Force-Derived Indices of Cardiac Function in the Langendorff Perfused Rabbit Heart.

Authors:  Maryam Vejdani-Jahromi; Mathew Nagle; Yang Jiang; Gregg E Trahey; Patrick D Wolf
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  A Normalized Shear Deformation Indicator for Ultrasound Strain Elastography in Breast Tissues: An In Vivo Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Bo Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Influence of age, sex, body mass index, alcohol, and smoking on shear wave velocity (p-SWE) of the pancreas.

Authors:  Sabina Stumpf; Heike Jaeger; Tilmann Graeter; Suemeyra Oeztuerk; Julian Schmidberger; Mark Martin Haenle; Wolfgang Kratzer
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-07

Review 10.  Acoustic Radiation Force Based Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Lulu Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.576

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.