Sean Lawrence1, Lyndall M Spencer2, Michael Sinnott1, Robert Eley1. 1. Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia ; The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 2. Emergency Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia ; The University of Queensland School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The transfer of responsibility for patient care across clinical specialties is a complex process. Published and anecdotal data suggest that referrals often fail to meet the needs of one or both parties and that patient focus can be lost during the process. Little is known about the Australian situation. METHODS: To obtain a more complete understanding of the referral process, including the nature of communication in an Australian context, we conducted semistructured interviews in a convenience sample of 25 volunteers. Two established strategies for analyzing qualitative data were used. RESULTS: All respondents considered the following information essential components of a referral: an account of the patient's current condition, a working diagnosis or problem statement and history of the presenting concern, key test results or tests awaiting results, a potential management plan, and any special characteristics of the patient. Respondents acknowledged implied, if not literal, power to accept or reject an emergency department (ED) referral and said the imbalance of power was reinforced when the ED physician was junior to the inpatient clinician. Respondents also noted that in addition to the predominant organizational culture, an independent culture is associated with specific shifts. Foremost among the nonclinical aspects of a referral considered to be important was the timeliness of the contact made to achieve the transition. Respondents also said the success of a referral depended on the speaking and listening abilities of all parties. The individual's motivation to accept or reject a referral can also have an impact on communication. CONCLUSION: Respondents attributed the difficulty of negotiating the transfer of a patient's care across the ED and inpatient interface to three distinct factors: variations in the clinical information required, the culture of the organization and of the clinical team in which the transaction takes place, and the characteristics of the individuals involved in the process. Improving communication skills has the potential to improve patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The transfer of responsibility for patient care across clinical specialties is a complex process. Published and anecdotal data suggest that referrals often fail to meet the needs of one or both parties and that patient focus can be lost during the process. Little is known about the Australian situation. METHODS: To obtain a more complete understanding of the referral process, including the nature of communication in an Australian context, we conducted semistructured interviews in a convenience sample of 25 volunteers. Two established strategies for analyzing qualitative data were used. RESULTS: All respondents considered the following information essential components of a referral: an account of the patient's current condition, a working diagnosis or problem statement and history of the presenting concern, key test results or tests awaiting results, a potential management plan, and any special characteristics of the patient. Respondents acknowledged implied, if not literal, power to accept or reject an emergency department (ED) referral and said the imbalance of power was reinforced when the ED physician was junior to the inpatient clinician. Respondents also noted that in addition to the predominant organizational culture, an independent culture is associated with specific shifts. Foremost among the nonclinical aspects of a referral considered to be important was the timeliness of the contact made to achieve the transition. Respondents also said the success of a referral depended on the speaking and listening abilities of all parties. The individual's motivation to accept or reject a referral can also have an impact on communication. CONCLUSION: Respondents attributed the difficulty of negotiating the transfer of a patient's care across the ED and inpatient interface to three distinct factors: variations in the clinical information required, the culture of the organization and of the clinical team in which the transaction takes place, and the characteristics of the individuals involved in the process. Improving communication skills has the potential to improve patient outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Emergency medicine; patient admission; patient handoff; referral and consultation
Authors: Julie Apker; Larry A Mallak; E Brooks Applegate; Scott C Gibson; Jason J Ham; Neil A Johnson; Richard L Street Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2009-11-27 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Christopher Beach; Dickson S Cheung; Julie Apker; Leora I Horwitz; Eric E Howell; Kevin J O'Leary; Emily S Patterson; Jeremiah D Schuur; Robert Wears; Mark Williams Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Peter C Sprivulis; Julie-Ann Da Silva; Ian G Jacobs; Amanda R L Frazer; George A Jelinek Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Marissa A Hendrickson; Emma N Schempf; Ronald A Furnival; Jordan Marmet; Scott A Lunos; Abraham K Jacob Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2019-04-16