Literature DB >> 26130846

Comparisons of characteristic timescales and approximate models for Brownian magnetic nanoparticle rotations.

Daniel B Reeves1, John B Weaver1.   

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles are promising tools for a host of therapeutic and diagnostic medical applications. The dynamics of rotating magnetic nanoparticles in applied magnetic fields depend strongly on the type and strength of the field applied. There are two possible rotation mechanisms and the decision for the dominant mechanism is often made by comparing the equilibrium relaxation times. This is a problem when particles are driven with high-amplitude fields because they are not necessarily at equilibrium at all. Instead, it is more appropriate to consider the "characteristic timescales" that arise in various applied fields. Approximate forms for the characteristic time of Brownian particle rotations do exist and we show agreement between several analytical and phenomenological-fit models to simulated data from a stochastic Langevin equation approach. We also compare several approximate models with solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation to determine their range of validity for general fields and relaxation times. The effective field model is an excellent approximation, while the linear response solution is only useful for very low fields and frequencies for realistic Brownian particle rotations.

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130846      PMCID: PMC4474943          DOI: 10.1063/1.4922858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Phys        ISSN: 0021-8979            Impact factor:   2.546


  15 in total

1.  Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles.

Authors:  Bernhard Gleich; Jürgen Weizenecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Three-dimensional real-time in vivo magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  J Weizenecker; B Gleich; J Rahmer; H Dahnke; J Borgert
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Magnetic nanoparticle temperature estimation.

Authors:  John B Weaver; Adam M Rauwerdink; Eric W Hansen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Optimizing magnetite nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  R Matthew Ferguson; Kevin R Minard; Amit P Khandhar; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Modeling the Brownian relaxation of nanoparticle ferrofluids: comparison with experiment.

Authors:  Michael A Martens; Robert J Deissler; Yong Wu; Lisa Bauer; Zhen Yao; Robert Brown; Mark Griswold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Simulations of magnetic nanoparticle Brownian motion.

Authors:  Daniel B Reeves; John B Weaver
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Magnetic particle imaging: advancements and perspectives for real-time in vivo monitoring and image-guided therapy.

Authors:  Michele H Pablico-Lansigan; Shu F Situ; Anna Cristina S Samia
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.790

8.  Nonlinear simulations to optimize magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia.

Authors:  Daniel B Reeves; John B Weaver
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Monodispersed magnetite nanoparticles optimized for magnetic fluid hyperthermia: Implications in biological systems.

Authors:  Amit P Khandhar; R Matthew Ferguson; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Magnetic nanoparticle sensors.

Authors:  Isaac Koh; Lee Josephson
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  6 in total

1.  Combined Néel and Brown rotational Langevin dynamics in magnetic particle imaging, sensing, and therapy.

Authors:  Daniel B Reeves; John B Weaver
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Mixed Brownian alignment and Néel rotations in superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle suspensions driven by an ac field.

Authors:  Saqlain A Shah; Daniel B Reeves; R Matthew Ferguson; John B Weaver; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys       Date:  2015-09-24

3.  Nanoimprinted multifunctional nanoprobes for a homogeneous immunoassay in a top-down fabrication approach.

Authors:  Hubert Brueckl; Astrit Shoshi; Stefan Schrittwieser; Barbara Schmid; Pia Schneeweiss; Tina Mitteramskogler; Michael J Haslinger; Michael Muehlberger; Joerg Schotter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Nonequilibrium Dynamics of Magnetic Nanoparticles with Applications in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Carolyn Shasha; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 32.086

5.  Magnetic control of heterogeneous ice nucleation with nanophase magnetite: Biophysical and agricultural implications.

Authors:  Atsuko Kobayashi; Masamoto Horikawa; Joseph L Kirschvink; Harry N Golash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Generalized Scaling and the Master Variable for Brownian Magnetic Nanoparticle Dynamics.

Authors:  Daniel B Reeves; Yipeng Shi; John B Weaver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.