Literature DB >> 26130611

Changes in computed tomography values of mandibular condyle and temporomandibular joint disc position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Koichiro Ueki1, Kunio Yoshizawa2, Akinori Moroi2, Ran Iguchi2, Akihiko Kosaka2, Hiroumi Ikawa2, Yuriko Saida2, Asami Hotta2, Takamitsu Tsutsui2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate change in computed tomography (CT) value of condyle and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) setback surgery, retrospectively. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 76 patients (152 condyles) who underwent bilateral SSRO setback surgery. They were divided into 2 groups (43 symmetric patients and 33 asymmetric patients). CT values (pixel values) of 5 sites of the condyle and condylar width, length, horizontal angle were measured pre-operatively and 1 year post-operatively. Disc position was classified as anterior disc displacement, anterior type, fully covered type and posterior type, preoperatively and postoperatively using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
RESULTS: In maximum CT value at the center of the condyle, post-operative value was significantly lower than pre-operative value bilaterally (Deviation side: P = 0.0003, Non-deviation side: P = 0.0003) in asymmetry group. In minimum CT value at the center of the condyle, the post-operative value was significantly lower than the pre-operative value bilaterally (Deviation side: P = 0.0309, Non-deviation side: P = 0.0004) in the symmetry group. With regard to maximum CT value at the lateral site of the condyle in the deviation side, the value for the anterior disc displacement group was significantly larger than that of the posterior type pre-operatively (P = 0.0123). CT value of the anterior disc displacement group was significantly larger than those of some other areas pre- and post-operatively (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: This study suggested that CT value of condylar bone changes after 1 year in SSRO and anterior disc displacement may partially affect the CT value of the condyle in the TMJ in mandibular prognathism patients.
Copyright © 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography (CT) value; Condyle; Disc position; Sagittal split ramus osteotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130611     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  9 in total

1.  Condylar surface CT value in sagittal plane before and after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Koichiro Ueki; Kunio Yoshizawa; Akinori Moroi; Ran Iguchi; Akihiko Kosaka; Hiroumi Ikawa; Asami Hotta; Takamitsu Tsutsui; Yuki Saito; Kenichi Fukaya; Ryota Hiraide; Akihiro Takayama; Tatsuya Tsunoda
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-02-28

2.  Condylar Reshape in Orthognathic Surgery: Morphovolumetric and Densitometric Analysis Based on 3D Imaging and Digital Workflow.

Authors:  Vincenzo Abbate; Giovanni Audino; Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona; Marco Friscia; Paola Bonavolontà; Carmelo Lo Faro; Umberto Committeri; Carlos Navarro Cuéllar; Giorgio Iaconetta; Luigi Califano
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

3.  Radiographic evaluation of condylar positioning in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Wanderley da Silva Félix Junior; Leandro Eduardo Klüppel; Delson João da Costa; Ângela Fernandes; Rafaela Scariot; Nelson Luis Barbosa Rebellato
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on the stress distributions in the temporomandibular joints of the patients with facial asymmetry under symmetric occlusions.

Authors:  Jing-Heng Shu; Jie Yao; Yuan-Li Zhang; Desmond Y R Chong; Zhan Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on morphologic parameters of temporomandibular joint in patients with mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  He-Di Ma; Jing-Heng Shu; Xu-Zhao Deng; Zhan Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Evaluation of Condylar Positional, Structural, and Volumetric Status in Class III Orthognathic Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Jevgenija Podčernina; Ilga Urtāne; Pertti Pirttiniemi; Ģirts Šalms; Oskars Radziņš; Jolanta Aleksejūnienė
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  In-House, Open-Source 3D-Software-Based, CAD/CAM-Planned Mandibular Reconstructions in 20 Consecutive Free Fibula Flap Cases: An Explorative Cross-Sectional Study With Three-Dimensional Performance Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Paul Kilbertus; Florian D Grill; Matthias Schwarz; Jochen Weitz; Markus Nieberler; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Andreas M Fichter
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Evaluation of Condylar Position after Orthognathic Surgery for Treatment of Class II Vertical Maxillary Excess and Mandibular Deficiency by Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Shoaleh Shahidi; Emad Bahramnejad; Hamidreza Arabion
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-12

9.  Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.

Authors:  Sabit Demircan; Erdoğan Utku Uretürk; Ayşegül Apaydın; Sinan Şen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.