Literature DB >> 26130230

Clinical Outcomes of Computed Tomography-Based Volumetric Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer.

Daniel R Simpson1, Daniel J Scanderbeg2, Ruben Carmona2, Riley M McMurtrie2, John Einck2, Loren K Mell2, Michael T McHale3, Cheryl C Saenz3, Steven C Plaxe3, Terry Harrison3, Arno J Mundt2, Catheryn M Yashar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: A report of clinical outcomes of a computed tomography (CT)-based image guided brachytherapy (IGBT) technique for treatment of cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventy-six women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB to IVA cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 2007 and 2014 were treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy followed by high-dose-rate (HDR) IGBT. All patients underwent planning CT simulation at each implantation. A high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) encompassing any visible tumor and the entire cervix was contoured on the simulation CT. When available, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at implantation to assist with tumor delineation. The prescription dose was prescribed to the HRCTV.
RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 17 months. Thirteen patients (17%) had an MRI done before brachytherapy, and 16 patients (21%) were treated without MRI guidance. The mean EBRT/IGBT sum 2-Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) delivered to the 90% volume of the HRCTV was 86.3 Gy. The mean maximum EQD2s delivered to 2 cm(3) of the rectum, sigmoid, and bladder were 67.5 Gy, 66.2 Gy, and 75.3 Gy, respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of local, locoregional, and distant failure were 5.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4%-14.8%), 15.1% (95% CI: 5.4%-29.4%), and 24.3% (95% CI: 12.1%-38.9%), respectively. The 2-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 75% (95% CI, 61%-91%) and 73% (95% CI, 60%-90%), respectively. Twenty-nine patients (38%) experienced grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity, with 5 cases of acute grade 3 toxicity and no grade ≥ 4 toxicities. One patient experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. No other late grade ≥ 3 events were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest report to date of CT/MRI-based IGBT for the treatment of cervical cancer. The results are promising, with excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Further investigation is needed to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of this treatment.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26130230     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.04.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Verification of Guiding Needle Placement by Registered Ultrasound Image During Combined Intracavitary/Interstitial Gynecologic Brachytherapy.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Ziqi Liu; Shan Jiang; Qingsong Pang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  In-room computed tomography-based brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: results of a 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Tatsuya Ohno; Shin-Ei Noda; Noriyuki Okonogi; Kazutoshi Murata; Kei Shibuya; Hiroki Kiyohara; Tomoaki Tamaki; Ken Ando; Takahiro Oike; Yu Ohkubo; Masaru Wakatsuki; Jun-Ichi Saitoh; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  The use of trans-applicator intracavitary ultrasonography in brachytherapy for cervical cancer: phantom study of a novel approach to 3D image-guided brachytherapy.

Authors:  Tomoaki Tamaki; Kazunori Miyaura; Toshihiro Murakami; Yu Kumazaki; Yoshiyuki Suzuki; Takashi Nakano; Shingo Kato
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-03-15

4.  Model assessment of individual tumor control rate and adverse effects in comparing locally advanced cervical cancer treatment using intracavitary with and without interstitial brachytherapy.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chi Kuo; Keyur J Mehta; Ravindra Yaparpalvi; Viswanathan Shankar; William Bodner; Madhur Garg; Amanda Rivera; Wolfgang A Tomé; Shalom Kalnicki
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-12-20

Review 5.  Evolution of Brachytherapy Applicators for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ankur Mourya; Lalit Mohan Aggarwal; Sunil Choudhary
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 6.  A practical review of magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation and management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Emma C Fields; Elisabeth Weiss
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Impact of brachytherapy technique (2D versus 3D) on outcome following radiotherapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kris Derks; Jacco L G Steenhuijsen; Hetty A van den Berg; Saskia Houterman; Jeltsje Cnossen; Paul van Haaren; Katrien De Jaeger
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2018-02-22

8.  Standard Chemoradiation and Conventional Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Is It Still Applicable in the Era of Magnetic Resonance-Based Brachytherapy?

Authors:  Prachi Mittal; Supriya Chopra; Sidharth Pant; Umesh Mahantshetty; Reena Engineer; Jaya Ghosh; Sudeep Gupta; Yogesh Ghadi; Siji Menachery; Jamema Swamidas; Lavanya Gurram; Shyam Kishore Shrivastava
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2018-07

9.  Automatic segmentation and applicator reconstruction for CT-based brachytherapy of cervical cancer using 3D convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Daguang Zhang; Zhiyong Yang; Shan Jiang; Zeyang Zhou; Maobin Meng; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.