Literature DB >> 26129686

Nitrous oxide as a humane method for piglet euthanasia: Behavior and electroencephalography (EEG).

Jean-Loup Rault1, Nikki Kells2, Craig Johnson2, Rachel Dennis3, Mhairi Sutherland4, Donald C Lay3.   

Abstract

The search for humane methods to euthanize piglets is critical to address public concern that current methods are not optimal. Blunt force trauma is considered humane but esthetically objectionable. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is used but criticized as aversive. This research sought to: 1) evaluate the aversiveness of inhaling nitrous oxide (N2O; 'laughing gas') using an approach-avoidance test relying on the piglet's perspective, and 2) validate its humaneness to induce loss of consciousness by electroencephalography (EEG). The gas mixtures tested were N2O and air (90%:10%; '90 N'); N2O, oxygen and air (60%:30%:10%; '60 N'); and CO2 and air (90%:10%; '90 C'). Experiment 1 allowed piglets to walk freely between one chamber filled with air and another prefilled with 60 N or 90 N. All piglets exposed to 60 N lasted for the 10 min test duration whereas all piglets exposed to 90 N had to be removed within 5 min because they fell recumbent and unresponsive and then started to flail. Experiment 2 performed the same test except the gas chamber held N2O prefilled at 25%, 50%, or 75% or CO2 prefilled at 7%, 14%, or 21%. The test was terminated more quickly at higher concentrations due to the piglets' responses. Time spent ataxic was greater in the middle concentration gradients. Flailing behavior tended to correlate with increasing concentrations of CO2 but not N2O. Experiment 3, using the minimal anesthesia model, showed that both 90 N and 90 C induced isoelectric EEG, in 71 and 59 s respectively, but not 60 N within 15 min. The EEG results together with the observed behavioral changes reflect differences in the animal's perceptive experience. The implications for animal welfare are that N2O is much less aversive than CO2, and 90% N2O can euthanize piglets.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aversive; Carbon dioxide; Death; Gas; Swine; Welfare

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26129686     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  5 in total

1.  The effect of light level, CO2 flow rate, and anesthesia on the stress response of mice during CO2 euthanasia.

Authors:  Karin Powell; Kelly Ethun; Douglas K Taylor
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  Evaluation of physical euthanasia for neonatal piglets on-farm.

Authors:  Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa; Troy J Gibson; Steffan Edward Octávio Oliveira; Neville George Gregory; Arlei Coldebella; Luigi Faucitano; Charli Beatriz Ludtke; Liziè Peréirã Buss; Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Electrocution as an alternative euthanasia method to blunt force trauma to the head followed by exsanguination for non-viable piglets.

Authors:  Johannes Husheer; Matthias Luepke; Peter Dziallas; Karl-Heinz Waldmann; Alexandra von Altrock
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  A Two-Step Process of Nitrous Oxide before Carbon Dioxide for Humanely Euthanizing Piglets: On-Farm Trials.

Authors:  Rebecca K Smith; Jean-Loup Rault; Richard S Gates; Donald C Lay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Behavioral Response of Weaned Pigs during Gas Euthanasia with CO2, CO2 with Butorphanol, or Nitrous Oxide.

Authors:  Enver Çavuşoğlu; Jean-Loup Rault; Richard Gates; Donald C Lay
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.