Literature DB >> 26127035

Total variation minimization filter for DBT imaging.

Ana M Mota1, Nuno Matela1, Nuno Oliveira1, Pedro Almeida1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Compressed sensing (CS) is a new approach in medical imaging which allows a sparse image to be reconstructed from undersampled data. Total variation (TV) based minimization algorithms are the one CS technique that has achieved great success due to its virtue of preserving edges while reducing image noise. The purpose of this work is to implement and evaluate the performance of a TV minimization filter able to increase the signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images.
METHODS: Assuming a Poisson noise model, the authors present a practical methodology, based on Rudin, Osher, and Fatemi model, which directly applies a TV minimization filter to real phantom and clinical DBT images. Different moments of filter application (before and after image reconstruction) and the suitable Lagrange multiplier (λ) to be used in filter equation are studied. Also, the relationship between background standard deviation (σB) of unfiltered images and optimal λ values is determined, in order to maximize the SDNR. Qualitative and quantitative analyses are conducted between unfiltered and filtered images and between the different moments of filter application. The proposed methodology is also tested with one clinical DBT data set.
RESULTS: Using phantom data, when the filter is applied to the projections, the authors observed a decrease of 31.34% in TV and an increase of 5.29% and 5.44% in SDNR and full width at half maximum (FWHM), respectively. When applied after reconstruction, a decrease of 35.48% and 2.59% was achieved for TV and FWHM, respectively, and an increase of 8.32% for SDNR. For each moment of filter application, the optimal λ value found through a comprehensive study was λ = 85 and λ = 60 when the filter is applied before and after reconstruction, respectively. The best fit found for the relationship between σB and the corresponding λ values that allowed the highest filtered SDNR was the logarithmic adjustment. The difference between the λ values obtained by the first approach and the logarithmic adjustment ranges from 0.11% (filter applied before reconstruction) to 2.54% (filter applied after reconstruction). On the other hand, a decrease of 37.63% and 2.42% in TV and FWHM, respectively, and an increase of 24.39% in SDNR were obtained when the filter is applied to clinical data. This great minimization is present through a visual inspection of unfiltered and filtered clinical images, where areas with higher noise level become smoother while preserving edges and details of the structures.
CONCLUSIONS: An optimized digital filter for TV minimization in DBT imaging has been presented. The reliability of a logarithmic relation found between σB and λ values was confirmed and can be used in future work. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses performed in a clinical DBT image confirmed the relevance of this approach in improving image quality in DBT imaging. The results obtained are very encouraging about increasing SDNR in a short time and preserving the principal variations in image, the structures' boundary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26127035     DOI: 10.1118/1.4919680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  3 in total

1.  Nonlinear Inversion MR Elastography With Low-Frequency Actuation.

Authors:  Wei Zeng; Scott W Gordon-Wylie; Likun Tan; Ligin Solamen; Matthew D J McGarry; John B Weaver; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automatic Classification of Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Whole Images for the Presence of Microcalcification Clusters Using Deep CNNs.

Authors:  Ana M Mota; Matthew J Clarkson; Pedro Almeida; Nuno Matela
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-08-29

3.  Reduced anatomical clutter in digital breast tomosynthesis with statistical iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  John W Garrett; Yinsheng Li; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.