Literature DB >> 26126970

Phase II randomized clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens with weekly paclitaxel or eribulin followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in women with locally advanced HER2-negative breast cancer: NSABP Foundation Study FB-9.

Jame Abraham1, André Robidoux, Antoinette R Tan, Steven Limentani, Keren Sturtz, Ibrahim Shalaby, Hope Alcorn, Marc E Buyse, Norman Wolmark, Samuel A Jacobs.   

Abstract

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a good setting in which to monitor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, to downsize the tumor (which facilitates breast-conserving surgery), and to test newer agents in untreated patients. Eribulin (E) has shown activity in patients who have undergone previous taxane, anthracycline, and capecitabine treatment. We aimed to evaluate the neoadjuvant use of E followed by doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) in patients with HER2-negative LABC, using as a control a randomized group of women who received weekly paclitaxel (WP). Fifty women with LABC were accrued January-August 2013. Patients were randomized (1:2) to receive either WP (N = 19) for 12 treatments or E (N = 31) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by AC every 3 weeks for 4 cycles before surgery. 17/19 patients who took WP and 25/30 who took E completed all cycles. Patients were evaluated by clinical examination and breast MRI at baseline and after completion of E or WP. Surgical pCR in breast and lymph nodes was determined by a local pathologist following chemotherapy. Forty-nine patients received ≥1 dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are included in this analysis. Forty-eight underwent surgery; one had disease that was inoperable (on E) and is included as no-pCR patient. 17/19 of these patients who took WP completed 12 doses; 28/30 on E completed 4 cycles. Six discontinued treatment on WP, E, or AC. Both treatments were well tolerated. pCR on WP = 5/19(26 %) and on E = 5/30(17 %). Both regimens were equally well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. pCR did not suggest higher activity with E than with other standard regimens in these LABC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26126970     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3466-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mechanism, safety and efficacy of three tyrosine kinase inhibitors lapatinib, neratinib and pyrotinib in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Cheng Xuhong; Xiao-Wei Qi; Yi Zhang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Eribulin in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer: Implications of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  Victor C Kok
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 3.  Efficacy of eribulin in breast cancer: a short report on the emerging new data.

Authors:  Gelareh Eslamian; Caroline Wilson; Robin J Young
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens in treatment of breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.

Authors:  Mona Pathak; Sada Nand Dwivedi; S V S Deo; Bhaskar Thakur; Vishnubhatla Sreenivas; G K Rath
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-26

5.  Neoadjuvant eribulin mesylate following anthracycline and taxane in triple negative breast cancer: Results from the HOPE study.

Authors:  Serena Di Cosimo; Nicla La Verde; Anna Moretti; Marina Elena Cazzaniga; Daniele Generali; Giulia Valeria Bianchi; Luigi Mariani; Valter Torri; Flavio Crippa; Biagio Paolini; Gianfranco Scaperrotta; Maria Carmen De Santis; Massimo Di Nicola; Giovanni Apolone; Alessandro Gulino; Claudio Tripodo; Mario Paolo Colombo; Secondo Folli; Filippo de Braud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A phase II study of sequential treatment with anthracycline and taxane followed by eribulin in patients with HER2-negative, locally advanced breast cancer (JBCRG-17).

Authors:  Ippei Fukada; Yoshinori Ito; Naoto Kondo; Shoichiro Ohtani; Masaya Hattori; Eriko Tokunaga; Nobuki Matsunami; Kohjiro Mashino; Taijiro Kosaka; Masahiko Tanabe; Daisuke Yotsumoto; Kosho Yamanouchi; Masataka Sawaki; Masahiro Kashiwaba; Hidetaka Kawabata; Katsumasa Kuroi; Satoshi Morita; Shinji Ohno; Masakazu Toi; Norikazu Masuda
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  Eribulin in Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Umang Swami; Umang Shah; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.