The Peptidoglycan-Binding Protein SjcF1 Influences Septal Junction Function and Channel Formation in the Filamentous Cyanobacterium Anabaena.

UNLABELLED: Filamentous, heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria exchange nutrients and regulators between cells for diazotrophic growth. Two alternative modes of exchange have been discussed involving transport either through the periplasm or through septal junctions linking adjacent cells. Septal junctions and channels in the septal peptidoglycan are likely filled with septal junction complexes. While possible proteinaceous factors involved in septal junction formation, SepJ (FraG), FraC, and FraD, have been identified, little is known about peptidoglycan channel formation and septal junction complex anchoring to the peptidoglycan. We describe a factor, SjcF1, involved in regulation of septal junction channel formation in the heterocyst-forming cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120. SjcF1 interacts with the peptidoglycan layer through two peptidoglycan-binding domains and is localized throughout the cell periphery but at higher levels in the intercellular septa. A strain with an insertion in sjcF1 was not affected in peptidoglycan synthesis but showed an altered morphology of the septal peptidoglycan channels, which were significantly wider in the mutant than in the wild type. The mutant was impaired in intercellular exchange of a fluorescent probe to a similar extent as a sepJ deletion mutant. SjcF1 additionally bears an SH3 domain for protein-protein interactions. SH3 binding domains were identified in SepJ and FraC, and evidence for interaction of SjcF1 with both SepJ and FraC was obtained. SjcF1 represents a novel protein involved in structuring the peptidoglycan layer, which links peptidoglycan channel formation to septal junction complex function in multicellular cyanobacteria. Nonetheless, based on its subcellular distribution, this might not be the only function of SjcF1. IMPORTANCE: Cell-cell communication is central not only for eukaryotic but also for multicellular prokaryotic systems. Principles of intercellular communication are well established for eukaryotes, but the mechanisms and components involved in bacteria are just emerging. Filamentous heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria behave as multicellular organisms and represent an excellent model to study prokaryotic cell-cell communication. A path for intercellular metabolite exchange appears to involve transfer through molecular structures termed septal junctions. They are reminiscent of metazoan gap junctions that directly link adjacent cells. In cyanobacteria, such structures need to traverse the peptidoglycan layers in the intercellular septa of the filament. Here we describe a factor involved in the formation of channels across the septal peptidoglycan layers, thus contributing to the multicellular behavior of these organisms.

INTRODUCTION

Cyanobacteria are Gram-negative bacteria with a cell envelope composed of a plasma membrane, a peptidoglycan (PG) layer, and an outer membrane, where the latter two are often referred to as the cell wall with the space between the plasma and the outer membranes referred to as the periplasm. Some cyanobacteria, such as Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 (here Anabaena) are filamentous, growing as chains of cells, including vegetative cells, active in oxygenic photosynthesis-dependent CO2 fixation, and heterocysts. The latter are specialized cells for nitrogen fixation and are formed from vegetative cells under nitrogen deprivation (1). The outer membrane of filamentous cyanobacteria does not enter the septum between two consecutive cells (2–5). In contrast, the A1-type PG layer (6) surrounds each cell in the filament (7), while the layers of adjacent cells might interact in the septum (8). The width of the PG layer is about 12 nm (7), and PG in Anabaena is composed of more than one layer (9). Remarkably, polysaccharides composed of glucosamine, mannosamine, galactosamine, mannose, and glucose are covalently linked to the PG of cyanobacteria, as shown for the unicellular Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6714 (10), a property typical for Gram-positive bacteria. However, the degree of covalent cross-links between PG chains is rather comparable to that in Gram-negative bacteria (9). These observations led to the proposal that cells of Anabaena are like unicellular Gram-positive bacteria with a plasma membrane and a thick PG layer arranged in an outer membrane sack (7).

The continuous outer membrane determines the presence of a continuous periplasm, which has been discussed to allow exchange of molecules along the filament, as exemplified by the green fluorescent protein (GFP) (11). Since the periplasm is thought to form a gel-like texture (12), it would represent one possible route for metabolite exchange or signaling between heterocysts and vegetative cells (9, 11). However, the continuous nature of the periplasmic space has been questioned (13). From the structural point of view, the PG layer might represent a barrier that slows down movement of molecules as large as GFP but perhaps not of small molecules, such as some metabolites (7, 11).

An alternative mode for intercellular molecular exchange might involve septal junction complexes (14), also termed microplasmodesmata, septosomes, or “channels connecting cells,” which have been identified between cells of filamentous cyanobacteria (e.g., see references 7 and 15–18). The size of the inner diameter of the septal junction complexes was determined by potassium permanganate staining and is about 6 nm (7). Proteins involved in septal junction complex formation have been classified as “cell-cell joining” proteins, and mutants of the corresponding genes show a filament fragmentation phenotype (5, 19, 20). Today, the SepJ (also known as FraG [19, 20]), FraC, and FraD (5, 21, 22) proteins have been identified as possible components of septal junction complexes.

Recently, the question concerning integration of the PG layer and septal junction complex formation has been addressed. If septal junction proteins from adjacent cells interact with each other, they should traverse the septal PG layer(s). The presence of perforations, also termed nanopores, in septal PG discs has been demonstrated for Nostoc punctiforme recently (23). The periplasmic amidase AmiC2 has been shown to be involved in the formation of such structures (23). Based on cell-cell communication analysis, an ortholog of AmiC2 in Anabaena, encoded by alr0092 and annotated AmiC1, has also been found to influence septal junction formation (24). Thus, those perforations can be the channels through which septal junction complexes traverse the septal PG. However, a possible regulation of the dimension of the septal junction channel is unknown. Here we describe a further protein factor encoded by all1861 that influences septal junction channel formation in Anabaena. This factor restricts the size of the channels in the PG layer, leading to its annotation as peptidoglycan septal junction channel formation protein no. 1 (SjcF1).

RESULTS

SjcF1 proteins are present in filamentous cyanobacteria.

SjcF1 encoded by sjcF1 (all1861) was found in the proteomic analysis of cell wall fractions from Anabaena (25, 26). The gene is the last one of a gene cluster (Fig. 1A; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). It encodes a protein with a transmembrane segment (not shown in Fig. 1B), an SH3 domain, known to be involved in protein-protein interactions (27), and two PG binding domains (Fig. 1B). The occurrence of the gene in such a genomic organization is limited to Anabaena and Anabaena variabilis, while the corresponding gene in Nostoc punctiforme, a related cyanobacterium, is downstream of a gene coding for a response regulator/receiver protein (Fig. 1A). A global search for proteins with similar domain architecture showed its presence in 12 organisms in addition to Anabaena (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Only in Spirulina subsalsa were two forms identified. All cyanobacteria with such a protein are multicellular and filamentous. We also identified sequences containing both domains characterizing SjcF1 in Gram-positive Actinobacteridae (Fig. 1C), but they contain a “rare lipoprotein A-like double-psi β-barrel” (Pfam, DPBB_1 [28]) not found in SjcF1. Moreover, 34 sequences from Gram-positive bacteria of the phylum Firmicutes were identified, again mostly with additional domains characteristic for hydrolases. Thus, a protein with the molecular architecture of SjcF1 is specific for filamentous cyanobacteria, but in Gram-positive bacteria that have a thick PG layer, proteins with a similar but not identical domain architecture to that of SjcF1 exist, which might fulfill similar functions.

FIG 1 

SjcF1 interacts with peptidoglycan. (A) Genomic organization of sjcF1 (Anabaena) and its homologues ava4755 (Anabaena variabilis) and npunF2504 (Nostoc punctiforme). Gray indicates genes with comparable sequence in Anabaena and A. variabilis. Genes indicated in white are distinct between the three species. For clarity, only one succeeding gene of Nostoc punctiforme is shown. (B) Functional domains for SjcF1 are indicated. (C) The numbers of sequences containing an SH3 domain (PF08239) and a PG binding domain (PF01471) (first column) and the numbers of additional domains (next columns [Pfam code]) are given. Taxonomic groups where no sequences are identified are excluded. (D) His-tagged SjcF1 (top), SjcF1 without the 2nd PG binding domain (2nd panel), the 2nd PG binding domain of SjcF1 (3rd panel), or Toc34ΔTM (bottom panel) were centrifuged (lane 1, pellet P1), and supernatant was incubated with PG (+PG). After centrifugation (lane 2, supernatant S1), the pellet was washed and centrifuged (lanes 3 and 4, pellet P2 and supernatant S2, respectively). Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunodecorated with anti-His tag. Lanes 5 to 8 show the experiment without addition of PG. The experimental scheme is shown on the left.

The peptidoglycan binding domain of SjcF1 is functional.

The functionality of the predicted PG binding domains needed experimental confirmation (Fig. 1D). We isolated PG from Anabaena and heterologously expressed SjcF1 with an N-terminal His tag (Materials and Methods). SjcF1 binding to PG was analyzed by incubation of the soluble recombinant protein with purified PG, and the bound protein was recovered by centrifugation (P2, lane 3). We observed that SjcF1 binds to PG (upper panel), because it pellets in the presence (lane 3) but not in the absence of PG (lane 7). The same result was observed for a variant of the protein not containing PG2 (SjcF1ΔPG2) or consisting of PG2 only (SjcF1PG2; lane 3 versus lane 7). The specificity was further confirmed by the absence of an interaction between PG and the chloroplast translocon component Toc34, used as a negative control (29). We conclude that SjcF1 directly interacts with the PG layer.

sjcF1 is expressed in an environmentally controlled manner.

The transcript abundance of sjcF1 was estimated by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. We observed a transcript in cells grown in BG11 medium suggesting that sjcF1 is expressed under standard growth conditions (Fig. 2A, lane 1). However, the transcript abundance was reduced upon nitrogen starvation (lanes 2 and 3), although it recovered to some extent 12 h after nitrogen step down (lanes 4 and 5). To investigate whether sjcF1 expression is reduced in heterocysts, which comprise about 5 to 10% of all cells in the filament (1), we created the strain AFS-PDGF-sjcF1, in which the GFP gene is fused to a 740-bp fragment of the 5′ end and upstream region of sjcF1, including in frame its start codon (Table 1). This construct was incorporated into a neutral site of the Anabaena genome, the nucA-nuiA region of the α megaplasmid (see Materials and Methods). GFP fluorescence was observed within the cytoplasm of vegetative cells, whereas it was reduced in heterocysts (Fig. 2B). Quantification revealed that the fluorescence intensity in heterocysts was on average about half of the one found in vegetative cells (Fig. 2C). These observations suggest that sjcF1 expression is dependent on environmental conditions. To explore this further, we incubated Anabaena in BG11 medium with different compositions (Fig. 2D). Again the overall expression after growth in BG110 medium (which lacks combined nitrogen) was reduced compared to that in cells grown in BG11 medium (bar 1). Exclusion of copper, iron, zinc, or citric acid from the growth medium (bars 2 to 5) did not result in a significant change of transcript levels. In contrast, an enhanced copper concentration (5 µM [a 16-fold higher concentration than in BG11]) resulted in a moderate increase, and an enhanced iron (1 mM [45-fold higher than in BG11]) or zinc (5 µM [7-fold higher than in BG11]) content enforced an at least 4-fold increase of transcript abundance (bars 6 to 8). It is known that PG can bind metals with an affinity order of Zn > Fe(III) > Cu (30, 31), and that an excess of such metals leads to PG damage (32). Thus, the observed transcript enrichment under elevated metal concentration is consistent with the hypothesis that SjcF1 is involved in PG maintenance by yet to be discovered means.

FIG 2 

SjcF1 is differentially expressed in different cell types and growth media. (A) mRNA was isolated from Anabaena cells grown in BG11 medium and incubated for the indicated times in BG110 medium, and RT-PCR was performed to amplify sjcF1 (top panel) and rnpB, used as a control (bottom panel). (B) In strain AFS-PDGF-sjcF1, gfp is expressed from the sjcF1 promoter. GFP fluorescence, cyanobacterial autofluorescence, and the bright-field image are shown for a representative filament grown for 24 h in BG110. (C) Average GFP fluorescence from vegetative cells of AFS-PDGF-sjcF1 was used for normalization of fluorescence of individual vegetative cells and heterocysts of the same filament. The box plot shows the normalized fluorescence of vegetative cells (n > 80) and heterocysts (n = 11) from 8 individual filaments. The difference is significant (t test, P < 0.001). (D) mRNA abundance of sjcF1 after 7 days of growth under various conditions was analyzed by qRT-PCR and normalized to the expression in BG11 and the expression of rnpB. Results are averages of ≥3 biological independent replicas (E, expression of sjcF1). The fold change is given on the right. +, presence in typical concentrations; −, BG11 preparation without the indicated substance.

TABLE 1 

Anabaena strains used in this study

Strain	Resistance	Genotype	Properties	Reference
Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120		Wild type		C. P. Wolk
CSR10	Spr Smr	alr4167::pCSV3	Gene interruption by pCSV3 plasmid	52
AFS-I-P24	Spr Smr	alr7361-alr7362::pCSEL24	Gene interruption by pCSEL24 plasmid	55
AFS-I-sjcF1	Spr Smr	all1861::pCSV3	Gene interruption by pCSV3 plasmid	This study
AFS-I-2270	Spr Smr	alr2270::pCSV3	Gene interruption by pCSV3 plasmid	33
CSR27	Spr Smr	alr2458::pCSV3	Gene interruption by pCSV3 plasmid	This study
CSVM34		ΔsepJ	Gene deletion	71
CSVT1		ΔfraC	Gene deletion	21
CSVM141		ΔsepJ ΔfraC ΔfraD	Gene deletion	40
AFS-PDGF-sjcF1	Spr Smr	Pall1861-gfp in nucA-nuiA region	all1861 promoter-GFP fusion	This study

SjcF1 affects the cell wall integrity.

We generated an insertional mutant of sjcF1, strain AFS-I-sjcF1 (Materials and Methods) (Table 1). Southern blot analysis of three independently generated mutant clones and PCR on genomic DNA (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) indicated that chromosomes bearing the insertion were not fully segregated. The heterozygous mutant did not show a growth delay in BG11 medium or a Fox− phenotype (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Guided by the observed PG binding capacity of SjcF1, we investigated the impact of the mutation on cell wall integrity. We analyzed the growth of AFS-I-sjcF1 in the presence of compounds known to affect growth, depending on cell wall integrity (Fig. 3A) (33). A strain with a mutation in the lipid A synthesis gene alr2270 (AFS-I-alr2270) (33) and two control strains (AFS-I-P24 and CSR10; which bear sequences including the C.S3 cassette inserted in unrelated genes [Table 1]) were included in the analysis. For AFS-I-alr2270 and AFS-I-sjcF1, but not for the control strains, we observed a drastic growth reduction in the presence of SDS (Fig. 3A, panel ii) or ampicillin (panel iv). However, for AFS-I-sjcF1, the sensitivity toward lysozyme was not as drastic as in AFS-I-alr2270 (panel iii). This suggests that in AFS-I-sjcF1, outer membrane integrity is affected, but not in the same manner as by altering lipid A synthesis, as previously described (33). Consistently, the overall lipid content of the mutant was not changed compared to that in control cells (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).

FIG 3 

AFS-I-sjcF1 has an altered cell wall functionality. (A) Growth of AFS-I-alr2270 (lane 1), AFS-I-sjcF1 (lane 2), AFS-I-P24 (lane 3), and CSR10 (lane 4) on BG11 plates (i) with 10 µg/ml SDS (ii), 100 µg/ml lysozyme (iii), or 10 µg/ml ampicillin (iv) was inspected after 7 days of incubation. (B) Growth of AFS-I-sjcF1 (lane 1), AFS-I-P24 (lane 2), and Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 (lane 3) on BG11 plates (i) with 10 (ii) or 100 (iii) ng/ml vancomycin was inspected after 7 days of incubation. (C) AFS-I-sjcF1 or Anabaena cells grown in BG11 medium incubated with Van-FL were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Shown is fluorescence of Van-FL (FL) and overlay with autofluorescence (OL). Controls are shown in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material. (D) Van-FL fluorescence at defined cell positions (left) of individual cells of ≥15 different filaments of Anabaena (gray) and AFS-I-sjcF1 (white) recorded with identical settings was quantified. A.U., arbitrary units.

SjcF1 is not involved in the general PG synthesis.

We aimed at PG staining with a fluorescent derivative of vancomycin (Van-FL) to explore the impact of SjcF1 on PG synthesis (23, 34). We realized that AFS-I-sjcF1 is more sensitive to vancomycin than the wild-type strain (Fig. 3B), as growth of the insertional mutant, but not of the control strain AFS-I-P24 or the wild type, was drastically reduced in the presence of 100 ng/ml vancomycin (panel iii). Subsequently we inspected the incorporation of Van-FL into the PG layer (Fig. 3C). We observed staining for both AFS-I-sjcF1 and the Anabaena wild type, and quantification of the incorporated Van-FL yielded very similar distributions for both strains (Fig. 3D). As expected from the juxtaposition of the two PG layers, a 2-fold-higher fluorescence intensity was observed at the cell-cell contact sides (position 3) compared to the filament ends (position 1) or cell sides (position 2) (Fig. 3D).

Next we inactivated the alr2458 gene encoding an alanine racemase putatively involved in PG biosynthesis to judge whether SjcF1 is related to PG synthesis by comparison of the mutant phenotypes (Fig. 4A). Segregation of the insertional mutant of alr2458, strain CSR27, was analyzed by PCR on genomic DNA (Fig. 4A and B). A faint band in strain CSR27 (lane 2) indicates that the strain was not fully segregated. The heterozygous mutant strain CSR27 was sensitive to SDS, proteinase K, and to some extent lysozyme (weak growth in the presence of 30 µg lysozyme/ml [Fig. 4C]), indicating the presence of an envelope with altered permeability. The sensitivity to SDS may imply that outer membrane integrity is affected by an altered PG, but lack of (or low) sensitivity to erythromycin indicates less alteration than in mutants directly affecting outer membrane formation (33). The sensitivity to proteinase K and lysozyme may indicate, on the other hand, the presence of a weak PG because of d-alanine scarcity. Remarkably, whereas CSR27 was sensitive to proteinase K and lysozyme, AFS-I-sjcF1 was not (Fig. 4C). Quantification of labeling with Van-FL yielded a decrease in vancomycin incorporation, as judged from values for filament ends, cell sides, and cell-cell contact sites in the mutant compared to the wild type (P < 0.005) (Fig. 4D). The distinct phenotype of CSR27 supports that Alr2458 but not SjcF1 is involved generally in PG biogenesis.

FIG 4 

CSR27 is a mutant of an alanine racemase influencing peptidoglycan functionality. (A) Schematic representation of the alr2458 locus with indication of plasmid insertion (strain CSR27). Triangles indicate the positions of primers used for strain analysis. (B) PCR analysis of the genetic structure of the alr2458 region in Anabaena (lane 1) and in CSR27 (lane 2) with alr2458 primers, as well as in CSR27 with alr2355 primers used as a positive control for the presence of DNA (lane 3). Black triangle, 1,051 bp; white triangle, 557 bp. (C) Strains CSR10 and AFS-I-sjcF1 were grown on BG11 plates with Sp/Sm (i) containing 50 ng/ml erythromycin (Em [ii]), 20 µg/ml SDS (iii), 30 µg/ml lysozyme (Lys [iv]), or 5 (v) and 20 (vi) µg/ml proteinase K (PK) and photographed after 8 days of incubation. (D) CSR27 filaments grown in BG11 were incubated with Van-FL and analyzed by CLSM. Controls are shown in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material. Shown is Van-FL fluorescence (FL) and the overlay with autofluorescence (OL). The quantification of individual cells (≥15 different filaments) of CSR27 (white) is shown; for comparison, Anabaena (gray) is reproduced from Fig. 3D. A.U., arbitrary units.

The SjcF1 protein is involved in restriction of the peptidoglycan channel.

The distribution of SjcF1 in cells was analyzed with antibodies recognizing the protein followed by immunofluorescence (Fig. 5A and B). The specificity of the antibody was confirmed by immunodecoration of cell lysates and overexpressed protein (Fig. 5C). Despite lack of complete mutant chromosome segregation, no significant content of the protein was found in strain AFS-I-sjcF1, whereas the protein was detectable in the outer rim of wild-type cells. By visual inspection (Fig. 5A) and quantification of the fluorescence of the individual PG layer even in the septum (Fig. 5B), we observed a significantly higher intensity in the septal region than the other cell wall sections. On average, the level in the septal PG of a cell was about 2.1-fold higher than the level in lateral cell walls (Fig. 5B). Thus, septal regions had about 4-fold-higher levels of SjcF1 than lateral walls.

FIG 5 

The septal junction channels in the peptidoglycan layer. (A) AFS-I-sjcF1 (left) or Anabaena (right) was incubated with anti-SjcF1-CY3, and cells were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cyanobacterial autofluorescence (AUF), CY3 signal (CY3), the overlay (OL), and the bright-field image (BFI) are shown. (B) CY3-FL fluorescence of individual cells at positions i and ii (see model on the right) of cells of 5 different filaments of Anabaena was quantified (t test for significance of the difference, P < 0.001). In this case, the signals from the two individual cells in the septum can be separated (A) and were analyzed individually. (C) Immunodecoration with SjcF1 antibodies of cell extracts (1 µg protein) from Anabaena and AFS-I-sjcF1 and of recombinant His-tagged SjcF1 without the 2nd PG binding domain. (D to F) Sacculi from AFS-I-sjcF1 (D [two micrographs shown]), CSR27 (E), and Anabaena (F) grown in BG11 medium were isolated and visualized by electron microscopy. Representative images are shown. (G) Quantitative analysis of channel dimensions from at least two biological independent replicas is presented for 524 septal junction channels of Anabaena, 581 of ASF-I-sjcF1, and 93 of CSR27. Results were binned in 2-nm steps, and the percentage of each bin is shown. Statistical values are given in Table S2 in the supplemental material.

SjcF1 physically interacts with PG (Fig. 1) and is significantly localized in the septal region. Hence, the structure of the PG isolated from AFS-I-sjcF1, CSR27, and Anabaena was analyzed by electron microscopy. Whereas we did not find evidence for an altered structure in the overall sacculus of AFS-I-sjcF1, we realized an altered morphology of the channels (also known as nanopores) found in high-density PG regions thought to be caused by juxtaposition (likely involving chemical interaction) of the PG layers from adjacent cells (23). These perforations (nanopores) may correspond to the channels through which the septal junction complexes traverse the PG layer (7, 23). In strain CSR27 (Fig. 5E) and the wild type (Fig. 5F), the diameter of the channels is rather restricted: on average, 21 nm (sigma from Gaussian distribution, 2.1 nm [Fig. 5G]) and 19 nm (sigma, 3.5 nm), respectively. For AFS-I-sjcF1 already visual inspection revealed a broad distribution of septal junction channel sizes (Fig. 5D). Quantification yielded a significantly different diameter of 29 nm with a very broad distribution (sigma, 8.2 nm; one-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] test) (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

SjcF1 is functionally linked to the septal junction complexes.

Intercellular molecular exchange in Anabaena and the AFS-I-sjcF1 mutant was investigated as transfer of fluorescent calcein analyzed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) (14) (Fig. 6A). Calcein has a diffusion constant of D = 1.5 × 10−6 cm2/s in solution and in endosomes (35, 36). Assuming free diffusion, a recovery time of 0.1 to 0.3 s is expected (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). Consistent with previous reports (14, 21), the membrane provides a resistance for full recovery of fluorescence (Fig. 6B). The estimated exchange coefficient (ec) for the Anabaena wild type was ecwt = 0.033 ± 0.005 s−1 (n = 27), similar to that described previously (14). For the AFS-I-sjcF1 mutant, we observed a reduced recovery rate, ecMT = 0.011 ± 0.003 s−1 (n = 37), and the difference is significant with P < 0.001 (t test). The 3-fold reduction is comparable to the defect observed for a ΔfraG (ΔsepJ) strain (14) and links the function of SjcF1 to that of septal junction complexes allowing the transfer of calcein between cells.

FIG 6 

Relation of SjcF1 to septal junction complexes. (A) Representative time series of calcein recovery in the Anabaena wild-type and AFS-I-sjcF1 strains. The first image is before the bleach pulse; the times after the bleaching are indicated. (B) Recovery rate of calcein fluorescence for a representative measurement in the Anabaena wild-type and AFS-I-sjcF1 strains. (C) Scheme of the topology of SepJ, FraC, FraD, and SjcF1 (see the material in the expanded view) in the plasma membrane (PM) and the periplasm (PG, peptidoglycan). Transmembrane domains in the PM, the coiled-coil domains of SepJ and FraD in the periplasm (grey cylinders), the PG binding domains of SjcF1 (white cylinders), the SH3 domain (dark gray), and the SH3 binding motifs (black) are indicated. (D) Fluorescent-labeled peptide representing the SH3 binding motif of FraC (1, FVEPVLPVPI; K, 12 ± 1 µM) or a mutated version of the SepJ motif (2, PLTSEKSSEP; K, >2 mM) was incubated with increasing concentrations of His-tagged SjcF1. The fluorescent anisotropy was analyzed. For representation, the initial value was subtracted and the curve was normalized to the maximal expected value. The lines indicate the least square fit analysis to the equation F = Fmax × [SjcF1]/(K + [SjcF1]). (E) The average of the β-galactosidase activity of E. coli with plasmid combinations producing the indicated proteins (white bars) and of the controls of either two empty plasmids (producing T18 and T25) or one empty and one fusion protein-encoding plasmid in all combinations possible (black bar) is shown with the standard deviation. Probability values of the t test for significance of the differences are indicated (p).

SepJ, FraC, and FraD (14, 19–22) are possible components of septal junction complexes, which most likely traverse the septal junction channels. An analysis of the transcripts from the coding genes for the three factors in AFS-I-sjcF1 showed a significant increase of abundance compared to the wild type (Table 2). In turn, the transcript of sjcF1 was significantly increased in a mutant of sepJ and a triple mutant of sepJ, fraC, and fraD (Table 2). These observations point toward a functional relationship between septal junction complexes and SjcF1.

TABLE 2 

Transcript abundance of genes involved in septal junction complex formation

Strain	sepJ		fraC		fraD		sjcF1
	ΔΔGb	Foldc	ΔΔGb	Foldc	ΔΔGb	Foldc	ΔΔGb	Foldc
CSVM34 (ΔsepJ)	4 ± 1	0.05d	−1.2 ± 0.5	2.3e	−4.3 ± 0.3	20f	−2.3 ± 0.1	5.1f
CSVT1 (ΔfraC)	−2.3 ± 0.5	5.0f	4 ± 1	0.05d	−2.8 ± 0.2	6.8f	−0.37 ± 0.02	1.3
CSVM141 (ΔsepJ ΔfraC ΔfraD)	4 ± 1	0.05d	4 ± 1	0.05d	5.4 ± 0.3	0.03d	−1.8 ± 0.1	3.5f
AFS-I-sjcF1	−1.3 ± 0.5	2.5e	−2.2 ± 0.5	4.8f	−3.4 ± 0.3	11f	3.2 ± 0.2	0.1d

The transcript abundance for genes encoding septal junction complex proteins and SjcF1 was analyzed by qRT-PCR in BG11-grown cells of the indicated mutant strains. Bold highlights the values with significant changes in comparison to wild type.

Normalized to expression of rnpB.

Fold change in mutant.

Background.

Significant at P < 0.005.

Significant at P < 0.001.

Moreover, utilizing the program SH3-Hunter (37), SH3 binding motifs can be found in FraC (amino acids [aa] 66 to 72 [FVEPVLP]) and SepJ (aa 326 to 331 [PLTPEK]), but not in FraD or AmiC2 (Fig. 6C). We synthesized fluorescent peptides corresponding to the SH3-binding motifs of FraC (FVEPVLPVP) and SepJ (PLTPEKPPEP) and analyzed their interaction with His-tagged SjcF1 by fluorescence anisotropy. We observed a dissociation constant of 12 ± 1 µM for the interaction between SjcF1 and FraC peptide (Fig. 6D). The interaction between SjcF1 and SepJ peptide was certainly of lower affinity, with a dissociation constant of 39 ± 3 µM (see Fig. S4 in the supplemental material). However, an interaction with a SepJ peptide bearing proline-to-serine substitutions (PLTSEKSSEP) was not observed (Fig. 6D), confirming that interaction with the native peptide was significant.

To confirm complex formation in a more in vivo-like situation, we analyzed the interaction between SjcF1 and SepJ, FraC, or FraD by the bacterial two-hybrid system (38). The T18 or T25 complementary fragment of the catalytic subunit of adenylate cyclase was added to the predicted cytoplasmic terminus of SepJ, FraC, SjcF1, or FraD. The β-galactosidase activity was determined in Escherichia coli strains carrying the indicated T18 and T25 fusion protein-encoding plasmids (Fig. 6E, white bars). For the control, E. coli strains with plasmids producing T18 and/or T25 without fusions were used (black bar). Significant interaction was obtained for SjcF1 and SepJ and for SjcF1 and FraC, but not for SjcF1 and FraD or for SjcF1 with itself. Nonetheless, these interactions are weaker than the very strong SepJ self-interaction (39) used as a positive control (Fig. 6E). This is consistent with the low affinity determined by fluorescence anisotropy measurements and the presence of the SH3 binding module in the periplasm, which might not induce a tight interaction between the membrane helices of the interaction partners (Fig. 6C).

DISCUSSION

It is generally accepted that cells in an Anabaena filament exchange regulators and metabolites. Two alternative routes have been considered: one utilizing the periplasm (2, 11) and another utilizing septal junction complexes (2, 14, 21, 22). While components for active transport through the periplasm, which might be required due to its gel-like texture (12), have not been described, the FraC, FraD, and SepJ proteins have been identified as putative components of the septal junction complexes (e.g., see references 14, 21, and 22). Based on functional analysis (i.e., transfer of fluorescent tracers and a fluorescent sucrose analog), these proteins may be part of two different types of complexes, one containing SepJ and another containing FraC and FraD (22, 40). However, only one type of septal junction has been noted structurally, with an outer diameter of about 15 to 20 nm (15–18) and an inner diameter of about 6 nm (7). For formation of the septal junctions, a channel has to span the 24-nm-thick septal PG layer (7). Recently, proteins of the AmiC family of amidases have been discussed to function in the formation of such channels or “nanopores” (23, 24).

We isolated Anabaena mutants of an alanine racemase (Alr2458) and of SjcF1 (All1861). Although mutant chromosomes could not be segregated, heterozygous mutants could be maintained and investigated, because Anabaena is known to be polyploid (41). In strain AFS-I-sjcF1, the sjcF1 gene dosage seems indeed to be too low to produce detectable levels of the protein SjcF1 (Fig. 5A to C). The low gene dosages led to alterations of the phenotypes of both strains (for instance, sensitivity to SDS), indicating that they bear an altered cell envelope. However, the alr2458 mutant is affected in PG synthesis and stability, as judged by (i) lower incorporation of vancomycin than in the wild type and (ii) sensitivity to proteinase K and lysozyme, which is not observed and not as drastic as for AFS-I-sjcF1, respectively (Fig. 3 and 4). Thus, the alanine racemase appears to be directly involved in PG synthesis, while SjcF1 is not.

SjcF1 was previously identified in cell wall preparations of both vegetative cells and heterocysts (25, 26). We observed a temporary downregulation of sjcF1 expression during early heterocyst formation induced by nitrogen depletion (Fig. 2) and an upregulation in response to enhanced metal levels (Fig. 2). Metals are known to bind to PG (30, 31) and thus, the observed metal regulation of expression might indicate a relationship of SjcF1 with general PG function. Additionally, it has been reported that sjcF1 is induced after 3 days of iron starvation with a subsequent decline after 7 days (42), which might suggest a restructuring of PG in response to oxidizing conditions.

The sjcF1 mutant specifically deviates in the size of septal junction channels. Consistent with a specific role of SjcF1, the alanine racemase mutation has only a small effect on channel formation (Fig. 5). Moreover, the intercellular transfer of calcein in the sjcF1 mutant (Fig. 6) is affected in a similar manner as in the sepJ mutant (14). This is consistent with the broad distribution of the septal junction channel diameter in the sjcF1 insertional mutant (Fig. 5), which might hint at a malfunction of the septal junction protein complex leading to reduced metabolite exchange. Thus, whereas the previously described AmiC proteins are amidases likely involved in channel formation (8, 23), SjcF1 function appears to be related to it, resulting in restriction of the diameter of the channel (Fig. 5).

Next to the studies on the sjcF1 mutant, the analysis of the protein function further supports a link between SjcF1 function and septal junction channel distribution. SjcF1 contains two functional PG-binding domains (Fig. 1) that most likely ensure anchoring of the protein to the PG. Consistently SjcF1 is localized to the cell walls and the intercellular septa (Fig. 5). However, SjcF1 does not contain a domain accounting for an enzymatic activity and thus is probably not involved in PG layer synthesis per se (Fig. 1 and 3), but it contains an SH3 domain for protein-protein interactions (Fig. 1) (27). Proteins with the same architecture as SjcF1 are only found in filamentous cyanobacteria (Fig. 1). In line with a relationship between septal junction channel function and SjcF1 activity, SjcF1 recognizes the SH3-binding motifs of FraC and SepJ and interacts with both proteins in a bacterial two-hybrid analysis (Fig. 6). Moreover, while being localized in the outer rim of the entire cell, SjcF1 is enriched in the intercellular septa (Fig. 5) where the septal proteins SepJ, FraC, and FraD are localized (19, 21, 22). In addition, fraC, fraD, and sepJ are upregulated in AFS-I-sjcF1, and expression of sjcF1 is significantly enhanced in a sepJ mutant and a mutant with mutation of all of these septal factors (Table 2). This is consistent with the observed alteration of the septal junction channel diameter in the sjcF1 insertional mutant (Fig. 5). However, perhaps because of the presence of septal junction channels, albeit with altered diameter, strain AFS-I-sjcF1 does not show a fragmentation phenotype (43), which is characteristic for the mutants of some proteins directly involved in septal junction complex formation (5, 19–21).

Considering the presented results, it can be suggested that SjcF1 interacts with FraC and SepJ to arrange the septal junction complexes in the PG layer. Thereby, SjcF1 would bridge the septal junction complexes to the PG layer. The absence of such a bridge apparently disturbs the refinement of channel dimension in the septal PG but not its existence. In turn, the disturbance of the channel dimension has a negative effect on the efficiency of molecular transfer through the septal junction complex as judged from the decreased rate of intercellular calcein transfer (Fig. 6). Thus, the identification of SjcF1 expands our understanding of septal junction formation. Possible components of the septal junction complexes themselves, namely, SepJ, FraC, and FraD, and at least two components securing that septal junction complexes traverse the septal PG layer, namely, an AmiC amidase and SjcF1, have now been identified. Whereas AmiC appears to be involved in the formation of perforations in the septal PG, SjcF1 influences their dimension and may bridge the septal junction complexes with the PG layer. Nonetheless, based on the localization of SjcF1 in the entire outer rim of the cell, FraC and SepJ might not be the only interaction partners of SjcF1. Consistently with this idea, 270 proteins predicted to be secreted out of the cytoplasm and bearing an SH3 target motif (PXXPX[RK] or [RKHYFW]XXPXXP) in a soluble domain are encoded in the Anabaena genome (see Table S6 in the supplemental material). Considering that our results strongly suggest that SjcF1 is not involved in PG synthesis, while the sjcF1 mutant is sensitive to SDS, SjcF1 might be required for connection of outer and inner membrane proteins to the PG layer for stabilization rather than for recruitment of PG-modifying enzymes to the PG. Nevertheless, possible functions of SjcF1 besides the regulation of septal junction complex formation need to be explored in the future.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bioinformatic approaches.

For the identification of bacterial proteins containing the Pfam (44) domains SH3_3 (PF08239) and PG_binding_1 (PF01471), regardless of the domain order, we searched in the nr database (45) using HMMER (46). These sequences were screened for additional Pfam domains using the PfamScan script (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

Recombinant protein expression.

To generate SjcF1 fused to an N-terminal His tag for recombinant protein expression, full-length sequence of sjcF1 (all1861) was obtained from Cyanobase (47), and TM domains were predicted as described in the supplemental material. The coding sequence of all1861 without transmembrane domain (bp 193 to 810 [see Table S5 in the supplemental material]) was amplified by PCR on genomic DNA of Anabaena using oligonucleotides containing BamHI and HindIII restriction sites (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The SjcF1ΔPG2 and SjcF1PG2 constructs for recombinant protein expression were produced by amplification of the coding sequence of the SH3 and PG binding domain 1 (bp 193 to 594) and the PG binding domain 2 (bp 601 to 810), respectively. Restricted PCR products were cloned into pQEA8 (Ampr) see Table S4 in the supplemental material) downstream of the 6× histidine tag coding region. Constructs were verified by sequencing (GATC Biotech AG, Constance, Germany). Proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21star/pRosetta/pRep4 (Kmr Cmr) in 2 liters LB medium for 3 h at 37°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (5,000 rpm, 4°C, 10 min), resuspended with a mixture of 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and lysed by passing through a French pressure cell at 20,000 lb/in2. After low-speed centrifugation to remove the cell debris, the supernatant was incubated with Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) resin (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), washed 4 times with a mixture of 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 40 mM imidazole, and eluted in the same buffer with 500 mM imidazole.

Peptidoglycan layer binding.

Isolation of PG from Anabaena and transmission electron microscopy were performed as described in reference 8, using trypsin instead of α-chymotrypsin. The in vitro PG binding assay was adapted from reference 48. In brief, 50 µg of purified protein was centrifuged for 15 min at 4°C and 300,000 × g. The pellet was collected for analysis. The supernatant was mixed with 50 µl isolated PG layer and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 4°C and 300,000 × g, the supernatant was collected for analysis, and the pellet was washed with 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8) and 500 mM NaCl. After centrifugation, the pellet and supernatant fractions were supplemented with Laemmli buffer up to uniform volume. To control for protein precipitation, the same procedure was done without addition of the PG layer. All samples were analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-His tag antibody (GE Healthcare, Munich, Germany). Transmission electron microscopy was performed using a Philips CM12 microscope.

Anabaena strain construction and growth.

Mutants were generated by previously described methods (49–52) using standard plasmids (49, 50, 53) (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). To generate mutant strain AFS-I-sjcF1, an internal fragment of sjcF1 was amplified by PCR on Anabaena genomic DNA using oligonucleotides containing BamHI restriction sites (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The restricted PCR product was cloned into pCSV3 (see Table S4). To generate GFP promoter fusion strain AFS-PDGF-sjcF1, 740 bp of the region upstream of sjcF1 including the first 30 bp of the coding region was amplified by PCR on Anabaena genomic DNA using oligonucleotides containing BstBI/EcoRV restriction sites. Restricted PCR products were further cloned into pCSEL21 upstream of the gfp open reading frame (ORF). Fusion fragments were excised by digestion with PstI/EcoRI and ligated into cargo vector pCSEL24 for homologous recombination (50). Conjugation into Anabaena was done as described previously (51, 54). The mutant strain AFS-I-P24 is a nucA-nuiA (all7361-all7362) single recombinant mutant of Anabaena generated by integration of plasmid pCSEL24 into the nucA-nuiA region (51, 54, 55).

To inactivate the alanine racemase gene, an internal 449-bp fragment of alr2458 was amplified by PCR using primers alr2458-1 and alr2458-2 (with BamHI restriction sites at the 5′ ends [461 bp]) and Anabaena genomic DNA. The amplified fragment was cloned into vector pMBL-T (Dominion MBL), producing pCSR82, and transferred as a BamHI-ended fragment to BamHI-digested pCSV3, producing pCSR90 (Smr Spr). Conjugation of Anabaena with E. coli HB101 carrying pCSR90 with helper and methylation plasmid pRL623 was effected by the conjugative plasmid pRL443, carried in E. coli ED8654, and performed with selection for resistance to Sm and Sp. The genomic structure of selected clones was studied by PCR on isolated DNA with the primer pair alr2458-3 and alr2458-4 yielding 1,051 bp (wild type) or ~5.5 kb (mutant). The insertion mutant, which was checked to contain the new genomic structure in alr2458, although it could not be segregated, was designated strain CSR27.

Growth of Anabaena strains (21, 22, 33, 51, 52) (Table 1) and preparation of plates were done as described previously (54). Cells were spotted on BG11 agar medium in the presence or absence of the indicated concentrations of antibiotics, lysozyme, SDS, and proteinase K. Physiological parameters were determined as described previously (56, 57). In brief, pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) analysis of chlorophyll a fluorescence of Anabaena strains using a mini-imaging PAM chlorophyll fluorimeter (Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) was performed as described previously (56). The effective PSII quantum yield, Ф(II), and the electron transport rate (ETR) were calculated as described previously (57). Lipid extraction and analysis were done as described previously (51).

DNA and RNA isolation and analysis.

RNA and DNA isolation, segregation analysis, RT-PCR, and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis were performed by standard procedures (58). The oligodeoxynucleotides used are listed in Table S3 in the supplemental material. Southern blotting was performed by standard procedures (59) using 32P-labeled DNA as a probe produced by PCR and radioactively labeled by use of Ready-to-Go DNA labeling beads from GE Healthcare (Munich, Germany). Genomic DNA was digested with HindIII.

Fluorescence analysis.

GFP fluorescence of AFS-PDGF-sjcF1 was visualized as described previously (51). The methods for preparation of the Van–FL stain and staining of Anabaena were adapted from reference 34. In brief, Anabaena cells were diluted to an optical density at 750 nm (OD750) of 0.6 and on the next day incubated with 2 µg/ml of Van-FL for 1 h in the dark. Before visualization, cells were washed two times with BG11 medium. For the negative control, cells were incubated with the same concentration of uncoupled vancomycin. Fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Leica SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope with an HCX PL APO CS 40¥ 1.25 NA oil objective. Van-FL was excited at 488 nm, and fluorescence was monitored in the range from 500 to 520 nm. Chlorophyll a autofluorescence was detected through a window from 630 to 700 nm.

Immunofluorescence analysis.

Immunofluorescence was performed as described previously (60). In brief, 1 ml of Anabaena culture in BG11 was pelleted and fixed in a mixture of 100 mM PIPES [piperazine-N,N′-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid)], 1 mM MgSO4, and 2 mM EGTA (pH 6.9) (MtSB buffer) containing 3.7% paraformaldehyde. After being washed twice with MtSB, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 15 min and 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) for 15 min. After being pelleted and resuspended in 100 µl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), cells were spotted on coverslips coated with poly-l-lysine. Coverslips were washed twice in PBS for 5 min and blocked using 0.1 M glycine in PBS for 15 min and 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 30 min. Coverslips were incubated with anti-SjcF1 peptide antibodies (PSL GmbH) in 1% BSA–PBS overnight at 4°C. After being washed twice in PBS, coverslips were incubated with secondary fluorochrome-labeled antiserum (rabbit anti-Cy3; Sigma-Aldrich) in 1% BSA–PBS for 1.5 h at room temperature. Fluorescence was recorded using the Leica SP5 (excitation at 561 nm; emission between 564 and 620 nm). Cyanobacterial autofluorescence was recorded between 640 and 750 nm.

FRAP analysis.

FRAP measurements and labeling of Anabaena with calcein-AM (Sigma-Aldrich) was performed as described previously (14). In brief, after incubation with calcein and washing with BG11, 5 µl cells was mixed with 50 µl BG11 medium containing 1% low-melting-temperature agar and spotted on an object slide. FRAP measurements were performed using the Leica SP5 with the program Leica Microsystems, Las AF, FRAP Wizard (excitation with argon laser [488 nm] with 15% power, emission at 500 to 527 nm with smart gain of 562 nm and pinhole of 95 µm, 63× oil-immersion objective, and zoom factor of 2.5). For bleaching, the “zoom in” approach was chosen, and the laser power increased to 23%. All other parameters were kept constant. The bleaching area was adjusted to the size of a single cell. The bleaching length and interval between single images were set to 1.2 s. Before bleaching, 2 images were taken, and recovery of the fluorescence signal was recorded for 40 s. The intensity of the fluorescence signal was quantified using ImageJ, and the data were processed with SigmaPlot 12.

Anisotropy measurements.

Two hundred micromoles of peptide was labeled with 2 µM N-(5-fluorescenyl)-maleimide (Sigma-Aldrich) in a mixture of 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.0), 150 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2. The protein concentration of His-tagged SjcF1 in elution buffer (50 mM HEPES [pH 6.8], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 500 mM imidazole) was determined by Bradford spectrometry. Anisotropy (excitation, 492 nm; emission, 522 nm) was measured by using Fluorolog and a Horiba Jobin Yvok spectrometer with a constant fluorophore concentration of 50 nM.

Bacterial two-hybrid analysis.

Constructs were prepared as described previously (39, 61). To construct a T18 or T25 fusion protein, all1861 was amplified using primers all1861-1 and all1861-2 (see Table S3 in the supplemental material). The amplified fragment was digested with BamHI and KpnI and cloned into the pKT25 vector, producing pCSFR56, which expresses the T25 fusion protein, or into pUT18C, producing pCSFR57, which expresses the T18 fusion protein (61). Construction of the fusions with the whole SepJ protein have been described previously (39) and with FraC and FraD will be described elsewhere (J. E. Frías and E. Flores, unpublished data). Plasmids were cotransformed into BTH101 (cya-99). Transformants were plated onto LB medium containing selective antibiotics and 1% glucose. Efficiencies of interactions between different hybrid proteins were quantified by measurement of β-galactosidase activity in cells from liquid cultures.

Bacteria were grown in LB medium in the presence of 0.5 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and appropriate antibiotics at 30°C for 16 h. Before the assays, cultures were diluted 1:5 into buffer Z (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4). To permeabilize cells, 30 µl of toluene and 35 µl of a 0.1% SDS solution were added to 2.5 ml of bacterial suspension. The tubes were vortexed for 10 s and incubated with agitation at 37°C for 45 min for evaporation of toluene. For the enzymatic reaction, 875 µl of permeabilized cells was added to buffer Z supplemented with β-mercaptoethanol (25 mM final concentration), to a final volume of 3.375 ml. The tubes were incubated at 30°C in a water bath for at least 5 min. The reaction was started by adding 875 µl of 0.4 mg·ml−1 o-nitrophenol-β-galactoside (ONPG) in buffer Z. One-milliliter samples taken at different times (up to 10 min) were added to 0.5 ml of 1 M Na2CO3 to stop the reaction. The A420 was recorded, and the amount of o-nitrophenol produced was calculated using an extinction coefficient of ε420 = 4.5 mM−1 cm−1 and referred to the amount of total protein, determined by a modified Lowry procedure. The o-nitrophenol produced per milligram of protein versus time was represented, and β-galactosidase activity was deduced from the slope of the linear function. The activity in Fig. 6E (signal intensity) corresponds to nanomoles of o-nitrophenol (per milligram of protein) per minute.

Transmembrane domain prediction.

Different prediction programs were used to define a consensus for the number of transmembrane helices (helical TM) for FraC (3 helical TM [see Table S5 in the supplemental material]), FraD (5 TM [see Table S5]), SjcF1 (1 TM [see Table S5]), and SepJ (9 TM [see Table S5]). The programs used are DAS (62), MEMSAT (63), TM-Pred (64), SOSUI (65), SPLIT (66), Minnou (67), TM-Finder (68), TopCon (69), PHDhtm (70), and TMHMM (71).

SjcF1 is essential for Anabaena sp. growth. (A) The gene cluster is shown as in Fig. 1A. The assigned Pfam domains for the individual encoded proteins are shown. The global classification of the proteins is shown on top with the following abbreviations: CPEPPM, carboxy phosphonoenolpyruvate phosphonomutase; NADH D, putative NADH dehydrogenase. The domain characterization for each gene is indicated. all1862 is characterized by the Pfam domain PF01551, peptidase M23 domain; all1863 is characterized by the superfamily domain SSF51621, phosphoenolpyruvate/pyruvate kinase domain; all1864 is characterized by the Pfam domain PF00881, nitroreductase; all1865 is characterized by the Pfam domain PF00724, NADH:flavin oxidoreductase/NADH oxidase family; all1866 is characterized by the Pfam domain PF00085, thioredoxin. (B) Scheme of AFS-I-sjcF1. White boxes are duplicated region used for recombination. (C) Southern blot analysis of genomic DNA isolated from Anabaena (WT) or three independent clones of AFS-I-sjcF1 digested with HindIII using a 32P-labeled sjcF1 probe. (D) PCR was performed on genomic DNA isolated from AFS-I-sjcF1 or wild-type cells using sjcF1-specific primers (lane 1), and the sjcF1 forward (lane 2) or reverse (lane 3) primer with Spr Smr-R primer. (E) Growth of the Anabaena wild-type and AFS-I-sjcF1 strains in BG11 medium. (F) Five microliters of three dilutions of cell suspensions of CSR10 as a control and AFS-I-sjcF1 were spotted on BG11, BG110, or BG11A (with ammonia instead of nitrate as nitrogen source) medium, and growth was inspected after 7 days. (G) Photosynthetic parameters were determined by PAM measurements, and the maximal quantum yield of photosystem II (left) and the electron transport rate (right) were determined for CSR10 (used as a control [52]) and AFS-I-sjcF1. (H) Lipid analysis of CSR10 or AFS-I-sjcF1 grown in BG110 medium. Download

Figure S1, PDF file, 0.3 MB

Controls of Van-FL staining. AFS-I-sjcF1 or Anabaena wild-type cells grown in BG11 medium were incubated with uncoupled vancomycin and analyzed by CLSM. The fluorescence of Van-FL (FL), the cyanobacterial autofluorescence (AUF), and the overlay (OL) are shown. This analysis serves as a control such that the fluorescence channel chosen is specific to activated vancomycin and does not detect the autofluorescence of Anabaena cells. Download

Figure S2, PDF file, 0.2 MB

Theoretical florescence recovery by random diffusion. Time-dependent recovery of calcein in a distance of 5 µm or 10 µm by free diffusion according to Fick’s second law: (for calculation, s was set to 100). Download

Figure S3, PDF file, 0.3 MB

Binding of the SepJ-SH3 binding motif to SjcF1. Fluorescent-labeled peptide representing the SH3 binding motif of SepJ (3, FVEPVLPVPI; K, 39 ± 9 µM) or the mutated motif of SepJ (2, PLTSEKSSEP; K, >2 mM [reproduced from Fig. 6]) was incubated with increasing concentrations of His-tagged SjcF1. The fluorescent anisotropy was analyzed. For representation, the initial value was subtracted, and the curve is normalized to the maximal expected value. The lines indicate the least square fit analysis to F = Fmax × [SjcF1]/(KD + [SjcF1]). Download

Figure S4, PDF file, 0.2 MB

List of proteins with an SH3_3 domain (PF08239) and a PG_binding_1 domain (PF01471) and their additional domains. The analysis revealed the existence of a protein with similar characteristics to SjcF1 in 12 organisms in addition to Anabaena, namely, in Anabaena sp. strain 90, Anabaena variabilis, Calothrix sp. strain PCC 7103, Coleofasciculus chthonoplastes, Geitlerinema sp. strain PCC 7407, Leptolyngbya sp. strain PCC 6406, Nostoc punctiforme, Nostoc sp. strain PCC 7524, Oscillatoriales cyanobacterium JSC-12, Prochlorothrix hollandica, Rivularia sp. strain PCC 7116, and Spirulina subsalsa. The different columns of the table give the gi number of the protein sequence identified and analyzed, the phylum, and the additional domains identified.

Table S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB

Statistical analysis of channel diameter distribution.

Table S2, PDF file, 0.02 MB

Oligonucleotides used in this study.

Table S3, PDF file, 0.02 MB

Plasmids used in this study.

Table S4, PDF file, 0.1 MB

Prediction of the transmembrane domains for FraC, FraD, SjcF1, and SepJ. The program used and the positions of the individual TM domains are given. Predictions with low significance are written in italics. For SepJ, an additional helix with low probability at amino acid residues (aa) 469 to 488 is indicated by “*,” and “**” indicates that only primary helices were considered. For TM5, only 4 out of 10 programs identified a TM region with certainty, while all other programs predicted no TM helix or a helix of low certainty. Thus, the polypeptide stretch from aa 565 to 595 was analyzed individually; Minnou did not identify a transmembrane region in this peptide, whereas TM-Finder, TMHMM and SPLIT showed a low-significance TM when the section was analyzed individually. Because of experimental evidence (i.e., results from a GFP-mut2 fusion [19] and BACTH analysis [Fig. 6] localize the C terminus in the cytoplasm, and interaction with FtsQ [39] and with the SH3 domain of SjcF1 [see Table S6 in the supplemental material] place the N-terminal part in the periplasm) and low reliability for prediction of TM5, we omitted this TM from our assignment. For FraD and FraC, a study with a GFP-mut2 fusion has suggested that the C terminus of FraC and the N terminus of FraD are cytoplasmic (21).

Table S5, PDF file, 0.03 MB

Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 proteins predicted to be secreted out of the cytoplasm and bearing SH3-binding motif(s). All proteins encoded by the genome of Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 (in total, 6,135) were analyzed by SecretomeP (J. D. Bendtsen, L. Kiemer, A. Fausbøll, and S. Brunak, BMC Microbiol 5:58, 2004). All proteins with a score above 0.5 indicative for possible secretion signal were analyzed for the presence of a PXXPX[RK] (column 2) or [RKHYFW]XXPXXP (column 3) motif. (The number of detected motifs is indicated.) Column 1 gives the gene ID and column for the putative functional classification.

Table S6, PDF file, 0.04 MB