Literature DB >> 26126776

A Bayesian approach to mitigation of publication bias.

Maime Guan1, Joachim Vandekerckhove2.   

Abstract

The reliability of published research findings in psychology has been a topic of rising concern. Publication bias, or treating positive findings differently from negative findings, is a contributing factor to this "crisis of confidence," in that it likely inflates the number of false-positive effects in the literature. We demonstrate a Bayesian model averaging approach that takes into account the possibility of publication bias and allows for a better estimate of true underlying effect size. Accounting for the possibility of bias leads to a more conservative interpretation of published studies as well as meta-analyses. We provide mathematical details of the method and examples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference and parameter estimation; Bayesian statistics; Math modeling and model selection; Meta-analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26126776     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0868-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Wishful seeing: more desired objects are seen as closer.

Authors:  Emily Balcetis; David Dunning
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-12-17

2.  An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Meta-analysis using effect size distributions of only statistically significant studies.

Authors:  Marcel A L M van Assen; Robbie C M van Aert; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2014-11-17

4.  Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

Review 5.  Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

6.  A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05.

Authors:  E J Masicampo; Daniel R Lalande
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Social science. Publication bias in the social sciences: unlocking the file drawer.

Authors:  Annie Franco; Neil Malhotra; Gabor Simonovits
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The same old New Look: Publication bias in a study of wishful seeing.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-03-22

9.  Why current publication practices may distort science.

Authors:  Neal S Young; John P A Ioannidis; Omar Al-Ubaydli
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more
  16 in total

1.  Bayesian data analysis for newcomers.

Authors:  John K Kruschke; Torrin M Liddell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Researchers' choice of the number and range of levels in experiments affects the resultant variance-accounted-for effect size.

Authors:  Kensuke Okada; Takahiro Hoshino
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

3.  Metastudies for robust tests of theory.

Authors:  Beth Baribault; Chris Donkin; Daniel R Little; Jennifer S Trueblood; Zita Oravecz; Don van Ravenzwaaij; Corey N White; Paul De Boeck; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bayesian inference for psychology, part IV: parameter estimation and Bayes factors.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Julia M Haaf; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  The 'paradox' of converging evidence.

Authors:  Clintin P Davis-Stober; Michel Regenwetter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  The Influence of Divine Rewards and Punishments on Religious Prosociality.

Authors:  James Saleam; Ahmed A Moustafa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-03

7.  A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology.

Authors:  Alexander Etz; Joachim Vandekerckhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Meta-analyses are no substitute for registered replications: a skeptical perspective on religious priming.

Authors:  Michiel van Elk; Dora Matzke; Quentin F Gronau; Maime Guan; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15

9.  Selection bias, vote counting, and money-priming effects: A comment on Rohrer, Pashler, and Harris (2015) and Vohs (2015).

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Tom E Hardwicke; David R Shanks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-05

10.  Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.

Authors:  Richard Kunert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.