Literature DB >> 26126633

Paradox effects of binge drinking on response inhibition processes depending on mental workload.

Ann-Kathrin Stock1, Lea Riegler1, Witold X Chmielewski1, Christian Beste2.   

Abstract

Binge drinking is an increasing problem in Western societies, but we are still only beginning to unravel the effects of binge drinking on a cognitive level. While common sense suggests that all cognitive functions are compromised during high-dose ethanol intoxication, several studies suggest that the effects might instead be rather specific. Moreover, some results suggest that the degrees of automaticity and complexity of cognitive operations during response control modulate effects of binge drinking. However, this has not been tested in detail. In the current study, we therefore parametrically modulate cognitive/"mental" workload during response inhibition and examine the effects of high-dose ethanol intoxication (~1.1 ‰) in n = 18 male participants. The results suggest that detrimental effects of high-dose ethanol intoxication strongly depend on the complexity of processes involved in response inhibition. The results revealed strong effects (η (2) = .495) and are in line with findings showing that even high doses of ethanol have very specific effects on a cognitive level. Opposed to common sense, more complex cognitive operations seem to be less affected by a high-dose ethanol intoxication. Complementing this, high-dose ethanol intoxication is increasingly detrimental for action control, as stronger automated response tendencies are in charge and need to be controlled. Binge-like ethanol intoxication may take a heavier toll on cognitive control processes than on automated responses/response tendencies. Therefore, ethanol effects are more pronounced in supposedly "easier" control conditions because those facilitate the formation of automated response tendencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; Binge drinking; Response inhibition; Working memory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26126633     DOI: 10.1007/s00204-015-1565-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  7 in total

1.  Barking up the Wrong Tree: Why and How We May Need to Revise Alcohol Addiction Therapy.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-29

2.  Effects of multisensory stimuli on inhibitory control in adolescent ADHD: It is the content of information that matters.

Authors:  Witold X Chmielewski; Angela Tiedt; Annet Bluschke; Gabriel Dippel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.881

3.  Alcohol Hangover Slightly Impairs Response Selection but not Response Inhibition.

Authors:  Antje Opitz; Jan Hubert; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  How low working memory demands and reduced anticipatory attentional gating contribute to impaired inhibition during acute alcohol intoxication.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Stock; Shijing Yu; Filippo Ghin; Christian Beste
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Alcohol intoxication, but not hangover, differentially impairs learning and automatization of complex motor response sequences.

Authors:  Antje Opitz; Filippo Ghin; Jan Hubert; Joris C Verster; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Alcohol Hangover Does Not Alter the Application of Model-Based and Model-Free Learning Strategies.

Authors:  Julia Berghäuser; Wiebke Bensmann; Nicolas Zink; Tanja Endrass; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Alcohol Hangover Increases Conflict Load via Faster Processing of Subliminal Information.

Authors:  Nicolas Zink; Wiebke Bensmann; Christian Beste; Ann-Kathrin Stock
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.