Ivo K Joore1, Derk L Arts1, Marjan J P Kruijer1, Eric P Moll van Charante1, Suzanne E Geerlings2, Jan M Prins2, Jan Eam van Bergen3. 1. Department of General Practice, Division of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of General Practice, Division of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands STI AIDS Netherlands (Soa Aids Nederland), Amsterdam, The Netherlands Epidemiology & Surveillance Unit, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent guidelines advocate accelerated provider-initiated HIV testing by general practitioners (GPs). We aimed to identify the number of patient consultations in six general practices in the South-East of Amsterdam, and the incidence of HIV indicator conditions reported in their medical files prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional search in an electronic general practice database. We used a case-control design to identify those conditions most associated with an HIV-positive status. RESULTS: We included 102 HIV cases diagnosed from 2002 to 2012, and matched them with 299 controls. In the year prior to HIV diagnosis, 61.8% of cases visited their GP at least once, compared with 38.8% of controls. In the 5 years prior to HIV diagnosis, 58.8% of HIV cases had exhibited an HIV indicator condition, compared with 7.4% of controls. The most common HIV-related conditions were syphilis and gonorrhoea. The most common HIV-related symptoms were weight loss, lymphadenopathy and peripheral neuropathy. During this period, average HIV prevalence among people aged 15-59 years increased from 0.4% to 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed many opportunities for HIV indicator condition-guided testing in primary care. As yet, however, HIV indicator conditions are not exploited as triggers for early HIV testing. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVES: Recent guidelines advocate accelerated provider-initiated HIV testing by general practitioners (GPs). We aimed to identify the number of patient consultations in six general practices in the South-East of Amsterdam, and the incidence of HIV indicator conditions reported in their medical files prior to diagnosis. METHODS: A cross-sectional search in an electronic general practice database. We used a case-control design to identify those conditions most associated with an HIV-positive status. RESULTS: We included 102 HIV cases diagnosed from 2002 to 2012, and matched them with 299 controls. In the year prior to HIV diagnosis, 61.8% of cases visited their GP at least once, compared with 38.8% of controls. In the 5 years prior to HIV diagnosis, 58.8% of HIV cases had exhibited an HIV indicator condition, compared with 7.4% of controls. The most common HIV-related conditions were syphilis and gonorrhoea. The most common HIV-related symptoms were weight loss, lymphadenopathy and peripheral neuropathy. During this period, average HIV prevalence among people aged 15-59 years increased from 0.4% to 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed many opportunities for HIV indicator condition-guided testing in primary care. As yet, however, HIV indicator conditions are not exploited as triggers for early HIV testing. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
GENERAL PRACTICE; HIV; PREVENTION; PRIMARY CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH
Authors: S J Bogers; S H Hulstein; M F Schim van der Loeff; G J de Bree; P Reiss; J E A M van Bergen; S E Geerlings Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-05-08
Authors: Ivo K Joore; Denise E Twisk; Ann M Vanrolleghem; Maria de Ridder; Suzanne E Geerlings; Jan E A M van Bergen; Ingrid V van den Broek Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Annabelle Gourlay; Teymur Noori; Anastasia Pharris; Maria Axelsson; Dominique Costagliola; Susan Cowan; Sara Croxford; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Julia Del Amo; Valerie Delpech; Asunción Díaz; Enrico Girardi; Barbara Gunsenheimer-Bartmeyer; Victoria Hernando; Sophie Jose; Gisela Leierer; Georgios Nikolopoulos; Niels Obel; Eline Op de Coul; Dimitra Paraskeva; Peter Reiss; Caroline Sabin; André Sasse; Daniela Schmid; Anders Sonnerborg; Alexander Spina; Barbara Suligoi; Virginie Supervie; Giota Touloumi; Dominique Van Beckhoven; Ard van Sighem; Georgia Vourli; Robert Zangerle; Kholoud Porter Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: E Lord; A J Stockdale; R Malek; C Rae; I Sperle; D Raben; A Freedman; D Churchill; J Lundgren; A K Sullivan Journal: HIV Med Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Saskia J Bogers; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Udi Davidovich; Anders Boyd; Marc van der Valk; Kees Brinkman; Godelieve J de Bree; Peter Reiss; Jan E A M van Bergen; Suzanne E Geerlings Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: I K Joore; D F M Reukers; G A Donker; A I van Sighem; E L M Op de Coul; J M Prins; S E Geerlings; R E Barth; J E A M van Bergen; I V van den Broek Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 2.692