Olugbenga T Okusanya1, Elizabeth M DeJesus1, Jack X Jiang1, Ryan P Judy1, Ollin G Venegas1, Charuhas G Deshpande2, Daniel F Heitjan3, Shuming Nie4, Philip S Low5, Sunil Singhal6. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa. 2. Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa. 3. Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa. 4. Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Chemistry, Emory University, Atlanta, Ga. 5. Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind. 6. Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: sunil.singhal@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 80,000 people undergo resection of a pulmonary tumor each year, and the only method to determine if the tumor is malignant is histologic analysis. We propose that a targeted molecular contrast agent could bind lung adenocarcinomas, which could be identified using real-time optical imaging at the time of surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients with a biopsy-proven lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Before surgery, patients were systemically administered 0.1 mg/kg of a fluorescent folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeted molecular contrast agent by intravenous infusion. During surgery, tumors were imaged in situ and ex vivo, after the lung parenchyma was dissected to directly expose the tumor to the imaging system. RESULTS: Tumors ranged from 0.3 to 7.5 cm (mean: 2.6 cm), and 46 of 50 (92%) lung adenocarcinomas were fluorescent. No false uptake occurred, and in 2 cases, intraoperative imaging revealed tumor metastases (3 mm and 6 mm) that were not recognized preoperatively. Four adenocarcinomas were not fluorescent, and immunohistochemistry showed that these adenocarcinomas did not express FRα. Tumor fluorescence was independent of nodule size, uptake of 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)fluoro-D-glucose, histology, and tumor differentiation. Molecular imaging could identify only 7 of the 50 adenocarcinomas in situ in the patient without bisection. The most important predictor of the success of molecular imaging in locating the tumor in situ was the distance of the nodule from the pleural surface. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative molecular imaging with a targeted contrast agent can identify lung adenocarcinomas, and this technology is currently useful in patients with subpleural tumors, irrespective of size. With further refinements, this tool may prove useful in locating adenocarcinomas that are deeper in the lung parenchyma, in lymph nodes, and at pleural and resection margins.
BACKGROUND: More than 80,000 people undergo resection of a pulmonary tumor each year, and the only method to determine if the tumor is malignant is histologic analysis. We propose that a targeted molecular contrast agent could bind lung adenocarcinomas, which could be identified using real-time optical imaging at the time of surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients with a biopsy-proven lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Before surgery, patients were systemically administered 0.1 mg/kg of a fluorescent folate receptor alpha (FRα)-targeted molecular contrast agent by intravenous infusion. During surgery, tumors were imaged in situ and ex vivo, after the lung parenchyma was dissected to directly expose the tumor to the imaging system. RESULTS:Tumors ranged from 0.3 to 7.5 cm (mean: 2.6 cm), and 46 of 50 (92%) lung adenocarcinomas were fluorescent. No false uptake occurred, and in 2 cases, intraoperative imaging revealed tumor metastases (3 mm and 6 mm) that were not recognized preoperatively. Four adenocarcinomas were not fluorescent, and immunohistochemistry showed that these adenocarcinomas did not express FRα. Tumor fluorescence was independent of nodule size, uptake of 2-deoxy-2-((18)F)fluoro-D-glucose, histology, and tumor differentiation. Molecular imaging could identify only 7 of the 50 adenocarcinomas in situ in the patient without bisection. The most important predictor of the success of molecular imaging in locating the tumor in situ was the distance of the nodule from the pleural surface. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative molecular imaging with a targeted contrast agent can identify lung adenocarcinomas, and this technology is currently useful in patients with subpleural tumors, irrespective of size. With further refinements, this tool may prove useful in locating adenocarcinomas that are deeper in the lung parenchyma, in lymph nodes, and at pleural and resection margins.
Authors: Brian Madajewski; Brendan F Judy; Anas Mouchli; Veena Kapoor; David Holt; May D Wang; Shuming Nie; Sunil Singhal Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-08-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gooitzen M van Dam; George Themelis; Lucia M A Crane; Niels J Harlaar; Rick G Pleijhuis; Wendy Kelder; Athanasios Sarantopoulos; Johannes S de Jong; Henriette J G Arts; Ate G J van der Zee; Joost Bart; Philip S Low; Vasilis Ntziachristos Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-09-18 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Nikki Parker; Mary Jo Turk; Elaine Westrick; Jeffrey D Lewis; Philip S Low; Christopher P Leamon Journal: Anal Biochem Date: 2005-03-15 Impact factor: 3.365
Authors: L T Mantovani; S Miotti; S Ménard; S Canevari; F Raspagliesi; C Bottini; F Bottero; M I Colnaghi Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1994 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Elamprakash N Savariar; Csilla N Felsen; Nadia Nashi; Tao Jiang; Lesley G Ellies; Paul Steinbach; Roger Y Tsien; Quyen T Nguyen Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-27 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Daniel J O'Shannessy; Gordon Yu; Robert Smale; Yao-Shi Fu; Sunil Singhal; Robert P Thiel; Elizabeth B Somers; Anil Vachani Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2012-04
Authors: Allison S Cohen; Renata Patek; Steven A Enkemann; Joseph O Johnson; Tingan Chen; Eric Toloza; Josef Vagner; David L Morse Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Jane J Keating; Jeffrey J Runge; Sunil Singhal; Sarah Nims; Ollin Venegas; Amy C Durham; Gary Swain; Shuming Nie; Philip S Low; David E Holt Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kiranya E Tipirneni; Jason M Warram; Lindsay S Moore; Andrew C Prince; Esther de Boer; Aditi H Jani; Irene L Wapnir; Joseph C Liao; Michael Bouvet; Nicole K Behnke; Mary T Hawn; George A Poultsides; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; William R Carroll; Kurt R Zinn; Eben Rosenthal Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Stephan Rogalla; Sebastiaan C M Joosten; Israt S Alam; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Ophir Vermesh Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Suman B Mondal; Christine M O'Brien; Kevin Bishop; Ryan C Fields; Julie A Margenthaler; Samuel Achilefu Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Jarrod D Predina; Andrew D Newton; Courtney Connolly; Ashley Dunbar; Michael Baldassari; Charuhas Deshpande; Edward Cantu; Jason Stadanlick; Sumith A Kularatne; Philip S Low; Sunil Singhal Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 11.454