Literature DB >> 26126162

Cap-assisted colonoscopy and detection of Adenomatous Polyps (CAP) study: a randomized trial.

Heiko Pohl1, Steve P Bensen2, Arifa Toor2, Stuart R Gordon2, L Campbell Levy2, Brian Berk2, Peter B Anderson2, Joseph C Anderson1, Richard I Rothstein2, Todd A MacKenzie3, Douglas J Robertson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: Cap-assisted colonoscopy has improved adenoma detection in some but not other studies. Most previous studies have been limited by small sample sizes and few participating endoscopists. The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether cap-assisted colonoscopy improves adenoma detection in a two-center, multi-endoscopist, randomized trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who presented for an elective colonoscopy were randomized to cap-assisted colonoscopy (4-mm cap) or standard colonoscopy performed by one of 10 experienced endoscopists. Primary outcome measures were mean number of adenomas per patient and adenoma detection rate (ADR). Secondary outcomes included procedural measures and endoscopist variation; a logistic regression model was employed to examine predictors of increased detection with cap use.
RESULTS: A total of 1113 patients (64 % male, mean age 62 years) were randomized to cap-assisted (n = 561) or standard (n = 552) colonoscopy. The mean number of adenomas detected per patient in the cap-assisted and standard groups was similar (0.89 vs. 0.82; P = 0.432), as was the ADR (42 % vs. 40 %; P = 0.452). Cap-assisted colonoscopy achieved a faster cecal intubation time (4.9 vs. 5.8 minutes; P < 0.001), a similar cecal intubation rate (99 % vs. 98 %; P = 0.326), and a higher terminal ileum intubation rate (93 % vs. 89 %; P < 0.028). Cap-assisted colonoscopy resulted in a 20 % increase in ADR for some endoscopists and in a 15 % decrease for others. Individual preference for the cap was an independent predictor of increased adenoma detection in adjusted analysis (P < 0.001), whereas baseline low adenoma detection was not.
CONCLUSION: Although the efficiency of cecal and terminal ileum intubation was slightly improved by cap-assisted colonoscopy, adenoma detection was not. Cap-assisted colonoscopy may be beneficial for selected endoscopists. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicalTrials.gov (NCT01935180). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26126162     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  22 in total

Review 1.  Can Technology Improve the Quality of Colonoscopy?

Authors:  Selvi Thirumurthi; William A Ross; Gottumukkala S Raju
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-07

Review 2.  Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

3.  Adenoma and Advanced Adenoma Detection Rates of Water Exchange, Endocuff, and Cap Colonoscopy: A Network Meta-Analysis with Pooled Data of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Paul P Shao; Aileen Bui; Tahmineh Romero; Hui Jia; Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  K E van Keulen; E Soons; P D Siersema
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09

5.  Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved.

Authors:  Cassandra D L Fritz; Zachary L Smith; Jeffrey Elsner; Thomas Hollander; Dayna Early; Vladimir Kushnir
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Polyp Resection and Removal Procedures: Insights From the 2017 Digestive Disease Week.

Authors:  Carol Burke; Vivek Kaul; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-09

Review 7.  Flexible Gastro-intestinal Endoscopy - Clinical Challenges and Technical Achievements.

Authors:  Niehls Kurniawan; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  Impact of Full Spectrum Endoscopy® (Fuse®, EndoChoice®) on adenoma detection: a prospective French pilot study.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Ratone; Erwan Bories; Fabrice Caillol; Christian Pesenti; Sébastien Godat; Floriane Sellier; Solene Hoibian; Marine Landon; Cécilia Servajean; Chiara De Cassan; Valentin Lestelle; Jean-Patrick Casanova; Flora Poizat; Marc Giovannini
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-05

Review 9.  Recent advances in colonoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas J W Lee; Shelley Nair; Iosif Beintaris; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-03-11

Review 10.  Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Wee Sing Ngu; Colin Rees
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.