Colonoscopy with robotic steering and automated lumen centralization: a feasibility study in a colon model.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: We introduced a new platform for performing colonoscopy with robotic steering and automated lumen centralization (RS-ALC) and evaluated its technical feasibility. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Expert endoscopists (n = 8) and endoscopy-naive novices (n = 10) used conventional steering and RS-ALC to perform colonoscopy in a validated colon model with simulated polyps (n = 21). The participants were randomized to which modality they were to use first. End points were the cecal intubation time, number of detected polyps, and subjective evaluation of the platform.
RESULTS: Novices were able to intubate the cecum faster with RS-ALC (median 8 minutes [min] 56 seconds [s], interquartile range [IQR] 6  min 46  s - 16  min 34  s vs. median 11  min 47  s, IQR 8  min 19  s - 15  min 33  s, P = 0.65), whereas experts were faster with conventional steering (median 2  min 9  s, IQR 1  min 13 s - 7  min 28  s vs. median 13  min 1  s, IQR 5  min 9 s - 16  min 54  s, P = 0.12). Novices detected more polyps with RS-ALC (median 88.1 %, IQR 79.8 % - 95.2 % vs. median 78.6 %, IQR 75.0 % - 91.7 %, P = 0.17), whereas experts detected more polyps with conventional steering (median 80.9 %, IQR 76.2 % - 85.7 % vs. median 69.0 %, IQR 61.0 % - 75.0 %, P = 0.03). Novices were more positive than experts about the new platform (P = 0.02), noting an easier and faster introduction of the colonoscope with RS-ALC than with conventional steering.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy with RS-ALC is technically feasible and appears to be easier and more intuitive than conventional steering for endoscopy-naive novices. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes