| Literature DB >> 26125445 |
H Kasashima1, M Yashiro2, H Nakamae3, G Masuda1, H Kinoshita1, T Morisaki1, T Fukuoka1, T Hasegawa1, K Sakurai1, T Toyokawa1, N Kubo1, H Tanaka1, K Muguruma1, M Ohira1, T Nakane3, M Hino3, K Hirakawa1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify the role of bone marrow-derived stromal cells (BM-SCs) expressing CD271 in the development of gastric cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26125445 PMCID: PMC4522640 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Bone marrow-derived cells. (A) Bone marrow-derived cells infiltrated the stroma of gastric tumours. Green fluorescent protein-positive bone marrow-derived cells were found in far greater numbers in the stroma of gastric tumours compared with that in normal gastric mucosa. (B) CD271 expression in BM-SCs s. Approximately 25% of BM-MSCs were positive for CD271 expression. (C) Examination of the proportion of infiltrated bone marrow-derived cells in whole tumour suspension. CD271-positive cells were correlated with F4/80-positive cells but not with CD11b-positive cells. (D) Immunofluorescence staining of tumour stroma. GFP and F4/80 double positive cells were found in the tumour. (E and F) Immunohistochemical analysis of the stroma of orthotopic tumour. A number of GFP-positive BM-SCs s were positive for CD271, α-SMA, and F4/80 but not for CD11b. A full colour version of this figure is available at the BJC journal online.
Figure 2Relationship between BM-SCs and gastric cancer cell proliferation. Conditioned medium (CM) from BM-SCs significantly increased the proliferation of all gastric cancer cell lines compared with the control (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)). Conditioned medium from all gastric cancer cell lines significantly increased the number of BM-SCs s compared with the control (DMEM).
Figure 3Effect of BM-SCs on the motility of gastric cancer cells. (A) Representative images of cell density in a wound-healing assay. The number of OCUM-12 and NUGC-3 cells migrating across the wound was increased by CM from BM-SCs compared with the control (the absence of CM from BM-SCs). Images show the initial wound mask at 0 h (yellow) and at 24 h (blue). Relative wound confluence (%) was calculated as 100 × wound closure area at each time-point (blue)/wound area at time 0 (yellow). (B) Effect of BM-SCs on the migration of cancer cells. Conditioned medium from BM-SCs significantly stimulated migration (round and square line) (P<0.01). (C) Representative images of invading OCUM-12 and NUGC3 cells. The number of cells invading the pore membrane filter was increased by CM from BM-SCs compared with the control. (D) Effect of BM-SCs on the invasion of cancer cells. Conditioned medium from BM-SCs significantly stimulated invasion (P<0.001). Data are presented as the mean and s.d. (error bars) of at least four experiments. A full colour version of this figure is available at the BJC journal online.
Figure 4Expression of CD271 and survival of patients with gastric cancer. (A) CD271 was expressed on the membrane of fibroblasts in gastric cancer stroma. (B) Overall survival of all patients (n=279) based on CD271 expression in stromal cells. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve indicates that the overall survival of patients with CD271-positive expression in stromal cells was significantly worse compared with that of patients with CD271-negative expression (P=0.025). (C) Immunohistochemical analysis of CD271, Ki-67, and CD31. Ki-67 was expressed in the nucleus of cancer cells and CD271 and CD31 was mainly expressed on the membrane of stromal cells. (D) Ki-67 index of CD271-positive patients was significantly higher compared with that of CD271-negative patients (P<0.001). (E) The length of CD31-positive cells in the stroma of CD271-positive patients were significantly greater compared with that of CD271-negative patients (P<0.001).
Correlation between CD271 expression and clinicopathological features in 279 patients with gastric carcinoma
| <60 | 49 (78%) | 27 (22%) | |
| ⩾60 | 110 (52%) | 93 (48%) | 0.136 |
| Female | 100 (62%) | 62 (38%) | |
| Male | 59 (50%) | 58 (50%) | 0.067 |
| Other type | 133 (53%) | 118 (47%) | |
| Type-4 | 26 (93%) | 2 (7%) | <0.001 |
| Intestinal type | 57 (46%) | 68 (54%) | |
| Diffuse type | 102 (66%) | 52 (34%) | 0.001 |
| T1, T2 | 82 (51%) | 78 (49%) | |
| T3, T4 | 77 (65%) | 42 (35%) | 0.028 |
| Negative | 85 (55%) | 69 (45%) | |
| Positive | 74 (59%) | 51 (41%) | 0.544 |
| Negative | 67 (57%) | 51 (43%) | |
| Positive | 92 (57%) | 69 (43%) | 1.000 |
| Negative | 126 (58%) | 93 (42%) | |
| Positive | 33 (55%) | 27 (45%) | 0.769 |
| a, b | 93 (49%) | 97 (51%) | |
| c | 58 (79%) | 15 (21%) | <0.001 |
| Negative | 154 (57%) | 116 (43%) | |
| Positive | 5 (56%) | 4 (44%) | 1.000 |
| Negative | 146 (56%) | 116 (44%) | |
| Positive | 13 (76%) | 4 (24%) | 0.129 |
| Negative | 129 (56%) | 101 (44%) | |
| Positive | 18 (69%) | 8 (31%) | 0.217 |
Univariate and multivariate Cox multiple regression analysis with respect to overall survival after surgery in 279 patients with gastric carcinoma
| Positive | 1.818 | 1.079–3.065 | 0.025 | 1.414 | 0.762–2.622 | 0.272 |
| Type-4 | 5.866 | 3.496–9.842 | <0.001 | 1.217 | 0.628–0.362 | 0.561 |
| Diffuse type | 1.988 | 1.204–3.284 | 0.007 | 1.368 | 0.727–2.573 | 0.331 |
| T2–T4 | 19.815 | 7.220–54.380 | <0.001 | 6.833 | 1.922–24.290 | 0.003 |
| Positive | 11.152 | 5.701–21.815 | <0.001 | 4.175 | 1.779–9.798 | 0.001 |
| Positive | 8.150 | 3.902–17.019 | <0.001 | 0.875 | 0.349–2.196 | 0.777 |
| Positive | 3.811 | 2.373–6.122 | <0.001 | 1.449 | 0.828–2.535 | 0.194 |
| Positive | 1.836 | 1.132–2.976 | 0.014 | 0.680 | 0.351–1.316 | 0.252 |
| Positive | 5.906 | 2.679–13.023 | <0.001 | 2.448 | 0.986–6.077 | 0.054 |
| Positive | 10.593 | 5.725–19.600 | <0.001 | 1.733 | 0.755–3.974 | 0.194 |
| Positive | 11.030 | 6.213–19.580 | <0.001 | 3.544 | 1.653–7.595 | 0.001 |
Abbreviation: CI=confidence interval.