BACKGROUND: Objective monitoring of the severity of inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an essential part of disease management. However, repeat endoscopy to define extent and severity of inflammation is not practical. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a biomarker that can be used as a surrogate test to distinguish inflammatory from noninflammatory gastrointestinal disease. METHODS: A targeted search of the literature regarding FC, focusing primarily on the past three years, was conducted to develop practical clinical guidance on the current utility of FC in the routine management of IBD patients. RESULTS: It is recommended that samples for FC testing be obtained from the first bowel excretion of the day. FC testing should be used as standard of care to accurately confirm inflammation and 'real-time' disease activity when a clinician suspects an IBD flare. Although FC is a reliable marker of inflammation, its role in routine monitoring in improving long-term outcomes has not yet been fully assessed. Based on available evidence, the authors suggest the following cut-off values and management strategies: when FC levels are <50 µg⁄g to 100 µg⁄g, quiescent disease is likely and therapy should be continued; when FC levels are >100 µg⁄g to 250 µg⁄g, inflammation is possible and further testing (eg, colonoscopy) is required to confirm inflammation; and when FC levels are >250 µg⁄g, active inflammation is likely and strategies to control inflammation should be initiated (eg, optimizing current therapies or switching to an alternative therapy). DISCUSSION: FC is a useful biomarker to accurately assess the degree of inflammation and should be incorporated into the management of patients with IBD.
BACKGROUND: Objective monitoring of the severity of inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an essential part of disease management. However, repeat endoscopy to define extent and severity of inflammation is not practical. Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a biomarker that can be used as a surrogate test to distinguish inflammatory from noninflammatory gastrointestinal disease. METHODS: A targeted search of the literature regarding FC, focusing primarily on the past three years, was conducted to develop practical clinical guidance on the current utility of FC in the routine management of IBDpatients. RESULTS: It is recommended that samples for FC testing be obtained from the first bowel excretion of the day. FC testing should be used as standard of care to accurately confirm inflammation and 'real-time' disease activity when a clinician suspects an IBD flare. Although FC is a reliable marker of inflammation, its role in routine monitoring in improving long-term outcomes has not yet been fully assessed. Based on available evidence, the authors suggest the following cut-off values and management strategies: when FC levels are <50 µg⁄g to 100 µg⁄g, quiescent disease is likely and therapy should be continued; when FC levels are >100 µg⁄g to 250 µg⁄g, inflammation is possible and further testing (eg, colonoscopy) is required to confirm inflammation; and when FC levels are >250 µg⁄g, active inflammation is likely and strategies to control inflammation should be initiated (eg, optimizing current therapies or switching to an alternative therapy). DISCUSSION: FC is a useful biomarker to accurately assess the degree of inflammation and should be incorporated into the management of patients with IBD.
Authors: Michael Wagner; Christer G B Peterson; Peter Ridefelt; Per Sangfelt; Marie Carlson Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-09-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jeremy A Tibble; Gudmundur Sigthorsson; Russell Foster; Ian Forgacs; Ingvar Bjarnason Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F Costa; M G Mumolo; M Bellini; M R Romano; L Ceccarelli; P Arpe; C Sterpi; S Marchi; G Maltinti Journal: Dig Liver Dis Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.088
Authors: G T Ho; H M Lee; G Brydon; T Ting; N Hare; H Drummond; A G Shand; D C Bartolo; R G Wilson; M G Dunlop; I D Arnott; J Satsangi Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-02-17 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Alain M Schoepfer; Christoph Beglinger; Alex Straumann; Michael Trummler; Pietro Renzulli; Frank Seibold Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Rhiannon M J Snipe; Anthony Khoo; Cecilia M Kitic; Peter R Gibson; Ricardo J S Costa Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-12-12 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Peter C Ambe; Daniel Gödde; Lars Bönicke; Marios Papadakis; Stephan Störkel; Hubert Zirngibl Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Greg Rosenfeld; Astrid-Jane Greenup; Andrew Round; Oliver Takach; Lawrence Halparin; Abid Saadeddin; Jin Kee Ho; Terry Lee; Robert Enns; Brian Bressler Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Robert A Mitchell; Constantin Shuster; Neal Shahidi; Cherry Galorport; Mari L DeMarco; Gregory Rosenfeld; Robert A Enns; Brian Bressler Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-11-10