| Literature DB >> 26124962 |
Qinxiang Zheng1, Yueping Ren1, Radouil Tzekov2, Shanshan Hua1, Minghan Li1, Jijing Pang1, Jia Qu1, Wensheng Li3.
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate the iTRAQ-based proteomic changes of visual cycle-associated proteins in RPE of rd12 mice before and after RPE65 gene delivery. Mehtods. The right eyes of rd12 mice underwent RPE65 gene delivery by subretinal injection at P14, leaving the left eyes as control. C57BL/6J mice were served as a wide-type control group. ERGs were recorded at P42, and RPE-choroid-sclera complex was collected to evaluate the proteomic changes in visual cycle-associated proteins by iTRAQ-based analysis. Western blot was used to confirm the changes in the differentially expressed proteins of interest. Results. ERG parameters improved dramatically at P42 after RPE65 delivery. The proteomics analysis identified a total 536 proteins with a global false discovery rate of 0.21%, out of which 7 were visual cycle-associated proteins. RALBP-1, RBP-1, and IRBP were reduced in the untreated rd12 eyes and the former two were improved after gene therapy, confirmed by Western blot analysis. Conclusions. RPE65 gene delivery restored retinal function at P42 and modified the expression of other functional proteins implicated in the visual cycle. The level of RALBP-1 was still below the normal level after gene therapy in rd12 mice, which may explain the delayed dark adaption in LCA patients undergoing similar therapy.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26124962 PMCID: PMC4466473 DOI: 10.1155/2015/918473
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Figure 1ERG records of untreated rd12, treated rd12, and normal control C57BL/6J eyes. (a) Scotopic ERG of the 3 groups at P42; (b) photopic ERG at P42. (c) and (d) represent statistical comparison of a-wave and b-wave amplitudes among the different groups at P42 under scotopic and photopic conditions. The untreated rd12 eyes showed extremely low a-wave and b-wave response in both scotopic and photopic ERGs. The treated rd12 eyes had great improvement in both a-wave and b-wave amplitudes with normal peak time, close to the wide-type control levels. NS: no significance. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.001.
The identification and quantification of the visual cycle-associated proteins.
| Unused ProtScore | %Cov | Protein name | Peptides (95%) | Untreated | Treated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.74 | 47 | Retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 | 2 | 0.1159 | 0.6607 |
| 8.77 | 68.5 | Retinol-binding protein 1 | 5 | 0.6792 | 1.4997 |
| 11.16 | 34.8 | Interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein | 5 | 0.6368 | 0.5297 |
| 2 | 22.4 | Retinal dehydrogenase 2 | 1 | 0.9727 | 1.1066 |
| 41.2 | 22.4 | Retinal dehydrogenase 5 | 1 | 1.0864 | 1.0186 |
| 2 | 63.6 | Lecithin retinol acyltransferase | 1 | 0.912 | 0.9285 |
| 8.09 | 36.9 | Ezrin-radixin-moesin-binding phosphoprotein 50 | 4 | 0.9638 | 0.912 |
Figure 2Identification and quantification of differentially expressed proteins by iTRAQ. The RALBP-1, RBP-1, and IRBP were identified as differentially expressed visual cycle-associated proteins among the untreated rd12, treated rd12, and normal control C57BL/6J eyes. RALBP-1, RBP-1, and IRBP were remarkably reduced in the untreated rd12 mice (<0.7×) compared to those of C57BL/6J sample. In the treated rd12 eyes, RALBP-1 was increased to 6-fold of the untreated rd12 level, although it was still lower than the normal level (0.66-fold); RBP-1 was increased to 2-fold of the untreated rd12 level and 1.50-fold of the normal level. IRBP level was still lower in the treated rd12 eyes.
Figure 3Western blot analysis of differentially expressed proteins. (a) The expression of RALBP-1 and RBP-1 was weak in the untreated rd12 eyes and appeared to increase significantly following gene therapy to levels similar to those present in normal wild-type control eyes. (b) and (c) show the relative grayscale of RALBP-1 and RBP-1 compared to the wild-type values.