| Literature DB >> 26124867 |
Olivier Jeannin1, Frédéric Barrière1, Marc Fourmigué1.
Abstract
A series of tetrathiafulvalenes funEntities:
Keywords: electrochemistry; electron withdrawing group (EWG); fluorine; tetrathiafulvalene (TTF)
Year: 2015 PMID: 26124867 PMCID: PMC4464086 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.11.73
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Scheme 1Mesomeric forms of 1,3-dithiole rings substituted with EWG.
Scheme 2Investigated TTF derivatives bearing EWG.
Scheme 3Synthetic procedures to the CF3-substituted 4bc, 1c and 2ac molecules.
Scheme 4Synthetic procedure to 3bc.
Electrochemical and spectroscopic data of the EDT-TTF-RR′ derivatives 1 and 2. Reported values with other electrochemical references were converted to approximate values vs SCE and are given in italics. Potentials reported vs Fc+/Fc were converted to SCE by adding 0.39 V. Potentials reported vs Ag/AgCl were converted to SCE by adding −0.045 V. Lowest energy absorption maximum λmax (nm) and molar extinction coefficient ε (L·mol−1·cm−1) are determined in CH2Cl2 unless otherwise specified).
| RR′ | solvent | reference electrode | references (electrochemistry) | Σσmeta | λmax (ε) | references (UV–vis) | ||
| H, H | CH3CN | SCE | 0.42 | 0.74 | [ | 0.28 | 441 (451) | this work |
| H, CO2Me ( | CH3CN | SCE | [ | 0.63 | 480 | [ | ||
| H, CF3 ( | CH2Cl2 | SCE | [ | 0.74 | 374 (2200) | this work | ||
| H, CN ( | PhCN | SCE | 0.65 | 1.0 | [ | 0.90 | 422 (725) | this work |
| CO2Me, CO2Me ( | CH3CN | SCE | [ | 0.98 | 443 (1310) | this work | ||
| CF3, CO2Me ( | CH2Cl2 | SCE | [ | 1.09 | 467 (10800) | this work | ||
| CF3, CF3 ( | CH2Cl2 | SCE | [ | 1.2 | 422 (990) | this work | ||
| CN, CF3 ( | CH2Cl2 | SCE | this work | 1.36 | 464 (760) | this work | ||
| CN, CN ( | — | — | — | 1.52 | 500 (464) | [ | ||
Electrochemical and spectroscopic data of tetrasubstituted TTF derivatives. E1/2 values are reported in V vs SCE reference electrode. Lowest energy absorption maximum λmax (nm) and molar extinction coefficient ε (L·mol−1·cm−1) are determined in CH2Cl2 unless otherwise specified).
| solvent | references (electrochemistry) | Σσmeta | λmax (ε) | references (UV–vis) | |||
| TTF | CH3CN | 0.33 | 0.71 | [ | 0 | 446 (263)a | [ |
| TTF(CO2Me)4 ( | CH3CN | 0.83 | 1.10 | [ | 1.4 | 445 (1930) | [ |
| CH2Cl2 | 0.95 | 1.28 | this work | 1.62 | 437 (2430) | this work | |
| CH2Cl2 | 0.90 | 1.23 | this work | 1.62 | 467 (2280) | this work | |
| TFF(CF3)4 ( | CH3CN | 1.05 | 1.28 | [ | 1.84 | 416 (1390) | this work |
| TTF(CN)4 ( | CH3CN | 1.12 | 1.22 | [ | 2.48 | 502 (2000) | [ |
aIn CH3CN.
Figure 1Correlation between the first oxidation potential E1/2 and the sum of the Hammet σmeta parameters. TTF that only contain only CF3 EWG are given in red.
Figure 2Calculated frontier orbitals of geometry-optimized [B3LYP/6-31G(d)] model compounds TTF, TTF-CF3, TTF-CO2Me and TTF-CN, with the lowest energy optical transitions deduced from TD-DFT calculations (see Table 3).
Calculated (TD-DFT, B3LYP/6-311G**) optical transitions in the model compounds TTF, TTF–CF3, TTF–CO2Me and TTF–CN, and comparison with the experimentally determined values in the analogous EDT-TTF derivatives.
| model | transition | oscillator strength | λcalc (nm) | compound | λobs (nm) |
| TTF | HOMO→LUMO | 0.0000 | 458.14 | EDT-TTF | 441 (451) |
| HOMO→LUMO + 1a | 0.0179 | 361.54 | 374 (1266, sh) | ||
| TTF–CF3 | HOMO→LUMO | 0.0009 | 448.62 | — | |
| HOMO→LUMO + 1a | 0.0203 | 387.41 | 374 (2200) | ||
| TTF–CO2Me | HOMO→LUMO | 0.0390 | 471.16 | 480, see [ | |
| HOMO→LUMO + 1 | 0.0001 | 450.83 | 418, see [ | ||
| TTF–CN | HOMO→LUMO | 0.0018 | 458.46 | 422 (725) | |
| HOMO→LUMO | 0.0263 | 452.63 | |||
| HOMO→LUMO + 2a | 0.0000 | 333.71 | – | ||
aThe HOMO→LUMO + 4 is also involved in this transition. Cf Supporting Information File 1 for complete TD-DFT calculations.
Figure 3View of the 2ac molecule. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
Figure 4View of the 2bc molecule. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
Evolution of bonds distances within the dithiole ring in EDT-TTF derivatives substituted with one or two EWG. Definition of the C–S b and b′ bond distances are given in the scheme below.
| compound | 100( | references | ||
| CN, CF3 ( | 1.745(5) | 1.731(9) | −0.8% | this work |
| CO2Me, CF3 ( | 1.727(23) | 1.715(33) | −0.7% | this work |
| 1.744(4) | 1.734(4) | –0.6% | this work | |
| H, CN ( | 1.760(7) | 1.751(6) | −0.5% | [ |
| H, CF3 ( | 1.765(2) | 1.737(2) | −1.6% | [ |
Figure 5View of the two crystallographically independent 4bc molecules. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level.
Figure 6View of the 3bc molecule. Note the disordered CF3 groups as well as the CO2Me group orthogonal to the TTF plane.
Figure 7A view of the alternated stacks along the b axis in (1c)2(TCNQ).
Structural characteristics of the C2S4 central core in EDT-TTF-CF3 (1c) derivatives. ρ is the charge of 1c in the different combinations. Bonds a (C=C) and b, b′, c, c′ (Ccentral−S) are identified in the scheme below.
| ρ | references | ||||||
| 0 | 1.348(3) | 1.755(2) | 1.758(2) | 1.759(2) | 1.759(2) | [ | |
| ( | ≈0 | 1.336(4) | 1.756(15) | 1.763(6) | 1.756(6) | 1.755(15) | this work |
| ( | ≈1 | 1.382(6) | 1.727(4) | 1.733(4) | 1.723(4) | 1.708(4) | this work |
Figure 8Detail of the overlap between donor and acceptor molecules in (1c)2(TCNQ).
Figure 9Projection view along the a axis of the unit cell of (1c+•)(FeCl4−).
Crystallographic data.
| compound | ( | ( | ||||
| formula | C10H4F3NS6 | C11H7F3O3S6 | C12H6F6O4S4 | C12H6F6O4S4 | C15H7F3N2S6 | C9H5Cl4F3FeS6 |
| fw | 387.50 | 420.53 | 456.41 | 456.41 | 464.59 | 560.14 |
| cryst syst | monoclinic | triclinic | monoclinic | orthorhombic | monoclinic | orthorhombic |
| space group | ||||||
| 5.0849(5) | 5.1515(12) | 7.4209(8) | 28.000(3) | 13.2146(15) | 5.9348(5) | |
| 10.9285(12) | 11.998(2) | 17.0659(17) | 8.7129(9) | 11.1448(8) | 14.4165(15) | |
| 12.7619(13) | 12.974(3) | 13.5707(15) | 7.2091(7) | 13.1662(15) | 21.785(2) | |
| α/deg | 90 | 103.96(3) | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
| β/deg | 97.741(12) | 90.02(3) | 97.834(13) | 90 | 106.997(13) | 90 |
| γ/deg | 90 | 90.45(3) | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
| 702.72(13) | 778.2(3) | 1702.6(3) | 1758.8(3) | 1854.3(3) | 1863.9(3) | |
| 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| 1.831 | 1.795 | 1.781 | 1.724 | 1.664 | 1.996 | |
| diffractometer | Stoe-IPDS | Stoe-IPDS | Stoe-IPDS | Stoe-IPDS | Stoe-IPDS | KappaCCD |
| temp/K | 293(2) | 293(2) | 293(2) | 293(2) | 293(2) | 150(2) |
| μ/mm−1 | 0.991 | 0.910 | 0.636 | 0.616 | 0.768 | 2.072 |
| θ-range/deg | 2.45–25.75 | 1.75−25.94 | 1.85–25.85 | 2.45−25.98 | 2.44−25.83 | 2.34−26.02 |
| measured refls | 6805 | 7498 | 12937 | 10664 | 13683 | 38263 |
| indep. refls | 2682 | 2778 | 3263 | 1861 | 3518 | 3675 |
| 0.0334 | 0.126 | 0.0639 | 0.0815 | 0.065 | 0.109 | |
| I > 2σ(I) refls | 1986 | 989 | 2161 | 833 | 2190 | 2932 |
| abs. corr. | multi-scan | none | gaussian | multi-scan | multi-scan | multi-scan |
| 0.786, 0.851 | — | 0.782, 0.901 | 0.937, 0.927 | 0.912, 0.822 | 0.769,0.733 | |
| refined params | 199 | 199 | 289 | 151 | 236 | 228 |
| 0.0327 | 0.0442 | 0.0320 | 0.0342 | 0.0339 | 0.0410 | |
| 0.0765 | 0.0909 | 0.0783 | 0.0654 | 0.0814 | 0.0538 | |
| res. Δρ (e Å−3) | +0.297, −0.357 | +0.29, −0.28 | 0.211, −0.166 | +0.18, −0.16 | +0.32, −0.20 | +0.41, −0.42 |