Literature DB >> 26124161

Nephrotoxicity comparison of two commercially available generic vancomycin products.

Jesse D Sutton1, Ryan P Mynatt2, Keith S Kaye3, Kyle P Murray4, Michael J Rybak5, Jason M Pogue6.   

Abstract

To date, no comparative clinical studies have investigated the effects of different vancomycin products on nephrotoxicity. The objective of this single-center, retrospective, matched-cohort study was to investigate the impact of two different vancomycin products on the development of nephrotoxicity. The study population included adults receiving a single vancomycin product, from either Pfizer or Hospira, for their entire course of therapy. Patients were matched based on underlying nephrotoxicity risk factors. Secondary outcomes included the need for renal replacement therapy, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality. One-hundred forty-six matched pairs (n = 292) were included, and they had no significant differences in demographics, comorbid conditions, severity of illness, or vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity risk factors. The frequency of nephrotoxicity was 8.9% in the Pfizer group and 11.0% in the Hospira group as defined by the 2009 consensus vancomycin guidelines (P = 0.56), 17.1% in the Pfizer group and 13.0% in the Hospira group as defined by the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) (P = 0.33), and 10.3% in the Pfizer group and 11.6% in the Hospira group as defined by RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage renal disease) criteria (P = 0.71). There were no differences between groups in regard to nephrotoxicity by any definition or in secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis of overall nephrotoxicity risk factors, the type of vancomycin product was not independently associated with increased odds of developing nephrotoxicity according to the RIFLE criteria. Based on our results, there are no discernible differences between Pfizer and Hospira vancomycin products in the frequency of nephrotoxicity. Confirmation of these results with other types of vancomycin and different patient populations is warranted.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26124161      PMCID: PMC4538541          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00388-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  20 in total

Review 1.  Implications of vancomycin degradation products on therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  A L Somerville; D H Wright; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

Review 3.  Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients: a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Authors:  Michael Rybak; Ben Lomaestro; John C Rotschafer; Robert Moellering; William Craig; Marianne Billeter; Joseph R Dalovisio; Donald P Levine
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.637

4.  Potential therapeutic failure of generic vancomycin in a liver transplant patient with MRSA peritonitis and bacteremia.

Authors:  Carlos A Rodriguez; Maria Agudelo; Juan C Cataño; Andres F Zuluaga; Omar Vesga
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 6.072

5.  High-dose vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  Levita K Hidayat; Donald I Hsu; Ryan Quist; Kimberly A Shriner; Annie Wong-Beringer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-10-23

6.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with various degrees of renal function.

Authors:  G R Matzke; R W McGory; C E Halstenson; W F Keane
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Acute kidney injury: definitions and new paradigms.

Authors:  Zoltán H Endre
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.620

9.  Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in a patient population: effect of age, gender, and body weight.

Authors:  M P Ducharme; R L Slaughter; D J Edwards
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  Relationship between initial vancomycin concentration-time profile and nephrotoxicity among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Thomas P Lodise; Nimish Patel; Ben M Lomaestro; Keith A Rodvold; George L Drusano
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Vancomycin with Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam, Cefepime, or Meropenem.

Authors:  Adam M Blevins; Jennifer N Lashinsky; Craig McCammon; Marin Kollef; Scott Micek; Paul Juang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Effects of staff education and standardizing dosing and collection times on vancomycin trough appropriateness in ward patients.

Authors:  Drayton A Hammond; Lexis N Atkinson; Taylor B James; Jacob T Painter; Katherine Lusardi
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2017-06-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.