Literature DB >> 26123980

Improvement in Detection of Wrong-Patient Errors When Radiologists Include Patient Photographs in Their Interpretation of Portable Chest Radiographs.

Srini Tridandapani1,2, Kevin Olsen3, Pamela Bhatti4.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine whether facial photographs obtained simultaneously with radiographs improve radiologists' detection rate of wrong-patient errors, when they are explicitly asked to include the photographs in their evaluation. Radiograph-photograph combinations were obtained from 28 patients at the time of portable chest radiography imaging. From these, pairs of radiographs were generated. Each unique pair consisted of one new and one old (comparison) radiograph. Twelve pairs of mismatched radiographs (i.e., pairs containing radiographs of different patients) were also generated. In phase 1 of the study, 5 blinded radiologist observers were asked to interpret 20 pairs of radiographs without the photographs. In phase 2, each radiologist interpreted another 20 pairs of radiographs with the photographs. Radiologist observers were not instructed about the purpose of the photographs but were asked to include the photographs in their review. The detection rate of mismatched errors was recorded along with the interpretation time for each session for each observer. The two-tailed Fisher exact test was used to evaluate differences in mismatch detection rates between the two phases. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. The error detection rates without (0/20 = 0%) and with (17/18 = 94.4%) photographs were different (p = 0.0001). The average interpretation times for the set of 20 radiographs were 26.45 (SD 8.69) and 20.55 (SD 3.40) min, for phase 1 and phase 2, respectively (two-tailed Student t test, p = 0.1911). When radiologists include simultaneously obtained photographs in their review of portable chest radiographs, there is a significant improvement in the detection of labeling errors. No statistically significant difference in interpretation time was observed. This may lead to improved patient safety without affecting radiologists' throughput.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical errors; Wrong-patient events

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123980      PMCID: PMC4636721          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9808-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  5 in total

1.  Is a picture worth a thousand words? The effect of viewing patient photographs on radiologist interpretation of CT studies.

Authors:  John Ryan; Gul-E Khanda; Rebecca Hibbert; Shawna Duigenan; Adam Tunis; Najla Fasih; Blair MacDonald; Mohammed El-Khoudary; Ania Kielar; Matthew McInnes; Vivek Virmani; Nitin Ramamurthy; Nick Kolenko; Adnan Sheikh
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.532

2.  Increasing rate of detection of wrong-patient radiographs: use of photographs obtained at time of radiography.

Authors:  Srini Tridandapani; Senthil Ramamurthy; Samuel J Galgano; James M Provenzale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care.

Authors:  John T James
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  A multiobserver study of the effects of including point-of-care patient photographs with portable radiography: a means to detect wrong-patient errors.

Authors:  Srini Tridandapani; Senthil Ramamurthy; James Provenzale; Nancy A Obuchowski; Michael G Evanoff; Pamela Bhatti
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 5.  Integrating patient digital photographs with medical imaging examinations.

Authors:  Senthil Ramamurthy; Pamela Bhatti; Chesnal D Arepalli; Mohamed Salama; James M Provenzale; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.