Literature DB >> 26123626

Humans as cucinivores: comparisons with other species.

John B Furness1,2, David M Bravo3.   

Abstract

We discuss the relations of processed foods, especially cooked foods, in the human diet to digestive tract form and function. The modern consumption of over 70% of foods and beverages in highly refined form favours the diet-related classification of humans as cucinivores, rather than omnivores. Archaeological evidence indicates that humans have consumed cooked food for at least 300-400,000 years, and divergence in genes associated with human subpopulations that utilise different foods has been shown to occur over periods of 10-30,000 years. One such divergence is the greater presence of adult lactase persistence in communities that have consumed dairy products, over periods of about 8,000 years, compared to communities not consuming dairy products. We postulate that 300-400,000 years, or 10,000-14,000 generations, is sufficient time for food processing to have influenced the form and function of the human digestive tract. It is difficult to determine how long humans have prepared foods in other ways, such as pounding, grinding, drying or fermenting, but this appears to be for at least 20,000 years, which has been sufficient time to influence gene expression for digestive enzymes. Cooking and food processing expands the range of food that can be eaten, extends food availability into lean times and enhances digestibility. Cooking also detoxifies food to some extent, destroys infective agents, decreases eating time and slightly increases the efficiency of assimilation of energy substrates. On the other hand, cooking can destroy some nutrients and produce toxic products. The human digestive system is suited to a processed food diet because of its smaller volume, notably smaller colonic volume, relative to the intestines of other species, and because of differences from other primates in dentition and facial muscles that result in lower bite strength. There is no known group of humans which does not consume cooked foods, and the modern diet is dominated by processed foods. We conclude that humans are well adapted as consumers of processed, including cooked, foods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cooking; Digestive enzymes; Digestive physiology; Food processing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123626     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-015-0919-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  56 in total

1.  Energetic consequences of thermal and nonthermal food processing.

Authors:  Rachel N Carmody; Gil S Weintraub; Richard W Wrangham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling the effect of temperature on growth of Salmonella in chicken.

Authors:  Vijay K Juneja; Martin Valenzuela Melendres; Lihan Huang; Vinod Gumudavelli; Jeyamkondan Subbiah; Harshavardhan Thippareddi
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.516

3.  COMPARATIVE GUT PHYSIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: Comparative physiology of digestion.

Authors:  J B Furness; J J Cottrell; D M Bravo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Insights into hominin phenotypic and dietary evolution from ancient DNA sequence data.

Authors:  George H Perry; Logan Kistler; Mary A Kelaita; Aaron J Sams
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Sensory biology. Evolution of sweet taste perception in hummingbirds by transformation of the ancestral umami receptor.

Authors:  Maude W Baldwin; Yasuka Toda; Tomoya Nakagita; Mary J O'Connell; Kirk C Klasing; Takumi Misaka; Scott V Edwards; Stephen D Liberles
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Consequences of a long-term raw food diet on body weight and menstruation: results of a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  C Koebnick; C Strassner; I Hoffmann; C Leitzmann
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.374

Review 7.  Nutritional characteristics of wild primate foods: do the diets of our closest living relatives have lessons for us?

Authors:  K Milton
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.008

8.  Using genetic evidence to evaluate four palaeoanthropological hypotheses for the timing of Neanderthal and modern human origins.

Authors:  Phillip Endicott; Simon Y W Ho; Chris Stringer
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.895

9.  Diet and the evolution of human amylase gene copy number variation.

Authors:  George H Perry; Nathaniel J Dominy; Katrina G Claw; Arthur S Lee; Heike Fiegler; Richard Redon; John Werner; Fernando A Villanea; Joanna L Mountain; Rajeev Misra; Nigel P Carter; Charles Lee; Anne C Stone
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  A novel protective prion protein variant that colocalizes with kuru exposure.

Authors:  Simon Mead; Jerome Whitfield; Mark Poulter; Paresh Shah; James Uphill; Tracy Campbell; Huda Al-Dujaily; Holger Hummerich; Jon Beck; Charles A Mein; Claudio Verzilli; John Whittaker; Michael P Alpers; John Collinge
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to discern if microbiome associations reflect causation in metabolic and immune disorders.

Authors:  Marijana Basic; Dominique Dardevet; Peter Michael Abuja; Silvia Bolsega; Stéphanie Bornes; Robert Caesar; Francesco Maria Calabrese; Massimo Collino; Maria De Angelis; Philippe Gérard; Miguel Gueimonde; François Leulier; Eva Untersmayr; Evelien Van Rymenant; Paul De Vos; Isabelle Savary-Auzeloux
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.