Literature DB >> 26123574

Randomized psychosocial interventions for breast cancer: impact on life purpose.

Maria G Mens1, Vicki S Helgeson1, Barry C Lembersky2, Andrew Baum2, Michael F Scheier1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study sought to identify mediators underlying the effects of an education and a peer support intervention for women with breast cancer and to determine if the efficacy of a peer support intervention is moderated by cancer severity.
METHODS: Participants included 180 patients with early stage (I or II) and 65 patients with late stage (IV) breast cancer. The study was originally planned as a 2 (early stage, late stage) × 3 (education intervention, peer support intervention, control condition) design; however, the education condition for the late stage cancer group was dropped, because of slow recruitment. Participants completed measures of well-being prior to being randomized (Time 1), then again 2 weeks after the group meetings ended (Time 2), and 6 months later (Time 3).
RESULTS: Among the participants who had attended at least one group meeting, the education intervention predicted more life purpose and marginally predicted more perceived physical health at Time 2. The peer support intervention predicted more life purpose and less depressive symptoms at Time 2. Cancer severity did not moderate these effects. The effect of the peer support intervention on depressive symptoms was mediated by life purpose. None of the intervention effects were evident at Time 3.
CONCLUSIONS: Peer support interventions have positive short-term effects on well-being, among women with late and early stage breast cancer, and these effects are partially mediated by changes in life purpose. Education interventions have positive short-term effects on well-being among women with early stage breast cancer.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123574      PMCID: PMC4945105          DOI: 10.1002/pon.3891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  30 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms in psychosocial interventions for adults living with cancer: opportunity for integration of theory, research, and practice.

Authors:  Annette L Stanton; Linda J Luecken; David P MacKinnon; Elizabeth H Thompson
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-06-04

2.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher; Andrew F Hayes
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

3.  Group coping skills instruction and supportive group therapy for cancer patients: a comparison of strategies.

Authors:  C F Telch; M J Telch
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-12

4.  Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

Authors:  D Hann; K Winter; P Jacobsen
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Predicting mood disorders in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  G Morasso; M Costantini; P Viterbori; F Bonci; L Del Mastro; M Musso; O Garrone; M Venturini
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life in adult cancer patients: meta analysis of 37 published controlled outcome studies.

Authors:  Barbara Rehse; Ralf Pukrop
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2003-06

7.  A functional genomic perspective on human well-being.

Authors:  Barbara L Fredrickson; Karen M Grewen; Kimberly A Coffey; Sara B Algoe; Ann M Firestine; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; Steven W Cole
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Psychosocial interventions for anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; Heather S Jim
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Psychometric properties of the CES-D-10 in a psychiatric sample.

Authors:  Thröstur Björgvinsson; Sarah J Kertz; Joe S Bigda-Peyton; Katrina L McCoy; Idan M Aderka
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2013-03-18

10.  Group support for patients with metastatic cancer. A randomized outcome study.

Authors:  D Spiegel; J R Bloom; I Yalom
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1981-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  The Benefits of Goal Adjustment Capacities for Well-Being Among Women With Breast Cancer: Potential Mechanisms of Action.

Authors:  Maria G Mens; Michael F Scheier
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  2015-09-10

2.  Facilitators of peer coaching/support engagement and dissemination among women at risk for and surviving with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn Rehberg; Adina Fleischmann; Elana Silber; Suzanne C O'neill; Frances Marcus Lewis; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Sense of Purpose in Life and Cardiovascular Disease: Underlying Mechanisms and Future Directions.

Authors:  Eric S Kim; Scott W Delaney; Laura D Kubzansky
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Predictors of distress in female breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ania Syrowatka; Aude Motulsky; Siyana Kurteva; James A Hanley; William G Dixon; Ari N Meguerditchian; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-05-28       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Effectiveness of peer support on health-related quality of life in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anu Susanna Toija; Tarja Helena Kettunen; Marjut Hannele Kristiina Leidenius; Tarja Hellin Kaarina Vainiola; Risto Paavo Antero Roine
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.