Literature DB >> 26123410

MRI in multiple sclerosis: an intra-individual, randomized and multicentric comparison of gadobutrol with gadoterate meglumine at 3 T.

Marc Saake1, Soenke Langner2, Carsten Schwenke3, Marina Weibart4, Olav Jansen5, Norbert Hosten2, Arnd Doerfler4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare contrast effects of gadobutrol with gadoterate meglumine for brain MRI in multiple sclerosis (MS) in a multicentre, randomized, prospective, intraindividual study at 3 T.
METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Patients with known or suspected active MS lesions were included. Two identical MRIs were performed using randomized contrast agent order. Four post-contrast T1 sequences were acquired (start time points 0, 3, 6 and 9 min). If no enhancing lesion was present in first MRI, second MRI was cancelled. Quantitative (number and signal intensity of enhancing lesions) and qualitative parameters (time points of first and all lesions enhancing; subjective preference regarding contrast enhancement and lesion delineation; global preference) were evaluated blinded.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (male, 26; mean age, 35 years) were enrolled in three centres. In 45 patients enhancing lesions were found. Number of enhancing lesions increased over time for both contrast agents without significant difference (median 2 for both). Lesions signal intensity was significantly higher for gadobutrol (p < 0.05 at time points 3, 6 and 9 min). Subjective preference rating showed non-significant tendency in favour of gadobutrol.
CONCLUSION: Both gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine can be used for imaging of acute inflammatory MS lesions. However, gadobutrol generates higher lesion SI. KEY POINTS: Contrast-enhanced MRI plays a key role in the management of multiple sclerosis. Different gadolinium-based contrast agents are available. Number of visibly enhancing lesions increases over time after contrast injection. Gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine do not differ in number of visible lesions. Gadobutrol generates higher signal intensity than gadoterate meglumine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gadolinium-based contrast agent; Inflammation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; Signal intensity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26123410     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3889-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla.

Authors:  J P Wansapura; S K Holland; R S Dunn; W S Ball
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Sensitivity of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M Filippi; T Yousry; M A Rocca; G Fesl; R Voltz; G Comi
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Standardized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines.

Authors:  J H Simon; D Li; A Traboulsee; P K Coyle; D L Arnold; F Barkhof; J A Frank; R Grossman; D W Paty; E W Radue; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Cerebral neoplastic enhancing lesions: multicenter, randomized, crossover intraindividual comparison between gadobutrol (1.0M) and gadoterate meglumine (0.5M) at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg body weight in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Nicoletta Anzalone; Tommaso Scarabino; Carlo Venturi; Concetto Cristaudo; Armando Tartaro; Giuseppe Scotti; Domenico Zimatore; Roberto Floris; Alessandro Carriero; Marcello Longo; Mario Cirillo; Maria Assunta Cova; Simona Gatti; Matthias Voth; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Dual-temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI protocol for blood-brain barrier permeability measurement in enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions.

Authors:  I O Jelescu; I R Leppert; S Narayanan; D Araújo; D L Arnold; G B Pike
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination.

Authors:  C Lucchinetti; W Brück; J Parisi; B Scheithauer; M Rodriguez; H Lassmann
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Brain MRI lesion load at 1.5T and 3T versus clinical status in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  James M Stankiewicz; Bonnie I Glanz; Brian C Healy; Ashish Arora; Mohit Neema; Ralph H B Benedict; Zachary D Guss; Shahamat Tauhid; Guy J Buckle; Maria K Houtchens; Samia J Khoury; Howard L Weiner; Charles R G Guttmann; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Detection of cerebral metastases on magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Nicoletta Anzalone; Simonetta Gerevini; Roberta Scotti; Paolo Vezzulli; Piero Picozzi
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Quantification of subtle blood-brain barrier disruption in non-enhancing lesions in multiple sclerosis: a study of disease and lesion subtypes.

Authors:  D Soon; D J Tozer; D R Altmann; P S Tofts; D H Miller
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.

Authors:  Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Kedar R Mahajan; Daniel Ontaneda
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  PET/MRI of central nervous system: current status and future perspective.

Authors:  Zhen Lu Yang; Long Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: intraindividual comparison of gadoterate meglumine and gadobutrol.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Hamm; Patrick Asbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhancement Parameters between Gadobutrol and Gadoterate Meglumine in Posttreatment Glioma: A Prospective Intraindividual Study.

Authors:  J E Park; J Y Kim; H S Kim; W H Shim
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Prospective intraindividual comparison of gadoterate and gadobutrol for cervical and intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Philip Hoelter; Stefan Lang; Marina Weibart; Manuel Schmidt; Michael F X Knott; Tobias Engelhorn; Marco Essig; Stephan Kloska; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Chemically-defined camelid antibody bioconjugate for the magnetic resonance imaging of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Matthias Vandesquille; Tengfei Li; Chrystelle Po; Christelle Ganneau; Pascal Lenormand; Clémence Dudeffant; Christian Czech; Fiona Grueninger; Charles Duyckaerts; Benoît Delatour; Marc Dhenain; Pierre Lafaye; Sylvie Bay
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.857

7.  Safety of Gadobutrol: Results From 42 Clinical Phase II to IV Studies and Postmarketing Surveillance After 29 Million Applications.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Kai Vogtlaender; Susan Dohanish; Thomas Balzer; Josy Breuer
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 8.  Gadobutrol in India-A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Efficacy.

Authors:  Jan Endrikat; Nicoletta Anzalone
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2017-09-11

9.  In Vivo Detection of Amyloid Plaques by Gadolinium-Stained MRI Can Be Used to Demonstrate the Efficacy of an Anti-amyloid Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Mathieu D Santin; Michel E Vandenberghe; Anne-Sophie Herard; Laurent Pradier; Caroline Cohen; Thomas Debeir; Thierry Delzescaux; Thomas Rooney; Marc Dhenain
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Gadobutrol in Renally Impaired Patients: Results of the GRIP Study.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Manuela Aschauer; Hannes Deutschmann; Georg Bongartz; Matthias Gutberlet; Ramona Woitek; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Walter Kucharczyk; Renate Hammerstingl; Francesco De Cobelli; Martin Rosenberg; Thomas Balzer; Jan Endrikat
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.