Literature DB >> 26122858

Computational analysis and ratiometric comparison approaches aimed to assist column selection in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry targeted metabolomics.

Ioannis Sampsonidis1, Michael Witting2, Wendelin Koch3, Christina Virgiliou1, Helen G Gika4, Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin5, Georgios A Theodoridis6.   

Abstract

In the present work two different approaches, a semi-quantitative and a Derringer function approach, were developed to assist column selection for method development in targeted metabolomics. These approaches were applied in the performance assessment of three HILIC columns with different chemistries (an amide, a diol and a zwitterionic phase). This was the first step for the development of a HILIC UPLC-MS/MS method that should be capable to analyze a large number of polar metabolites. Two gradient elution profiles and two mobile phase pH values were tested for the analysis of multi-analyte mixtures. Acquired chromatographic data were firstly treated by a ratiometric, "semi-quantitative" approach which quantifies various overall analysis parameters (e.g. the percent of detected compounds, retentivity and resolved critical pairs). These parameters were used to assess chromatographic performance in a rather conventional/traditional and cumbersome/labor-intensive way. Secondly, a comprehensive and automated comparison of the three columns was performed by monitoring several well-known chromatographic parameters (peak width, resolution, tailing factor, etc.) using a lab-built programming script which calculates overall desirability utilizing Derringer functions. Derringer functions exhibit the advantage that column performance is ultimately expressed in an objective single and quantitative value which can be easily interpreted. In summary, results show that each column exhibits unique strengths in metabolic profiling of polar compounds. The applied methodology proved useful for the selection of the most effective chromatographic system during method development for LC-MS/MS targeted metabolomics, while it could further assist in the selection of chromatographic conditions for the development of multi-analyte methods.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Column comparison; Derringer's functions; HILIC–MS; Multi-analyte methods; Targeted metabolomics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122858     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  3 in total

1.  Comprehensive Optimization of LC-MS Metabolomics Methods Using Design of Experiments (COLMeD).

Authors:  Seth D Rhoades; Aalim M Weljie
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 4.290

2.  Evaluation of coverage, retention patterns, and selectivity of seven liquid chromatographic methods for metabolomics.

Authors:  Stefanie Wernisch; Subramaniam Pennathur
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Choosing an Optimal Sample Preparation in Caulobacter crescentus for Untargeted Metabolomics Approaches.

Authors:  Julian Pezzatti; Matthieu Bergé; Julien Boccard; Santiago Codesido; Yoric Gagnebin; Patrick H Viollier; Víctor González-Ruiz; Serge Rudaz
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-09-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.