Literature DB >> 26122761

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Admission After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Gregory A Coté1, Sheryl Lynch2, Jeffery J Easler2, Alyson Keen3, Patricia A Vassell3, Stuart Sherman2, Siu Hui4, Huiping Xu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In outpatients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with anesthesia, rates of and risk factors for admission are unclear. We aimed to develop a model that would allow physicians to predict hospitalization of patients during postanesthesia recovery.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of data from ERCPs performed on outpatients from May 2012 through October 2013 at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Medical records were abstracted for preanesthesia, intra-anesthesia, and early (within the first hour) postanesthesia characteristics potentially associated with admission. Significant factors associated with admission were incorporated into a logistic regression model to identify subgroups with low, moderate, or high probabilities for admission. The population was divided into training (first 12 months) and validation (last 6 months) sets to develop and test the model.
RESULTS: We identified 3424 ERCPs during the study period; 10.7% of patients were admitted to the hospital, and 3.7% developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. Postanesthesia recovery times were significantly longer for patients requiring admission (362.6 ± 213.0 minutes vs 218.4 ± 71.8 minutes for patients not admitted; P < .0001). A higher proportion of admitted patients had high-risk indications. Admitted patients also had more severe comorbidities, higher baseline levels of pain, longer procedure times, performance of sphincter of Oddi manometry, higher pain during the first hour after anesthesia, and greater use of opiates or anxiolytics. A multivariate regression model identified patients who were admitted with a high level of accuracy in the training set (area under the curve, 0.83) and fair accuracy in the validation set (area under the curve, 0.78). On the basis of this model, nearly 50% of patients could be classified as low risk for admission.
CONCLUSION: By using factors that can be assessed through the first hour after ERCP, we developed a model that accurately predicts which patients are likely to be admitted to the hospital. Rates of admission after outpatient ERCP are low, so a policy of prolonged observation might be unnecessary.
Copyright © 2015 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Pancreas; Risk Factors; Sedation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122761      PMCID: PMC4655134          DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  26 in total

1.  Moderate sedation for elective upper endoscopy with balanced propofol versus fentanyl and midazolam alone: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  B E Levitzky; R Lopez; J A Dumot; J J Vargo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Association between volume of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at an academic medical center and use of pancreatobiliary therapy.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Sanjeev Singh; Lois G Bucksot; Laura Lazzell-Pannell; Suzette E Schmidt; Evan Fogel; Lee McHenry; James Watkins; Glen Lehman; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Balanced propofol sedation versus propofol monosedation in therapeutic pancreaticobiliary endoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Chang Kyun Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Hyun Jong Choi; Sang Woo Cha; Jong Ho Moon; Young Deok Cho; Young Hwangbo; Sun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Predictive factors of early morphine requirements in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU).

Authors:  S Dahmani; H Dupont; J Mantz; J M Desmonts; H Keita
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Therapeutic ERCP in outpatients.

Authors:  T C Tham; J Vandervoort; R C Wong; D R Lichtenstein; J Van Dam; F Ruymann; F Farraye; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Donald A Garrow; Joseph Gallagher; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  An extension of the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test for complex sample survey data.

Authors:  Sundar Natarajan; Stuart R Lipsitz; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Debajyoti Sinha; Joseph G Ibrahim; Jennifer Haas; Walid Gellad
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.864

8.  Incorporation of clustering effects for the Wilcoxon rank sum test: a large-sample approach.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Robert J Glynn; Mei-Ling Ting Lee
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  ERCP as an outpatient treatment: a review.

Authors:  Suzanne M Jeurnink; Jan Werner Poley; Ewout W Steyerberg; Ernst J Kuipers; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Association of greater intravenous volume infusion with shorter hospitalization for patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Sashidhar V Sagi; Suzette Schmidt; Evan Fogel; Glen A Lehman; Lee McHenry; Stuart Sherman; James Watkins; Gregory A Coté
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Anesthetist-Directed Sedation Favors Success of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.

Authors:  James Buxbaum; Nitzan Roth; Nima Motamedi; Terrance Lee; Paul Leonor; Mark Salem; Dolores Gibbs; John Vargo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ruhua Zheng; Mengjie Chen; Xuying Wang; Bingqiang Li; Ting He; Lei Wang; Guifang Xu; Yuling Yao; Jun Cao; Yonghua Shen; Yi Wang; Hao Zhu; Bin Zhang; Han Wu; Xiaoping Zou; Guoping He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

3.  Three-hour post-ERCP amylase level: a useful indicator for early prediction of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Ze-Hui Lv; Da-Qing Kou; Shi-Bin Guo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Patient perception and preference of EUS-guided drainage over percutaneous drainage when endoscopic transpapillary biliary drainage fails: An international multicenter survey.

Authors:  Kwangwoo Nam; Dong Uk Kim; Tae Hoon Lee; Takuji Iwashita; Yousuke Nakai; Ahmed Bolkhir; Lara Aguilera Castro; Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros; Carlos de la Serna; Manuel Perez-Miranda; John G Lee; Sang Soo Lee; Dong-Wan Seo; Sung Koo Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim; Do Hyun Park
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.