| Literature DB >> 26122757 |
Kelly Jakubowski1, Nicolas Farrugia2, Andrea R Halpern3, Sathish K Sankarpandi4, Lauren Stewart5.
Abstract
The study of spontaneous and everyday cognitions is an area of rapidly growing interest. One of the most ubiquitous forms of spontaneous cognition is involuntary musical imagery (INMI), the involuntarily retrieved and repetitive mental replay of music. The present study introduced a novel method for capturing temporal features of INMI within a naturalistic setting. This method allowed for the investigation of two questions of interest to INMI researchers in a more objective way than previously possible, concerning (1) the precision of memory representations within INMI and (2) the interactions between INMI and concurrent affective state. Over the course of 4 days, INMI tempo was measured by asking participants to tap to the beat of their INMI with a wrist-worn accelerometer. Participants documented additional details regarding their INMI in a diary. Overall, the tempo of music within INMI was recalled from long-term memory in a highly veridical form, although with a regression to the mean for recalled tempo that parallels previous findings on voluntary musical imagery. A significant positive relationship was found between INMI tempo and subjective arousal, suggesting that INMI interacts with concurrent mood in a similar manner to perceived music. The results suggest several parallels between INMI and voluntary imagery, music perceptual processes, and other types of involuntary memories.Entities:
Keywords: Imagery; Involuntary memory; Involuntary musical imagery; Music cognition; Spontaneous cognition; Tempo
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26122757 PMCID: PMC4624826 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0531-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Cognit ISSN: 0090-502X
Fig. 1Example text used to explain the meaning of a “beat” to participants. Bold and underlined syllables correspond to beats in the music
Fig. 2Graphical examples (from top to bottom) of (1) accelerometer movement data (minus the first ten excluded taps; circles denote local maxima), (2) series of corresponding inter-tap intervals, and (3) three individual taps from graph 1 (enlarged for clarity)
Fig. 3Percentages of involuntary musical imagery (INMI) episodes for which each trigger was reported. (Note: As multiple triggers could be reported for each episode, these percentages total to over 100 %)
Fig. 4Tempo distribution of all 228 involuntary musical imagery (INMI) episodes with usable tempo data
Fig. 5Original, recorded tempo for each of the 132 songs that exist in canonical versions plotted against the tempo each song was tapped at when experienced as involuntary musical imagery (INMI)
Consistency of tempi for songs experienced as involuntary musical imagery (INMI) at least three times
| Song | Number of INMI episodes | Slowest tempo (bpm) | Fastest tempo (bpm) | Difference between slowest and fastest version (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Sky Full of Stars | 3 | 82.5 | 116.9 | 41.7 |
| Miss You | 3 | 98.5 | 112.7 | 14.4 |
| Ponta de Areia | 3 | 63.0 | 74.3 | 18.0 |
| Spirited Away One Summer's Day | 3 | 78.6 | 82.6 | 5.1 |
| One | 4 | 81.4 | 93.2 | 14.4 |
| You're So Vain | 5 | 111.2 | 119.6 | 7.5 |
| For Unto Us a Child is Born | 6 | 74.6 | 105.0 | 40.6 |
| Non Voglio Cantare | 6 | 117.4 | 134.8 | 14.8 |
Correlations of musical features of involuntary musical imagery (INMI) and mood variables
| Tempo | Mode | Arousal | Positivity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tempo | 1.00 | |||
| Mode | –.003 | 1.00 | ||
| Arousal | .14* | .10 | 1.00 | |
| Positivity | .15* | –.09 | .07 | 1.00 |
Note * signifies a significant correlation at the level of p < .05. Coding for the INMI mode variable is: 1=minor, 2=major
Linear mixed-effects models with mood variables as predictors of INMI tempo
| Coefficient | S.E. |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1: Arousal and Positivity as predictors of INMI tempo | ||||
| Intercept | 81.24 | 12.99 | 6.26 | < .001 |
| Arousal | 1.87 | 0.67 | 2.78 | .01* |
| Positivity | 0.08 | 1.11 | 0.08 | .94 |
| Model 2: Arousal as a predictor of INMI tempo | ||||
| Intercept | 82.06 | 7.23 | 11.35 | < .001 |
| Arousal | 1.87 | 0.67 | 2.79 | .01** |
* signifies a significant predictor at the level of p < .05. BIC = 2163.98
** signifies a significant predictor at the level of p < .05. BIC = 2160.62
Linear mixed-effects model with mood variables as predictors of INMI mode
| Coefficient | S.E. |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.47 | 1.43 | 1.03 | .30 |
| Arousal | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1.67 | .10 |
| Positivity | –0.10 | 0.13 | –0.76 | .45 |