| Literature DB >> 26122573 |
Alexandra Kroll1, Marianne Matzke2, Marcus Rybicki3, Patrick Obert-Rauser3, Corinna Burkart3, Kerstin Jurkschat4, Rudo Verweij5, Linn Sgier6, Dirk Jungmann3, Thomas Backhaus7, Claus Svendsen2.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">Silver nanoparticles (<ass="Chemical">span class="Chemical">AgNP) are currently defined as emerging pollutants in surface water ecosystems. Whether the toxic effects of AgNP towards freshwater organisms are fully explainable by the release of ionic silver (Ag(+)) has not been conclusively elucidated. Long-term effects to benthic microbial communities (periphyton) that provide essential functions in stream ecosystems are unknown. The effects of exposure of periphyton to 2 and 20 μg/L Ag(+) (AgNO3) and AgNP (polyvinylpyrrolidone stabilised) were investigated in artificial indoor streams. The extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and 3D biofilm structure, biomass, algae species, Ag concentrations in the water phase and bioassociated Ag were analysed. A strong decrease in total Ag was observed within 4 days. Bioassociated Ag was proportional to dissolved Ag indicating a rate limitation by diffusion across the diffusive boundary layer. Two micrograms per liter of AgNO3 or AgNP did not induce significant effects despite detectable bioassociation of Ag. The 20-μg/L AgNO3 affected green algae and diatom communities, biomass and the ratio of polysaccharides to proteins in EPS. The 20-μg/L AgNO3 and AgNP decreased biofilm volume to about 50 %, while the decrease of biomass was lower in 20 μg/L AgNP samples than the 20-μg/L AgNO3 indicating a compaction of the NP-exposed biofilms. Roughness coefficients were lower in 20 μg/L AgNP-treated samples. The more traditional endpoints (biomass and diversity) indicated silver ion concentration-dependent effects, while the newly introduced parameters (3D structure and EPS) indicated both silver ion concentration-dependent effects and effects related to the silver species applied.Entities:
Keywords: 3D structure; Biofilms; Community ecotoxicology; Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS); Periphyton; Silver nanoparticles
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26122573 PMCID: PMC4766215 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4887-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Experimental schedule
| Day [d] | −11 | −10 | −6 | −5 | −4 | −2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 18 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setup | |||||||||||||||
| Biofilm collection | x | ||||||||||||||
| Start AIS | x | ||||||||||||||
| Addition of phosphorous | x | x | |||||||||||||
| Addition of supplements to AIS | x | ||||||||||||||
| Transfer of tiles to AIS | x | ||||||||||||||
| Addition of NOM | x | ||||||||||||||
| Start of exposure | x | ||||||||||||||
| Biological endpoints | |||||||||||||||
| Silver analysis (bioassociation) | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||
| Taxonomy (light microscopy) | x | x | x | ||||||||||||
| Biomass (POC) | x | x | x | x | |||||||||||
| Biomass (dry weight) | x | ||||||||||||||
| 3D structure (CLSM) | x | ||||||||||||||
| EPS (LC-OCD-OND) | x | ||||||||||||||
| Physicochemical parameters | |||||||||||||||
| EC, pH, O2 | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | ||||
| SRP-P, nitrogen (N-NO3, N-NO2, N-NH4) | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||||
| Si, Ca, Mg | x | x | x | x | |||||||||||
| Cl−, F− | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||||||||
| NOM | x | x | |||||||||||||
| Silver analysis (total/dissolved) | x | x | x | x | x | ||||||||||
Range of total and dissolved Ag in the AIS measured on d0, d4, d11 and d18 and Ag associated with DGT samplers deployed from d11 to d18 (measured concentration (MC), LOQ 0.01 μg/L) and in percent of the nominal concentration (% NC) relative to the Ag concentration measured in the AgNP and AgNO3 stocks. Each AIS was sampled twice at each time point
| Ag2 (2 μg/L) | Ag20 (20 μg/L) | NP2 (μg/L) | NP20 (μg/L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC [μg/L] | % NC | MC [μg/L] | % NC | MC [μg/L] | % NC | MC [μg/L] | % NC | ||
| Total Ag | d0 | 1.37–1.37 | 75.92–75.92 | 15.52–17.07 | 86.22–94.83 | 1.09–1.16 | 68.03–72.41 | 12.94–14.59 | 80.90–91.21 |
| d4 | 0.29–0.64 | 16.10–35.71 | 1.15–1.44 | 6.36–7.99 | 0.28–0.31 | 17.53–19.34 | 2.28–2.28 | 14.27–14.27 | |
| d11 | <LOD | <LOD | 0.48–0.63 | 2.68–3.50 | <LOD–0.15 | <LOD–9.41 | 0.84–0.90 | 5.24–5.60 | |
| d18 | 0.12–0.12 | 6.75–6.75 | 0.26–1.42 | 7.44–7.86 | 0.09–0.10 | 5.84–6.16 | 0.42–0.45 | 2.63–2.82 | |
| Dissolved Ag | d0 | 1.13–1.26 | 63.01–69.76 | 13.7–13.72 | 76.13–76.24 | 0.38–0.47 | 23.83–29.48 | 4.16–4.86 | 26.03–30.36 |
| d4 | 0.17–0.17 | 9.25–9.25 | 0.61–0.69 | 3.42–3.86 | 0.07–0.14 | 4.08–8.68 | 1.47–1.57 | 9.22–9.79 | |
| d11 | <LOD | <LOD | 0.21–0.29 | 1.16–1.59 | <LOD–0.07 | <LOD–4.47 | 0.82–0.83 | 5.11–5.20 | |
| d18 | <LOD–0.01 | <LOD–0.56 | 0.14–0.35 | 1.76–4.4 | <LOD–0.08 | <LOD–5.03 | 0.38–0.39 | 2.40–2.42 | |
| DGT-associated Ag (8 days) | d11–18 | 0.06–0.06 | 3.17–3.18 | 0.16–0.17 | 2.01–2.14 | 0.04–0.05 | 2.25–2.94 | 0.43–0.47 | 2.68–2.91 |
Range of the fraction of dissolved Ag in percent relative to total Ag detected in the AIS. Each AIS was sampled twice at each time point
| Ag2 | Ag20 | NP2 | NP20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| d0 | 82.48–91.97 | 80.37–88.27 | 32.76–43.12 | 32.15–33.31 |
| d4 | 26.56–58.62 | 42.36–60.00 | 25.00–45.16 | 64.47–68.86 |
| d11 | <LOD | 43.75–46.03 | <LOD | 92.22–97.62 |
| d18 | <LOD–8.33 | 23.65–24.65 | <LOD–88.89 | 84.44–92.86 |
Fig. 1Silver associated with periphyton per tile, based on biomass as dry weight. a Control AIS and AIS exposed to 2 μg/L AgNP or AgNO3; b control AIS and AIS exposed to 20 μg/L AgNP or AgNO3. *** and *: significantly different from control 1 and control 2 (p d4 < 0.0001, p d11 < 0.0001, p d18 = 0.0091; F d4 = 29.12, F d11 = 99.89, F d18 = 4.336; one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s post hoc test)
Total bioassociated Ag in percent of total Ag measured in the water phase over time in the AIS containing nominal concentrations of 2 or 20 μg/L AgNO3 (Ag2, Ag20) or PVP-AgNP (NP2, NP20)
| Ag2 | Ag20 | NP2 | NP20 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 day | 0.2 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 0.07 |
| 4 days | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 11 days | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| 18 days | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
Fig. 2Semi-quantitative species and genera abundance of diatoms and green algae in the six AIS on d18 of the experiment. The abundance groups 5 to 1 (5, : >30 %; 4, : 30–10 %; 3, : 10–3 %; 2, : 3–1 %; 1, : <1 %) are depicted as large to small rectangles for easier interpretation. The groups in numbers are presented in Table S7
Fig. 3Median values of POC (n = 6) and dry weight (n = 3) of periphyton [mg/cm2] with bars indicating the range. ***p < 0.001, significantly different from control 1 and control 2 (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s post-test, Table S3)
Fig. 4a Ratio of organic carbon to organic nitrogen (C/N) in the biopolymer fraction of EPS extracts on d18. C/N in Ag20 samples was significantly different from control 1 and control 2 (p = 0.014, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s post hoc test). b Total volume of chlorophyll-positive, HPA-lectin-positive and reflecting structures modelled based on CLSM data (d18). Each data point corresponds to one z-stack, five stacks were acquired per patch/tile and two tiles were measured per treatment/AIS except for Ag20 as the biomass was too low on the second randomly sampled tile. *p < 0.0001 (Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s post hoc test). c Roughness coefficient based on the modelled volume of chlorophyll-positive, HPA-lectin-positive and reflecting structures (d18). Each data point corresponds to one z-stack, five stacks were acquired per patch/tile and two tiles were sampled per treatment/AIS except for Ag20 as the biomass was too low on the second randomly sampled tile. *p = 0.0068 (Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s post hoc test)