Literature DB >> 26122371

Attitudes and Perceptions of Surgical Oncology Fellows on ACGME Accreditation and the Complex General Surgical Oncology Certification.

David Y Lee1, Devin C Flaherty1, Briana J Lau1, Gary B Deutsch1, Daniel D Kirchoff1, Kelly T Huynh1, Ji-Hey Lee2, Mark B Faries1, Anton J Bilchik3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the first qualifying examination administered September 15, 2014, complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) is now a board-certified specialty. We aimed to assess the attitudes and perceptions of current and future surgical oncology fellows regarding the recently instituted Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation.
METHODS: A 29-question anonymous survey was distributed to fellows in surgical oncology fellowship programs and applicants interviewing at our fellowship program.
RESULTS: There were 110 responses (79 fellows and 31 candidates). The response rate for the first- and second-year fellows was 66 %. Ninety-percent of the respondents were aware that completing an ACGME-accredited fellowship leads to board eligibility in CGSO. However, the majority (80 %) of the respondents stated that their decision to specialize in surgical oncology was not influenced by the ACGME accreditation. The fellows in training were concerned about the cost of the exam (90 %) and expressed anxiety in preparing for another board exam (83 %). However, the majority of the respondents believed that CGSO board certification will be helpful (79 %) in obtaining their future career goals. Interestingly, candidate fellows appeared more focused on a career in general complex surgical oncology (p = 0.004), highlighting the impact that fellowship training may have on organ-specific subspecialization.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the surveyed surgical oncology fellows and candidates believe that obtaining board certification in CGSO is important and will help them pursue their career goals. However, the decision to specialize in surgical oncology does not appear to be motivated by ACGME accreditation or the new board certification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122371     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4688-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  5 in total

1.  Cancer care in the developed world: A comparison of surgical oncology training programs.

Authors:  Motaz Qadan; Andrew R Davies; Hiram C Polk; William H Allum; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  CORR Insights®: Are Recently Trained Tumor Fellows Performing Less Tumor Surgery? An Analysis of 10 Years of the ABOS Part II Database.

Authors:  Herbert S Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Survey of Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates 2005-2016: Insight into Initial Practice.

Authors:  Samantha Ruff; Sadia Ilyas; Seth M Steinberg; Zaria Tatalovich; Sarah A McLaughlin; Michael D'Angelica; Chandrajit P Raut; Keith A Delman; Jonathan M Hernandez; Jeremy L Davis
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Exploring Pediatric Resident Attitudes and Preferences for Board Exam Preparation.

Authors:  Alex Liu; Suzanne Reed; John D Mahan; Rebecca Wallihan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-08

5.  Application and Match Rates in the Complex General Surgical Oncology Match.

Authors:  Jason Silvestre; Jessica R Smith; Kindha E Nasef; Lori L Wilson; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.339

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.