Literature DB >> 2612235

Ceftriaxone versus imipenem/cilastatin as empirical monotherapy for infections in cancer patients.

G Bucaneve1, F Menichetti, V Minotti, M B Pasticci, M Tonato, A Del Favero.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and tolerability of monotherapy with ceftriaxone (active ingredient of Rocephin) (CRO) versus imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) in febrile cancer patients with or without neutropenia. 120 febrile episodes were randomized and 89 (75%) were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The overall response rates to both regimens were good (86 and 79% improved in response to CRO and I/C, respectively). Overall mortality was low and similar in the two groups. Both regimens were well tolerated. Our preliminary data corroborate the efficacy of CRO or I/C as empirical monotherapy for febrile episodes in cancer patients. It will be up to future investigations to show whether one of these regimens is superior to the other.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2612235     DOI: 10.1159/000238733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemotherapy        ISSN: 0009-3157            Impact factor:   2.544


  3 in total

1.  Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; A E Simor; L Vercaigne; L Mandell
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07

2.  Ceftriaxone. A pharmacoeconomic evaluation of its use in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  R Davis; H M Bryson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Ceftriaxone in the outpatient treatment of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.

Authors:  M Karthaus; G Egerer; K H Kullmann; J Ritter; H Jürgens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.267

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.