Literature DB >> 26122282

Validity of energy intake estimated by digital photography plus recall in overweight and obese young adults.

Lauren T Ptomey, Erik A Willis, Jeffery J Honas, Matthew S Mayo, Richard A Washburn, Stephen D Herrmann, Debra K Sullivan, Joseph E Donnelly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have questioned the adequacy of self-report measures of dietary intake as the basis for scientific conclusions regarding the associations of dietary intake and health, and reports have recommended the development and evaluation of better methods for the assessment of dietary intake in free-living individuals. We developed a procedure that used pre- and post-meal digital photographs in combination with dietary recalls (DP+R) to assess energy intake during ad libitum eating in a cafeteria setting.
OBJECTIVE: To compare mean daily energy intake of overweight and obese young adults assessed by a DP+R method with mean total daily energy expenditure assessed by doubly labeled water (TDEE(DLW)).
METHODS: Energy intake was assessed using the DP+R method in 91 overweight and obese young adults (age = 22.9±3.2 years, body mass index [BMI; calculated as kg/m(2)]=31.2±5.6, female=49%) over 7 days of ad libitum eating in a university cafeteria. Foods consumed outside the cafeteria (ie, snacks, non-cafeteria meals) were assessed using multiple-pass recall procedures, using food models and standardized, neutral probing questions. TDEE(DLW) was assessed in all participants over the 14-day period.
RESULTS: The mean energy intakes estimated by DP+R and TDEE(DLW) were not significantly different (DP+R=2912±661 kcal/d; TDEE(DLW)=2849±748 kcal/d, P=0.42). The DP+R method overestimated TDEE(DLW) by 63±750 kcal/d (6.8±28%).
CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the DP+R method provides estimates of energy intake comparable to those obtained by TDEE(DLW).
Copyright © 2015 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet intake; Digital photography; Doubly labeled water; Energy balance; Food records

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26122282      PMCID: PMC4555004          DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet        ISSN: 2212-2672            Impact factor:   4.910


  41 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Validity and reliability of a dietary assessment method: the application of a digital camera with a mobile phone card attachment.

Authors:  Da-Hong Wang; Michiko Kogashiwa; Sachiko Ohta; Shohei Kira
Journal:  J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Comparison of digital photography to weighed and visual estimation of portion sizes.

Authors:  Donald A Williamson; H Raymond Allen; Pamela Davis Martin; Anthony J Alfonso; Bonnie Gerald; Alice Hunt
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2003-09

4.  Quality control in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Nutrition Modality.

Authors:  J L Tillotson; D D Gorder; A G DuChene; P V Grambsch; J Wenz
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

Review 5.  Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report.

Authors:  D A Schoeller
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.694

6.  Resting metabolic rate and diet-induced thermogenesis: a methodological reappraisal.

Authors:  J A Weststrate
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities.

Authors:  H L Taylor; D R Jacobs; B Schucker; J Knudsen; A S Leon; G Debacker
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1978

Review 8.  Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method.

Authors:  D A Schoeller; L G Bandini; W H Dietz
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Development of a new instrument for evaluating individuals' dietary intakes.

Authors:  Da-Hong Wang; Michiko Kogashiwa; Shohei Kira
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2006-10

Review 10.  Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water.

Authors:  D A Schoeller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.798

View more
  18 in total

1.  Advances and Controversies in Diet and Physical Activity Measurement in Youth.

Authors:  Donna Spruijt-Metz; Cheng K Fred Wen; Brooke M Bell; Stephen Intille; Jeannie S Huang; Tom Baranowski
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Review of the validity and feasibility of image-assisted methods for dietary assessment.

Authors:  Christoph Höchsmann; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Perspective: Opportunities and Challenges of Technology Tools in Dietary and Activity Assessment: Bridging Stakeholder Viewpoints.

Authors:  Sai Krupa Das; Akari J Miki; Caroline M Blanchard; Edward Sazonov; Cheryl H Gilhooly; Sujit Dey; Colton B Wolk; Chor San H Khoo; James O Hill; Robin P Shook
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 11.567

4.  The Impact of Exercise and Cumulative Physical Activity on Energy Intake and Diet Quality in Adults Enrolled in The Midwest Exercise Trial for The Prevention of Weight Regain.

Authors:  Lauren T Ptomey; Robert N Montgomery; Anna M Gorczyca; Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Debra K Sullivan; Mary Hastert; Rachel Ns Foster; Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 4.125

5.  Video chat technology to remotely quantify dietary, supplement and medication adherence in clinical trials.

Authors:  Courtney M Peterson; John W Apolzan; Courtney Wright; Corby K Martin
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  Comparison of energy intake assessed by image-assisted food records to doubly labelled water in adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a feasibility study.

Authors:  L T Ptomey; E A Willis; K Reitmeier; M L Dreyer Gillette; J R Sherman; D K Sullivan
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2021-01-14

7.  Investigating sex differences in the accuracy of dietary assessment methods to measure energy intake in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Briar L McKenzie; Daisy H Coyle; Joseph Alvin Santos; Tracy Burrows; Emalie Rosewarne; Sanne A E Peters; Cheryl Carcel; Lindsay M Jaacks; Robyn Norton; Clare E Collins; Mark Woodward; Jacqui Webster
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Development and Validation of a Photographic Method to Use for Dietary Assessment in School Settings.

Authors:  Anna S Olafsdottir; Agneta Hörnell; Marlene Hedelin; Maria Waling; Ingibjörg Gunnarsdottir; Cecilia Olsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Scaling up Dietary Data for Decision-Making in Low-Income Countries: New Technological Frontiers.

Authors:  Winnie Bell; Brooke A Colaiezzi; Cathleen S Prata; Jennifer C Coates
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.701

10.  Distance learning strategies for weight management utilizing online social networks versus group phone conference call.

Authors:  Erik A Willis; Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Lauren T Ptomey; Felicia L Steger; Jeffery J Honas; Eyad M Al-Hihi; Robert Lee; Jaehoon Lee; Youngha Oh; Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly
Journal:  Obes Sci Pract       Date:  2017-05-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.