A Ardeshirylajimi1, S Farhadian2, F Jamshidi Adegani3, S Mirzaei4, M Soufi Zomorrod5, L Langroudi6, A Doostmohammadi7, E Seyedjafari8, M Soleimani5. 1. Department of Stem Cell Biology, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, 1997775555, Iran. 2. Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, 1088, Hungary. 3. Department of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, 1997775555, Iran. 4. Department of Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering, Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Tehran, 1997775555, Iran. 5. Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran. 6. Department of Medical Immunology, Faculty of Medical Science, Tatbiat Modares University, Tehran, 14115-111, Iran. 7. Materials Department, Engineering Faculty, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, 8818634139, Iran. 8. Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-6455, Iran.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is growing need for new scaffold constructions for synthetic bone graft substitutes to repair large bone lesions. A very promising and important class of new implants for tissue engineering is based on three-dimensional scaffolds and bioceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, after investigation of mechanical properties of polyethersulphone (PES) nanofibres, fabricated by electrospinning methodology and coated with bioactive glass (BG), cells of the MG-63 line were cultured on surfaces of these scaffolds. Their capacity to support MG-63 proliferation was also investigated in vitro by MTT assay. Osteoconductivity on these scaffolds was investigated by the common osteogenic markers alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, calcium mineral deposition and bone-related gene activation. Next, a bone reconstruction of rat critical-size defects model was evaluated using radiographic imaging analysis (digital mammography), computed tomography and histological examination. RESULTS: In vitro results indicated that biocompatibility and osteogenic markers of MG-63 cells were significantly enhanced after coating PES with BG. Based on in vivo results, new bone formation in the defect site was enhanced in implanted rats in comparison with a control group. The highest reconstruction was observed in animals implanted with BG-coated nanofibres. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoconductivity of PES nanofibres was markedly enhanced after coating them with BG, and introduction of this construct as new bone-graft substitute for bone loss and defects is indicated.
OBJECTIVES: There is growing need for new scaffold constructions for synthetic bone graft substitutes to repair large bone lesions. A very promising and important class of new implants for tissue engineering is based on three-dimensional scaffolds and bioceramics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, after investigation of mechanical properties of polyethersulphone (PES) nanofibres, fabricated by electrospinning methodology and coated with bioactive glass (BG), cells of the MG-63 line were cultured on surfaces of these scaffolds. Their capacity to support MG-63 proliferation was also investigated in vitro by MTT assay. Osteoconductivity on these scaffolds was investigated by the common osteogenic markers alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, calcium mineral deposition and bone-related gene activation. Next, a bone reconstruction of rat critical-size defects model was evaluated using radiographic imaging analysis (digital mammography), computed tomography and histological examination. RESULTS: In vitro results indicated that biocompatibility and osteogenic markers of MG-63 cells were significantly enhanced after coating PES with BG. Based on in vivo results, new bone formation in the defect site was enhanced in implanted rats in comparison with a control group. The highest reconstruction was observed in animals implanted with BG-coated nanofibres. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoconductivity of PES nanofibres was markedly enhanced after coating them with BG, and introduction of this construct as new bone-graft substitute for bone loss and defects is indicated.
Authors: J Venugopal; Molamma P Prabhakaran; Yanzhong Zhang; Sharon Low; Aw Tar Choon; S Ramakrishna Journal: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Bo Lei; Kwan-Ha Shin; Da-Young Noh; In-Hwan Jo; Young-Hag Koh; Hyoun-Ee Kim; Sung Eun Kim Journal: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 7.328
Authors: Blanca San Miguel; Rytis Kriauciunas; Samuele Tosatti; Martin Ehrbar; Chafik Ghayor; Marcus Textor; Franz E Weber Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Si Chen; Dagmar Galusková; Hana Kaňková; Kai Zheng; Martin Michálek; Liliana Liverani; Dušan Galusek; Aldo R Boccaccini Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 3.623