Literature DB >> 26121263

Accessibility to Reperfusion Therapy Among Women with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Impact on Hospital Mortality.

Eva de-Miguel-Balsa1, Jaime Latour-Pérez1, Anna Baeza-Román1, Ana Llamas-Álvarez1, Javier Ruiz-Ruiz2, Ma Paz Fuset-Cabanes3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The available evidence about the effect of gender and/or sex on mortality differences is contradictory. Our aim is to assess the impact of gender on the access to reperfusion therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), and secondly, to analyze the effect of delay on the differences with regard to hospital mortality.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among consecutive patients with STEMI included in the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry (2010-2013).
RESULTS: A total of 4816 patients were included (22.09% women). Women were older, presented with longer patient delay (90 vs. 75 minutes, p=0.0066), higher risk profile (GRACE>140: 75.1% vs. 56.05%, p<0.0001), and received less reperfusion therapy (68.8% vs. 74.7%, p<0.0001) with longer total reperfusion time (307 vs. 240 minutes, p<0.0001). Women received less thrombolysis (24.53% vs. 29.98%, p<0.0001) and longer door-to-needle time (85 vs. 70 minutes, p 0.0023). We found no differences regarding primary percutaneous coronary intervention or door-to-balloon time. Women also had higher hospital mortality (crude odds ratio 2.54, 95% confidence interval 1.99-3.26, p<0.0001), which persisted after controlling the effect of patient delay, age, risk (GRACE), and reperfusion (adjusted odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.06, p=0.0492). Using TIMI or Killip risk scores as risk estimates yielded nonsignificant results.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with men, women with STEMI have worse access to reperfusion and higher hospital mortality. The impact of the differences in accessibility on mortality gap remains uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26121263     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  2 in total

1.  Sex, Myocardial Infarction, and the Failure of Risk Scores in Women.

Authors:  Shilpa Agrawal; Jennifer Van Eyk; Kimia Sobhani; Janet Wei; C Noel Bairey Merz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 2.  Acute coronary syndromes in women and men.

Authors:  Neha J Pagidipati; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 32.419

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.