| Literature DB >> 26120387 |
Saied Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabab1, Maryam Mohammadi2, Mohammad Ali Morowati Sharif Abad3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transtheoretical model is identified as a comprehensive model for behavior exercise. The aim of this study was to check the situation of stage of change in exercise behavior of office personnel of Yazd city using transtheoretical model.Entities:
Keywords: Exercise; Office staff, Yazd; Transtheoretical Model
Year: 2013 PMID: 26120387 PMCID: PMC4477773 DOI: 10.14661/2013.588-593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Electron Physician ISSN: 2008-5842
Coefficient relation matrices of parts of the Transtheoretical Model
| Stages of change | Self efficacy | Cognitive Process of change | Behavioral Process of change | pros | cons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stages of change | 1 | |||||
| Self efficacy | 0.403 | 1 | ||||
| Cognitive Process of change | 0.444 | 0.449 | 1 | |||
| Behavioral Process of change | 0.558 | 0.461 | 0.641 | 1 | ||
| Pros | 0.326 | 0.477 | 0.477 | 0.484 | 1 | |
| Cons | −0.331 | −0.261 | −0.231 | −0.270 | −0.365 | 1 |
Comparison of mean and standard deviation self efficacy and decisional balance (pro and cons) and processes of change (behavioral and cognitive process) according to stage of change
| Self efficacy | Behavioral process of change | Cognitive process of change | Pros | cons | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Pre contemplation | 2.86 | 0.61 | 2.56 | 0.47 | 2.86 | 0.37 | 3.16 | 0.33 | 2.28 | 0.27 |
| Contemplation | 2.87 | 0.39 | 2.75 | 0.40 | 3.00 | 0.32 | 3.20 | 0.31 | 2.26 | 0.25 |
| Preparation | 3.16 | 0.47 | 3.03 | 0.40 | 3.17 | 0.34 | 3.27 | 0.32 | 3.13 | 0.22 |
| Action | 3.13 | 0.55 | 3.11 | 0.40 | 3.17 | 0.34 | 3.31 | 0.36 | 2.17 | 0.24 |
| Maintenance | 3.29 | 0.43 | 3.35 | 0.35 | 3.37 | 0.33 | 3.48 | 0.30 | 2 | 0.37 |
| ANOVA | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||||||
| POST HOC | PC<P,A,M | PC<P,A,M | PC<P,A,M | CP<A,M | M<PC,CP | |||||
Comparison of mean and standard deviation self efficacy and decisional balance and processes of change according to age
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self efficacy | 2.89 | 0.50 | 3.00 | 0.47 | 2.97 | 0.57 | 2.97 | 0.51 | 0.080 |
| decisional balance | 1.06 | 0.47 | 0.91 | 0.46 | 1.27 | 0.53 | 1.06 | 0.50 | 0.000 |
| Pros | 3.26 | 0.33 | 3.18 | 0.32 | 3.38 | 0.30 | 3.26 | 0.32 | 0.004 |
| Cons | 2.18 | 0.29 | 2.24 | 0.29 | 2.12 | 0.30 | 2.19 | 0.29 | 0.066 |
| Process of change | 2.95 | 0.35 | 2.96 | 0.37 | 3.10 | 0.42 | 2.99 | 0.38 | 0.054 |
| Cognitive Process of change | 3.03 | 0.34 | 3.04 | 0.38 | 3.21 | 0.37 | 3.08 | 0.37 | 0.010 |
| Behavioral Process of change | 2.83 | 0.47 | 2.89 | 0.45 | 3.00 | 0.54 | 2.89 | 0.49 | .126 |