Literature DB >> 26119759

Optimal treatment allocation for placebo-treatment comparisons in trials with discrete-time survival endpoints.

Mirjam Moerbeek1, Weng-Kee Wong2.   

Abstract

In many randomized controlled trials, treatment groups are of equal size, but this is not necessarily the best choice. This paper provides a methodology to calculate optimal treatment allocations for longitudinal trials when we wish to compare multiple treatment groups with a placebo group, and the comparisons may have unequal importance. The focus is on trials with a survival endpoint measured in discrete time. We assume the underlying survival process is Weibull and show that values for the parameters in the Weibull distribution have an impact on the optimal treatment allocation scheme in an interesting way. Additionally, we incorporate different cost considerations at the subject and measurement levels and determine the optimal number of time periods. We also show that when many events occur at the beginning of the trial, fewer time periods are more efficient. As an application, we revisit a risperidone maintenance treatment trial in schizophrenia and use our proposed methodology to redesign it and compare merits of our optimal design.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cox regression model; design efficiency; longitudinal study; multiple-objective optimal design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26119759      PMCID: PMC4793279          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

1.  Optimal treatment allocation in comparative biomedical studies.

Authors:  W Zhu; W K Wong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  The use of unequal randomisation ratios in clinical trials: a review.

Authors:  J C Dumville; S Hahn; J N V Miles; D J Torgerson
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Sample size formulae for trials comparing group and individual treatments in a multilevel model.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek; Weng Kee Wong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Sample size formula with a continuous outcome for unequal group sizes and unequal variances.

Authors:  H J Schouten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Efficiency of balanced treatment allocation for survival analysis.

Authors:  L A Kalish; D P Harrington
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risperidone maintenance treatment in schizophrenia: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Chuan-Yue Wang; Yu-Tao Xiang; Zhuo-Ji Cai; Yong-Zhen Weng; Qi-Jing Bo; Jing-Ping Zhao; Tie-Qiao Liu; Gao-Hua Wang; Shi-Min Weng; Hong-Yan Zhang; Da-Fang Chen; Wai-Kwong Tang; Gabor S Ungvari
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 18.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.