Mary E Klingensmith1, Michael Awad2, Keith A Delman3, Karen Deveney4, Thomas J Fahey5, Jason S Lees6, Pamela Lipsett7, John T Mullen8, Douglas S Smink9, Jeffrey Wayne10. 1. Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: klingensmithm@wustl.edu. 2. Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri. 3. Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. 5. Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 7. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 8. Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 10. Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of residents and program directors (PDs) involved in flexible training to gauge satisfaction with this training paradigm and elicit limitations. DESIGN: Anonymous surveys were sent to residents and PDs in participant programs. Respondents were asked to rate responses on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). SETTING: A total of 9 residency programs that are collaborating to prospectively study the effect of flexible tracks on resident performance and outcome. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 138 residents who were in clinical years 4 and 5 and 10 PDs. RESULTS: Of the 138 possible residents, 100 responded to the resident survey (72.5% response rate). Among resident respondents, 33% were participating in a flexible track option. The most frequently listed specialties of focus were cardiothoracic surgery (19%), vascular surgery (13%), acute care surgery (11%), colorectal surgery (8%), surgical oncology (7%), and pediatric surgery (7%). Participants in flexible tracks tended to strongly agree that their career would be enhanced by flexible rotations; interestingly, of those not in flexible tracks, most tended to also agree that flexible rotations would enhance their future careers. Flexible track participants report receiving greater autonomy on flexible rotations and believe they would be better prepared for fellowship and career. They express overall very high satisfaction with the flexible experience. Limitations expressed by residents (in flexible tracks or not) include uncertainty for how this paradigm serves those interested in comprehensive general surgery, concern about scheduling difficulties, and some displeasure in missing high-volume general surgery rotations in lieu of specialty-focused rotations. The PD survey was completed by 8 of 9 PDs for a response rate of 89%. All the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that careers of residents are enhanced by flexible rotations and that important operative and clinical experiences are gained. Overall, 87.5% of PD respondents agreed or strongly agreed that those in flexible tracks have greater opportunities for mentorship in their chosen field. PDs also expressed high levels of satisfaction with flexible rotations. Limitations include concerns that the flexibility option presents scheduling difficulties and does not go far enough in reforming postgraduate education. CONCLUSIONS: This survey of 9 residency programs participating in flexible tracks indicates satisfaction with this training option. The role of comprehensive general surgery as a training end point and scheduling difficulties remain as major challenges. Outcomes of graduates in these tracks and control peers are being prospectively evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the attitudes of residents and program directors (PDs) involved in flexible training to gauge satisfaction with this training paradigm and elicit limitations. DESIGN: Anonymous surveys were sent to residents and PDs in participant programs. Respondents were asked to rate responses on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). SETTING: A total of 9 residency programs that are collaborating to prospectively study the effect of flexible tracks on resident performance and outcome. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 138 residents who were in clinical years 4 and 5 and 10 PDs. RESULTS: Of the 138 possible residents, 100 responded to the resident survey (72.5% response rate). Among resident respondents, 33% were participating in a flexible track option. The most frequently listed specialties of focus were cardiothoracic surgery (19%), vascular surgery (13%), acute care surgery (11%), colorectal surgery (8%), surgical oncology (7%), and pediatric surgery (7%). Participants in flexible tracks tended to strongly agree that their career would be enhanced by flexible rotations; interestingly, of those not in flexible tracks, most tended to also agree that flexible rotations would enhance their future careers. Flexible track participants report receiving greater autonomy on flexible rotations and believe they would be better prepared for fellowship and career. They express overall very high satisfaction with the flexible experience. Limitations expressed by residents (in flexible tracks or not) include uncertainty for how this paradigm serves those interested in comprehensive general surgery, concern about scheduling difficulties, and some displeasure in missing high-volume general surgery rotations in lieu of specialty-focused rotations. The PD survey was completed by 8 of 9 PDs for a response rate of 89%. All the respondents agreed or strongly agreed that careers of residents are enhanced by flexible rotations and that important operative and clinical experiences are gained. Overall, 87.5% of PD respondents agreed or strongly agreed that those in flexible tracks have greater opportunities for mentorship in their chosen field. PDs also expressed high levels of satisfaction with flexible rotations. Limitations include concerns that the flexibility option presents scheduling difficulties and does not go far enough in reforming postgraduate education. CONCLUSIONS: This survey of 9 residency programs participating in flexible tracks indicates satisfaction with this training option. The role of comprehensive general surgery as a training end point and scheduling difficulties remain as major challenges. Outcomes of graduates in these tracks and control peers are being prospectively evaluated.
Keywords:
Patient Care, Medical Knowledge; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; autonomy; general surgery; graduate medical education; postgraduate education; subspecialty surgery training; surgery residency training
Authors: Darren R Cullinan; Paul E Wise; Keith A Delman; John R Potts; Michael M Awad; Timothy J Eberlein; Mary E Klingensmith Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 6.113