Literature DB >> 26118849

Interventions preventing ankle sprains; previous injury and high-risk sport participation as predictors of compliance.

Kasper W Janssen1, Babette C van der Zwaard2, Caroline F Finch3, Willem van Mechelen4, Evert A L M Verhagen4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the association between participants' person-related potential predictor variables and cumulative compliance with interventions for preventing ankle sprains: neuromuscular training, wearing an ankle brace, and a combined training and bracing.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of compliance data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing measures preventing ankle ligament injuries.
METHODS: Ordinal regression with a backward selection method was used to obtain a descriptive statistical model linking participants' person-related potential predictor variables with the monthly cumulative compliance measurements for three interventions preventing ankle ligament injuries.
RESULTS: Having had a previous ankle injury was significantly associated with a higher compliance with all of the preventive measures trialed. Overall compliance with bracing and the combined intervention was significantly lower than the compliance with NM training. Per group analysis found that participating in a high-risk sport, like soccer, basketball, and volleyball, was significantly associated with a higher compliance with bracing, or a combined bracing and NM training. In contrast, participating in a high-risk sport was significantly associated with a lower per group compliance with NM training.
CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should include at least registration of previous ankle sprains, sport participation (high- or low-risk), experience in NM training, and hours of sport exposure as possible predictors of compliance with interventions preventing ankle sprains. Practitioners should take into account these variables when prescribing preventive neuromuscular training or bracing.
Copyright © 2015 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle injuries; Braces; Ligament sprain; Neuromuscular training; Sports

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26118849     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Perceptual Framework for Conservative Treatment and Rehabilitation of Ankle Sprains: An Evidence-Based Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Patrick O McKeon; Luke Donovan
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  User Survey of 3 Ankle Braces in Soccer, Volleyball, and Running: Which Brace Fits Best?

Authors:  Kasper Janssen; Anjulie Van Den Berg; Willem Van Mechelen; Evert Verhagen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Postural stability deficit could predict ankle sprains: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Konstantinos Alexiou; Annunziato Amendola; Claude T Moorman; Kristian Samuelsson; Olufemi R Ayeni; Stefano Zaffagnini; Timothy Sell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Determining a preventive strategy for ankle sprain injury through a questionnaire survey of coaches of junior high school basketball teams.

Authors:  Kosuke Ono; Kiyokazu Akasaka; Takahiro Otsudo; Yuki Hasebe; Hiroshi Hattori; Yasuaki Mizoguchi; Mitsuru Yamamoto; Mikio Fujimoto
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2022-01-12

5.  Effectiveness of Health-Related Behavior Interventions on Physical Activity-Related Injuries in Junior Middle School Students.

Authors:  Dongchun Tang; Weicong Cai; Wenda Yang; Shangmin Chen; Liping Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.