| Literature DB >> 26118410 |
Kenjiro Fukushima1, Reina Fujiwara, Kie Yamamoto, Hideyuki Kanemoto, Koichi Ohno, Masaya Tsuboi, Kazuyuki Uchida, Naoaki Matsuki, Ryohei Nishimura, Hajime Tsujimoto.
Abstract
Little information is available regarding triple-phase computed tomography (CT) of canine pancreatic insulinoma. A few case reports with small numbers of cases have indicated that hyper-attenuation in the arterial phase was a common finding on multi-phasic CT in dogs with insulinoma. Our purpose was to clarify the characteristic findings of dogs with insulinoma on triple-phase CT. Nine dogs with insulinoma that underwent triple-phase CT were included in the present study. Attenuation patterns in the arterial phase indicated hypo-attenuation in 4 cases and hyper-attenuation in 2 cases. In the remaining 3 cases, 1 case showed hypo-attenuation and 1 case showed hyper-attenuation in the pancreatic phase, and 1 case presented hyper-attenuation in the later phase. Altogether, 5 cases showed hypo and 4 cases showed hyper-attenuation in at least one phase. The enhancement pattern was homogenous in 7 cases and heterogeneous in 2 cases. Tumor margins were well-defined in 5 cases and ill-defined in 4 cases. Capsule formation was present in 5 cases and absent in 4 cases. In conclusion, it is important to note that hypo-attenuation was as common as hyper-attenuation in dogs with insulinoma in triple-phase CT in at least one phase. Additionally, mass lesions were most conspicuous not only in the arterial phase but in the pancreatic and later phases in some cases. Therefore, it is important to perform triple-phase CT and notice about variable findings for the detection of canine pancreatic insulinoma.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26118410 PMCID: PMC4710709 DOI: 10.1292/jvms.15-0077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Med Sci ISSN: 0916-7250 Impact factor: 1.267
Clinical features of the cases
| Case No. | Breed | Sex | Age | BW (kg) | GLU (mg/d | Insulin
( | AIGR | US findings | CT findings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Size (mm) | |||||||||
| 1 | Pug | SF | 8y10m | 7.7 | 35 | 15.8 | 316 | ND | Left | 20 |
| 2 | WCP | CM | 8y3m | 15.6 | 44 | 22.9 | 163.6 | ND | Body | 8.5 |
| 3 | Mix | SF | 7y6m | 11.0 | 37 | 13.8 | 200 | ND | Right | 12 |
| 4 | Maltase | SF | 9y3m | 3.3 | 32 | 1.8 | 90 | ND | Left | 9 |
| 5 | Shi Tzu | SF | 11y | 6.6 | 34 | 73.9 | 1,848 | + (left) | Left | 18 |
| 6 | FCR | CM | 7y11m | 27.7 | 45 | 55.3 | 368.7 | ND | Left | 12 |
| 7 | Mix | M | 9y8m | 18.6 | 50 | 27.6 | 137.8 | ND | Right | 12 |
| 8 | LR | CM | 8y9m | 33.0 | 38 | 312.0 | 3,900 | ND | Left | 11 |
| 9 | Toy Poodle | M | 11y | 5.8 | 50 | 24.2 | 120.9 | + (right) | Right | 12 |
WCP; Welsh Corgi Pembroke; ACS; American Cocker Spaniel; FCR; Flat-Coated Retriever; LR; Labrador Retriever, M: male; F: female; CM: castrated male; SF: spayed female, AIGR: amended insulin glucose ratio, ND: not detected, Right: right lobe; Left: left lobe; body: pancreatic body.
CT findings in dogs with insulinoma
| Case No. | Overall attenuation | Enhancement pattern | Margin Description | Capsule | LN enlargement (CE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-contrast | Arterial | Pancreatic | Later | |||||
| 1 | Iso | Hypoa) | Hypo | Hypo | Homo | Well | + | − |
| 2 | Iso | Hypoa) | Iso | Iso | Homo | Ill | + | + (−) |
| 3 | Iso | Hypera) | Iso | Iso | Homo | Well | − | + (arterial) |
| 4 | Iso | Iso | Hypera) | Iso | Homo | Well | − | − |
| 5 | Iso | Hypera) | Iso | Iso | Hetero | Ill | − | − |
| 6 | Iso | Iso | Iso | Hypera) | Homo | Well | − | + (later) |
| 7 | Iso | Iso | Hypoa) | Hypo | Homo | Ill | + | + (−) |
| 8 | Iso | Hypoa) | Iso | Iso | Hetero | Ill | + | − |
| 9 | Iso | Hypoa) | Hypo | Iso | Homo | Well | + | − |
LN: lymph node, CE: contrast enhancement, Hypo: hypo-attenuation; Iso: iso-attenuation; Hyper: hyper-attenuation, Hetero: heterogeneous; Homo: homogenous, +: present, –: absent, a) The CT value showed the greatest difference between the lesion and pancreatic parenchyma.
Fig. 1.Transverse CT images of a patient with insulinoma (case 9). (A) Pre-contrast: the right lobe of the pancreas (arrowhead) was observed at the dorsal area of the duodenum (arrow). A mass lesion is not evident. (B) Arterial phase: a hypo-attenuating mass lesion with marginal ring enhancement is distinctly observed (arrowhead). The description of the margin was well-defined with a capsule. (C) Pancreatic phase: the hypo-attenuating mass lesion was still found in this phase, but gradually became equivocal. (D) Later phase: the mass lesion became more equivocal than in the early phases.
Fig. 2.Transverse CT images of a patient with insulinoma (case 3). (A) Pre-contrast: the right lobe of the pancreas (arrowhead) was observed at the dorsal area of the duodenum (arrow). A mass lesion is not evident. (B) Arterial phase: a hyper-attenuating mass lesion is distinctly observed (arrowhead). The description of the margin was well-defined without a capsule. (C, D) Pancreatic and Later phases: the mass lesion became equivocal. It is difficult to distinguish the mass lesion from the pancreatic parenchyma.
Fig. 3.Transverse CT images of a patient with insulinoma (case 4). (A) Pre-contrast: the left lobe of the pancreas (*) was observed at the dorsal area of the stomach (stm). A raised lesion was seen, but is not evident (arrowhead). (B) Arterial phase: the mass lesion is not enhanced in this phase (arrowhead). (C) Pancreatic phase: the mass lesion is more distinctly enhanced than the pancreatic parenchyma (arrowhead). (D) Later phase: the lesion is still evident, but more equivocal than in the pancreatic phase.