Literature DB >> 26118330

Obstetrical outcomes and biomarkers to assess exposure to phthalates: A review.

Cécile Marie1, Françoise Vendittelli2, Marie-Pierre Sauvant-Rochat3.   

Abstract

Studies of the effects on pregnancy outcomes of in utero exposure to phthalates, contaminants that are widely present in the environment, have yielded conflicting results. In addition, the mode of assessment of exposure varies between studies. The aim of this review was therefore to establish a current state of knowledge of the phthalates and metabolites involved in unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. Extant data were analyzed to determine which biomarker is the best suited to assess the relation between in utero exposure to phthalates and pregnancy outcomes. This review of the literature was conducted using the database of PubMed. A search was made of studies investigating exposure to phthalates and the following birth outcomes: preterm birth (gestational age <37 weeks), change in gestational age, change in body size at birth (birth weight, length, head circumference), anti-androgenic function, decreased anogenital distance, cryptorchidism, hypospadias and congenital malformation. The methodological approach adopted in each study was examined, in particular the methods used for exposure assessment (biomarkers and/or questionnaire). Thirty-five studies were included. Premature birth and decreased anogenital distance were the most commonly reported outcomes resulting from a moderate level of exposure to phthalates. The principal metabolites detected and involved were primary metabolites of di-2(ethylhexyl)-phthalate (DEHP) and di-n-butyl-phthalate (DnBP). No clear conclusion could be drawn with regard to gestational age at birth, body size at birth and congenital malformations. In epidemiological studies, maternal urine is the most suitable matrix to assess the association between in utero exposure to phthalates and pregnancy outcomes: in contrast to other matrices (cord blood, amniotic fluid, meconium and milk), sampling is easy, non-invasive and, can be repeated to assess exposure throughout pregnancy. Oxidative metabolites are the most relevant biomarkers since they are not prone to external contamination. Further epidemiological studies are required during pregnancy to i) determine the role of phthalates other than DEHP [currently replaced by various substitution products, in particular diisononyl-phthalate (DiNP)]; ii) establish the effect of phthalates on other outcomes (body size adjusted for gestational age, and congenital malformations); iii) determine the pathophysiological pathways; and iv) identify the most suitable time for biomarker determination of in utero exposure to phthalates.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Endocrine disrupters; In utero exposure; Phthalates; Pregnancy outcomes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26118330     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  30 in total

1.  Maternal phthalate exposure during early pregnancy and at delivery in relation to gestational age and size at birth: A preliminary analysis.

Authors:  Deborah J Watkins; Samantha Milewski; Steven E Domino; John D Meeker; Vasantha Padmanabhan
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 2.  Cumulative effects of antiandrogenic chemical mixtures and their relevance to human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Kembra L Howdeshell; Andrew K Hotchkiss; L Earl Gray
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 5.840

3.  Paternal and maternal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and birth weight of singletons conceived by subfertile couples.

Authors:  Carmen Messerlian; Joseph M Braun; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Paige L Williams; Jennifer B Ford; Vicente Mustieles; Antonia M Calafat; Irene Souter; Thomas Toth; Russ Hauser
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Prenatal phthalate biomarker concentrations and performance on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II in a population of young urban children.

Authors:  Brett T Doherty; Stephanie M Engel; Jessie P Buckley; Manori J Silva; Antonia M Calafat; Mary S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Phthalate metabolite levels and menopausal hot flashes in midlife women.

Authors:  Ayelet Ziv-Gal; Lisa Gallicchio; Catheryne Chiang; Sara N Ther; Susan R Miller; Howard A Zacur; Russell L Dills; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Prenatal and ancestral exposure to di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate alters gene expression and DNA methylation in mouse ovaries.

Authors:  Saniya Rattan; Hannah K Beers; Athilakshmi Kannan; Anujaianthi Ramakrishnan; Emily Brehm; Indrani Bagchi; Joseph M K Irudayaraj; Jodi A Flaws
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations in relation to levels of circulating matrix metalloproteinases in pregnant women.

Authors:  Leah D Bedrosian; Kelly K Ferguson; David E Cantonwine; Thomas F McElrath; John D Meeker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Serum beta-carotene modifies the association between phthalate mixtures and insulin resistance: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006.

Authors:  Ming-Chieh Li; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Andrea Bellavia; Paige L Williams; Tamarra James-Todd; Russ Hauser; Jorge E Chavarro; Yu-Han Chiu
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 9.  A systematic review on the adverse health effects of di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate.

Authors:  Maryam Zarean; Mojtaba Keikha; Parinaz Poursafa; Pooyan Khalighinejad; Mohammadmehdi Amin; Roya Kelishadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  First trimester mechanisms of gestational sac placental and foetal teratogenicity: a framework for birth cohort studies.

Authors:  Jennifer J Adibi; Alexander J Layden; Rahel L Birru; Alexandra Miragaia; Xiaoshuang Xun; Megan C Smith; Qing Yin; Marisa E Millenson; Thomas G O'Connor; Emily S Barrett; Nathaniel W Snyder; Shyamal Peddada; Rod T Mitchell
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 15.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.