Pimprapa Kitwitee1, Supon Limwattananon1, Chulaporn Limwattananon1, Ornanong Waleekachonlert2, Tananan Ratanachotpanich2, Mattabhorn Phimphilai3, Tuan V Nguyen4, Chatlert Pongchaiyakul5. 1. Social and Administrative Pharmacy Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. 2. Clinical Pharmacy Research Unit, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham Univeristy, Thailand. 3. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. 4. Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia. 5. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Electronic address: pchatl@kku.ac.th.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of metformin and insulin in the treatment of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted by including randomized controlled trials comparing metformin and insulin in GDM. An electronic search was conducted to identify relevant studies. Data were synthesized by a random effects meta-analysis model. A Bayesian analysis was also performed to account for uncertainties in the treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials involving 1712 individuals were included in the final analysis. The pooled estimates of metformin-insulin differences were very small and statistically non-significant in fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose and HbA1c, measured at 36-37 weeks of gestation. Notably, 14-46% of those receiving metformin required additional insulin. Compared with the insulin group, metformin treatment was associated with a lower incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (relative risk, RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.93; P=0.01) and of neonatal intensive care admission (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.97; P=0.03). Bayesian analysis revealed that the efficacy of metformin was consistently higher than insulin with a probability of over 98% on these two neonatal complications. Other outcomes were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In women with gestational diabetes, metformin use and insulin therapy have comparable glycemic control profile, but metformin use was associated with lower risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of metformin and insulin in the treatment of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: A meta-analysis was conducted by including randomized controlled trials comparing metformin and insulin in GDM. An electronic search was conducted to identify relevant studies. Data were synthesized by a random effects meta-analysis model. A Bayesian analysis was also performed to account for uncertainties in the treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Eight clinical trials involving 1712 individuals were included in the final analysis. The pooled estimates of metformin-insulin differences were very small and statistically non-significant in fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose and HbA1c, measured at 36-37 weeks of gestation. Notably, 14-46% of those receiving metformin required additional insulin. Compared with the insulin group, metformin treatment was associated with a lower incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (relative risk, RR 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.93; P=0.01) and of neonatal intensive care admission (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.97; P=0.03). Bayesian analysis revealed that the efficacy of metformin was consistently higher than insulin with a probability of over 98% on these two neonatal complications. Other outcomes were not significantly different between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In women with gestational diabetes, metformin use and insulin therapy have comparable glycemic control profile, but metformin use was associated with lower risk of neonatal hypoglycemia.
Authors: Diane Farrar; Mark Simmonds; Maria Bryant; Trevor A Sheldon; Derek Tuffnell; Su Golder; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Rachel T McGrath; Sarah J Glastras; Emma S Scott; Samantha L Hocking; Gregory R Fulcher Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Janet A Rowan; Elaine C Rush; Lindsay D Plank; Jun Lu; Victor Obolonkin; Suzette Coat; William M Hague Journal: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Date: 2018-04-13