Ken Ip, Lorraine Hartley, Kamal Solanki, Douglas White1. 1. Rheumatology Department, Waikato Hospital, Pembroke Street, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. Douglas.White@waikatodhb.health.nz.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the retention on anti-TNF agents used in a real-world setting, and determine the factors predicting retention on drug. METHOD: Patients starting anti-TNF therapy were recorded prospectively on the departmental database. Medical records of all patients commenced on anti-TNF therapy between 2006 and 2013 at the Rheumatology Department, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, were retrospectively reviewed to obtain details of their course on biologic therapy. RESULTS: 183 patients were identified. 139 (76.5%) were commenced on adalimumab. The predominant indication was rheumatoid arthritis (52.5%). 60 patients (32.8%) discontinued their initial anti-TNF agent. Of these, 31.7% were due to primary failure, 36.7% due to secondary failure and 25% due to adverse events. At 5 years, retention on agents was: adalimumab (77.2%), etanercept (69.6%) and infliximab (16.7%). Retention on adalimumab was significantly higher than infliximab (p<0.001), but did not differ between adalimumab and etanercept, or etanercept and infliximab. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, retention on infliximab was significantly lower than adalimumab.
AIM: To investigate the retention on anti-TNF agents used in a real-world setting, and determine the factors predicting retention on drug. METHOD:Patients starting anti-TNF therapy were recorded prospectively on the departmental database. Medical records of all patients commenced on anti-TNF therapy between 2006 and 2013 at the Rheumatology Department, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, were retrospectively reviewed to obtain details of their course on biologic therapy. RESULTS: 183 patients were identified. 139 (76.5%) were commenced on adalimumab. The predominant indication was rheumatoid arthritis (52.5%). 60 patients (32.8%) discontinued their initial anti-TNF agent. Of these, 31.7% were due to primary failure, 36.7% due to secondary failure and 25% due to adverse events. At 5 years, retention on agents was: adalimumab (77.2%), etanercept (69.6%) and infliximab (16.7%). Retention on adalimumab was significantly higher than infliximab (p<0.001), but did not differ between adalimumab and etanercept, or etanercept and infliximab. CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, retention on infliximab was significantly lower than adalimumab.
Authors: Luisa Costa; Carlo Perricone; Maria Sole Chimenti; Antonio Del Puente; Paolo Caso; Rosario Peluso; Paolo Bottiglieri; Raffaele Scarpa; Francesco Caso Journal: Drugs R D Date: 2017-12